Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New Docs Show Gov't Forewarned on Katrina

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 07:32 PM
Original message
New Docs Show Gov't Forewarned on Katrina
http://www.newsday.com/news/politics/wire/sns-ap-katrina-levees,0,3658995.story?coll=sns-ap-politics-headlines

The Homeland Security Department was warned a day before Hurricane Katrina hit that the storm's surge could breach levees and leave New Orleans flooded for weeks or months, documents released Monday show.

An Aug. 28 report by the department's National Infrastructure Simulation and Analysis Center concluded that a Category 4 or 5 hurricane would cause severe damage in the city, including power outages and a direct economic hit of up to $10 billion for the first week.

"Overall, the impacts described herein are conservative," stated the report, which was sent to Homeland Security's office for infrastructure protection.

"Any storm rated Category 4 or greater ... will likely lead to severe flooding and/or levee breaching, leaving the New Orleans metro area submerged for weeks or months," said the report, which was released by a Senate panel examining the government's breakdown in responding to Katrina.

The documents are the latest indication that the federal government knew beforehand of the catastrophic damage that a storm of Katrina's magnitude could cause.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
madaboutharry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hell, everyone knows that these warnings
about Hurricane Katrina were "HISTORICAL."

This administration is not only criminal and corrupt, it is simply downright incompetent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. A heckuva failure by Bush & Cronies. As usual.
they screw up -- or corrupt -- everything they touch
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalEsto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. Homeland Security was too busy spying
on little old Quaker ladies
to pay any attention to the hurricane warning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Surya Gayatri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #3
23. And skimming off the budget
for the good ol' Bush gang--handing out no-bid contracts to the cronies. SG
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tocqueville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
4. just saw a debate about global climate on French TV...
Edited on Mon Jan-23-06 07:50 PM by tocqueville
discussing the cold wave in Europe and its geopolitics. One top meteorologist warned that ocean temperatures are already "predicting" that the next hurricane season will as bad (or even worse) than the last one... I hope he is wrong...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
5. Interesting now that there is debate that it may have been a 3 when it hit
Oh, that means it really wasn't that bad? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pitohui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #5
28. it was a 3 when it hit new orleans, it was a 4 when it made landfall
Edited on Tue Jan-24-06 01:34 PM by pitohui
it was a 4 at buras, louisiana, that place was scrubbed off the map, it's unbelievable

it was a 3 when it hit new orleans, not really any serious debate abt it, we are well inland

the floodwalls were only built to withstand a fast-moving 3, not a slow-moving 3, or at least that is the excuse of the week, sigh

regular levees -- the river levees which held and protected french quarter and uptown from flooding -- might even withstand a 4 or 5

the floodwalls must not be rebuilt, we need to rebuild w. the traditional regular levees everywhere of that type proven to protect, yes, that means some homes and streets will have to be taken since better levees require a bigger footprint, and i find i don't want to hear any more shit abt it, i had no business living on a street by the london ave. floodwall and I know a couple who are dead now because they lived there, it is simply unsafe and people should not be permitted to return to places that can't be made safe for human habitation, it's unfair to them and it's unfair to their families and those they leave behind

compensate people well who can't return to the same spot but don't allow them to play in traffic again, this atlantic hurricane cycle could last another 50 years supposedly and it will certainly last another 10 years, 2006 is predicted to be about the same as 2005, we are not gonna get thru this thing doing the same shit that didn't work the first time!

but in answer to yr question, there is no doubt that katrina was a 3 at new orleans, the debate is only whether it was a 3 or a 4 on the coast, it seems obvious to me that it was a 4 but it takes a long time when instruments are destroyed to get a full scientific proof

did you know that andrew was not accepted as cat 5 until 10 full years after landfall?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #28
38. sorry, I meant 3 at New Orleans, yes it hit the coast much harder
:blush: sorry. I am just ironically amused that now they are saying that it wasn't that bad when it hit NO, but hey guys, the damage and aftermath are the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
intheflow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #5
37. I don't know if I buy that.
I'm working hurricane relief in Mississippi. I grew up in Massachusetts and we had a few 3's hit, but they were nothing like the devastation down here.

Personally, I think the down-grading was somehow influenced by the insurance companies. I'm not sure what their motivation would be, unless it was to get higher premiums for lower cat storms when the coast is rebuilt.

That's my :tinfoilhat: d'jour.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. Where are you?
Sorry, I meant only about NO, that now "they" are saying that it was only a 3 so it wasn't really that bad, but I know it was a lot more and a whole hell of a lot of destruction was done. What, with whom and where are you working?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
intheflow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. I'm in Biloxi.
Working with two groups, Hands On USA and the Mississippi Coast Interfaith Disaster Task Force. Plenty of work to go around!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #41
49. Good job and there is plenty.
You mean you haven't cleaned it all up yet? But Mardi Gras is happening this yr so everything must be fine. Thanks for helping. There is a huge amount of work and we must all work together since we are on our own (no gvt cavalry coming to help)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
6. Kick!
:kick: :kick: :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
7. A day before??? The computer models showed them 2 years before
exactly what would happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pitohui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #7
29. yes, but that's not really to the point
we can't afford to have national guard troops and fema emergency supplies, medics, etc. located in every city 2 years ahead of a possible event

when manhattan is hit by a cat 2, it will make katrina look like a walk in the park, and one day it will happen, but we can't do much abt it now, because it might not happen for 50 years or 100 years

once you get a hurricane that is actually on track for a major city, this is when you need to be moving supplies, troops, etc. to that city

i don't blame anybody for not having nat'l guard here 2 years in advance

what i blame them for is not having nat'l guard here 2 days in advance which should be standard practice and was standard practice during the clinton era
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-23-06 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
8. No documents needed.. It was on TV 24-7 for DAYS
brownie talked on TV BEFORE katrina
Bush talked on tv BEFORE katrina
Skeletor talked on TV BEFORE katrina

EVERYONE KNEW WHAT WOULD HAPPEN.. It was NOT a surprise..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LizW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 08:16 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. It was, wasn't it?
We are truly living in bizarro world.

EVERYONE who was conscious knew that there was a danger of the levees being breached or breaking entirely. And everyone knew that if that happened, NO would be sitting is a bowl of water up to the rooftops.

It was discussed on cable news! The disastrous effects of a direct hurricane hit on NO were known for YEARS, and not just by "experts", but by average people, at least down in the southeast in hurricane country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DocSavage Donating Member (594 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #8
33. With in
the first week of living in New Orleans, we were told by numerous people that in the event of a hurricaine, get out! The leveys will breach and the city will flood. During one very wet rain cycle, 3-4 days of steady rain, the pumps were overwhelmed and a lot of the city flooded.

We were told when looking to buy a house, look in the nooks and crannies of the downstairs to see if you could find water marks. The whole area floods during bad rain, we knew what would happen during a hurricaine.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuffleClaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 01:25 AM
Response to Original message
9. they still are covering up something like 3000 missing people
from that tragedy. dead? moved? who knows? it sure isn't 'news'. yet more evidence that only some people count to this administration. and the rape of new orleans is underway in the form of a land grab. but that too isn't 'news'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oc2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #9
20. what is 'news' will not be covered, unless it is 'infotainment'

besides,, why bother people with facts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKNancy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
10. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tin Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 08:11 AM
Response to Original message
11. WP - White House Got Early Warning on Katrina
By Joby Warrick
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, January 24, 2006; Page A02

In the 48 hours before Hurricane Katrina hit, the White House received detailed warnings about the storm's likely impact, including eerily prescient predictions of breached levees, massive flooding, and major losses of life and property, documents show.

A 41-page assessment by the Department of Homeland Security's National Infrastructure Simulation and Analysis Center (NISAC), was delivered by e-mail to the White House's "situation room," the nerve center where crises are handled, at 1:47 a.m. on Aug. 29, the day the storm hit, according to an e-mail cover sheet accompanying the document.

The NISAC paper warned that a storm of Katrina's size would "likely lead to severe flooding and/or levee breaching" and specifically noted the potential for levee failures along Lake Pontchartrain. It predicted economic losses in the tens of billions of dollars, including damage to public utilities and industry that would take years to fully repair. Initial response and rescue operations would be hampered by disruption of telecommunications networks and the loss of power to fire, police and emergency workers, it said.

In a second document, also obtained by The Washington Post, a computer slide presentation by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, prepared for a 9 a.m. meeting on Aug. 27, two days before Katrina made landfall, compared Katrina's likely impact to that of "Hurricane Pam," a fictional Category 3 storm used in a series of FEMA disaster-preparedness exercises simulating the effects of a major hurricane striking New Orleans. But Katrina, the report warned, could be worse.

...

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/23/AR2006012301711.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shawn703 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 08:11 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Move along
Nothing to see here...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #12
31. That's just what he did! He declared NO a disaster area and
then went off to eat cake with McCain and do a little golfing. He moved along alright. He knew very well what would happen...now he claims ignorance. Well he's right on that point!

I think he LIHOP so he could get the blacks out of NO and his rich buddies could buy up all that land for cheap. It was a god send for him and his crowd...just like 9/11. He's one F***** up human (?) BEING!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oc2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #11
19. they also got a early warning before 9/11, that was ignored too...

because they are incompetent bunch of corporate whores in the WH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
14. Hurricane Katrina determined to strike in US...
Edited on Tue Jan-24-06 09:09 AM by tanyev
Got exactly the same reaction as the Bin Laden warning: *yawn*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftHander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
15. They had plenty of time to do what they do best...
Bush vacationed and Rove got those staged photo ops planned.



That is all they did. Bush relied on Brownie and went to his scheduled photo ops thinking everything was going well.

What a jackass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #15
40. Isn't this the "go to the salvation army"
The one where he kept telling the young women to go get help from the Salvation Army, only to need to be told over and over and over that the SA was washed away, that there was no SA, but there would be a SA van delivering stuff sometime? How could he be there, see this, and still not get it? How how how? rhetorical question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
16. kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ima_sinnic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
17. & yesterday * was STILL blathering about how he's there to
"protect" the citizens. Is there ANYone who buys that? Even the most devout freeper must be able to put 2 and 2 together and conclude, after seeing the Katrina debacle, that that "protection" is scant to nonexistent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
18. "Brownie, you're doing a heckuva job."...so was Chertoff.
Fuckers LET people die!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Surya Gayatri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
21. But, but...nobody could have
anticipated that the levees would be breeched! Unless my memory fails me, i seem to recall somebody using that justification? Or was that a daydream?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_eh_N_eh_D_eh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
22. PDB: Mother Nature Determined to Strike in US
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kcass1954 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. Solution: Declare a "Global War on the Weather".
We can't win that one either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
connecticut yankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
25. Rush Limbaugh
Edited on Tue Jan-24-06 12:57 PM by connecticut yankee
is presently on the air, ridiculing the report.

"Katrina was Bush's fault, folks!"

Putz!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mark11727 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #25
36. That dumbass should know the difference...
...between preventing an onrushing hurricane (which of course, nobody can), and being prepared for one (which * should've been)!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
26. Hey, don't "play the blame game".......
if you criticize the bush administration, the terrorists have won!

How can the Democrats even THINK that the bush administration dropped the ball on Katrina? They'd better watch what they say! :sarcasm: (as if the emoticon is needed)

This administration has been nothing but one catastrophe after another. Can we end our national nightmare soon. Please? :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pitohui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
27. "bush knew"
hey with 9-11 he was told on aug. 6 that the attacks were coming, more than a month's warning

he chose to read the goat story and eat the cake

hamlet looks like a figure of decisiveness and decision compared to bush



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demo dutch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
30. Everyone knew for years!! except the Feds
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lies and propaganda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
32. yep. And a Dem gov is going down in flames for it.
Im really afraid that my homestate is about to go redder than ever imagined. The bullshit that my friends and family belive is insane, you would do think that Blanco and Nagin said 'Fuck em" and left em stranded for a week.


pos repugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
34. warnings "began a year before Hurricane Katrina slammed into the Gulf Coas
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/1153AP_Katrina_Levees.html

WASHINGTON -- Senators lambasted the Bush administration on Tuesday for failing to heed devastating predictions from a hurricane preparedness test that began a year before Hurricane Katrina slammed into the Gulf Coast.

The top Democrat on the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee also accused the White House of trying to block or delay the panel's inquiry into the government's sluggish response to Katrina.

The preparedness exercise that began in July 2004, dubbed Hurricane Pam, warned that a Category 3 storm would overwhelm the New Orleans area with flood waters, killing up to 60,000 people and destroying buildings and roads. State and federal officials were concluding Pam's findings when Katrina, an actual Category 4 storm, roared ashore on Aug. 29.

"As a dry run for the real thing, Pam should have been a wake-up call that could not be ignored," said Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, chair of the Senate committee's examination of Pam's findings at a Tuesday hearing. "Instead, it is apparent that a more appropriate name for Pam should have been 'Cassandra' - the mythical prophet who warned of disasters but whom no one believed."

...more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
car Donating Member (5 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
35. Surprise Surprise
It was no surpise that there would be huge damage. It was on the news before it hit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neuvocat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
42. I just saw this on NBC.
Its got legs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #42
48. With this corrupt incompetent administration,
it should be a centipede.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsharp88 Donating Member (178 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
43. Can't be. Bush ignored the warning???
Next thing you'll be telling me is that he ignored warnings about Osama bin Laden looking for federal targets to attack in the USA.

Don in New Orleans
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleedingheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
44. Double fucking duh!
For crying out loud the entire nation was aware that there was a big possibility that Katrina was going to submerge New Orleans under storm surges and flooding...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
45. Another lie exposed.
We knew this fact when it occured.

Will the whore media blast this, let alone mention it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benfranklin1776 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-24-06 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
46. How do you know Junior is lying
Answer: His lips are moving. This is the same administration that says: "trust us" we are only spying on bad people, we are "vigorously" enforcing mine safety laws, we "care" about civil rights, we "reformed" student aid not cut it etc." This is the most mendacious bunch of lying weasels to ever occupy the executive branch in this nation's history. They do the exact reverse of what they say publicly. Indeed that is a good barometer of where the truth lies, in diametric opposition to their hollow snake oil sales pitches.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JWS Donating Member (298 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-25-06 05:26 AM
Response to Original message
47. Guess he was waiting for God to warn him. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC