Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senior House Republican wants answers on wiretap program

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
rawstory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-08-06 06:34 PM
Original message
Senior House Republican wants answers on wiretap program
Edited on Wed Feb-08-06 06:52 PM by rawstory
The Republican Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee F. James Sensenbrenner (R-WI) has issued 51 questions to Attorney General Alberto Gonzales on President Bush's warrantless wiretap program.

The letter, issued to Gonzales today and acquired by RAW STORY, demands answers to myriad legal questions on the program, which involved eavesdropping on Americans' calls overseas. Sensenbrenner has given Gonzales a Mar. 2 deadline to respond.

Combined with a move by the chairman of a House subcommittee on intelligence, and hearings in the Senate, the move is likely to signal that Republicans are not going to swallow the President's justification for the surveillance, and may be a precursor to hearings in the House. Still, Sensenbrenner seems to leave room for accepting the taps, at one point referring to them as "terrorist surveillance," the Administration phrase for the program.

Strikingly, the letter to Gonzales quotes Harvard University professor Lawrence Tribe, a constitutional scholar who testified at unofficial hearings held by ranking Judiciary Democrat John Conyers (D-MI). In a letter to Conyers, Tribe wrote that the taps "far from being authorized by Congress, in the face of an explicit congressional prohibition and therefore unconstitutional."

MORE: http://rawstory.com/news/2005/Senior_House_Republican_wants_answers_on_0208.html

PDF of Sensenbrenner letter: http://judiciary.house.gov/media/pdfs/DOJNSA.pdf

(EDIT: added cautionary sentence, "Still, Sensenbrenner seems to leave room for accepting the taps, at one point referring to them as "terrorist surveillance," the Administration phrase for the program." which was revised in article)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-08-06 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. Republicans Investigating Themselves
how convenient.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-08-06 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. Uh oh, New name on Rove's black list!
Most of the time Sensenbrenner is a RW nut, but I congradulate him for demanding answers on this issue!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-08-06 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. More than likely a "Pre-Emptive Repug Strike" to get ahead of the issue
but probably means, too, that they are hearing alot of guff from their Repug constituents who want some answers. So, Sensenbrenner is trying to throw some water on the fire..hoping it will "SPIN AWAY," like everything else in the BUSH CRIME SCANDALS.

I would like to be hopeful...but having been slapped down so much...I fear my cynical view is probably the correct one. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-08-06 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. One thing on our side
is that even Republicans don't like the idea of being spied upon (except for those wingnuts who say they have nothing to hide). I'm sure that there are many repuke conmen who are getting some heat from their conservative constituents about the wiretaps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-08-06 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
5. Republicans trying to look good?
LOL!!!!

They have relinguished all they're power to THE thugs
and now they start to whine.

A tyrranny that they were accomplices of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-08-06 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
6. In so many words
"What angle are we pushing with this one, guys?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
7. kicked because I still can't believe Jimmy is asking W any questions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 12:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC