|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
sabra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-12-06 01:13 PM Original message |
Qwest Explains Why It Refused N.S.A. Query |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Missy M (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-12-06 01:17 PM Response to Original message |
1. Very interesting since I heard General Hayden today say.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anotherdrew (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-12-06 01:21 PM Response to Reply #1 |
7. gee you think he might be a LIER? He's just another PIG destroying america |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UpInArms (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-12-06 01:39 PM Response to Reply #1 |
11. from the USAToday article: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Missy M (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-12-06 01:44 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. Hayden is just another Bush administration liar...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Wielding Truth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-13-06 08:51 AM Response to Reply #12 |
48. He's a General and Bush is his Slavemaster. He must back |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cantstandbush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-12-06 02:38 PM Response to Reply #1 |
27. LET THE CLASS ACTION SUITS BEGIN!!!! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
survivor999 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-12-06 03:10 PM Response to Reply #27 |
31. Absolutely... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
survivor999 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-12-06 01:17 PM Response to Original message |
2. I think all people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-12-06 01:23 PM Response to Reply #2 |
9. I think Qwest refused to cooperate out of fear of future litigation, NOT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
survivor999 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-12-06 01:33 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. OK, nonetheless... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ladjf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-12-06 01:48 PM Response to Reply #9 |
14. What's wrong with that? Sounds like their lawyers had their |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-12-06 01:55 PM Response to Reply #14 |
17. Sure. All I am saying is that this was likely a business decision. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ladjf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-12-06 02:01 PM Response to Reply #17 |
19. I understood your valid point. My intention was to use your post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UpInArms (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-12-06 02:09 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. $130,000 fine per offense (from the USAToday article) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PassingFair (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-12-06 05:50 PM Response to Reply #21 |
42. Here's the thing about that article. Look at the attributions... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-12-06 02:11 PM Response to Reply #19 |
22. I think they wanted everyone on the same sheet of music, so they could |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Inland (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-12-06 02:27 PM Response to Reply #9 |
24. That's good enough for me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rhiannon12866 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-13-06 07:19 AM Response to Reply #9 |
46. Thank you for the explanation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-13-06 04:09 PM Response to Reply #46 |
53. Sadly, no. It used to be that employers cared about their employees |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rhiannon12866 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-13-06 04:33 PM Response to Reply #53 |
54. I agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UpInArms (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-12-06 02:06 PM Response to Reply #2 |
20. I checked - they are not in MO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no name no slogan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-12-06 04:05 PM Response to Reply #20 |
33. DON'T-- they're the WORST telco company in America |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rhiannon12866 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-13-06 04:36 PM Response to Reply #20 |
55. We switched from AT&T to Working Assets, last year. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no name no slogan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-12-06 02:45 PM Response to Reply #2 |
28. QWEST SUCKS-- don't switch for that reason |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
survivor999 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-12-06 03:09 PM Response to Reply #28 |
30. I cannot switch anyway, but... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no name no slogan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-12-06 03:56 PM Response to Reply #30 |
32. Start here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VirginiaDem (574 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-12-06 05:42 PM Response to Reply #32 |
41. As a former Qwest employee, or more precisely, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AnneD (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-13-06 11:05 AM Response to Reply #41 |
50. I find it interesting that Qwest... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no name no slogan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-13-06 12:53 PM Response to Reply #41 |
52. You have my deepest sympathies and admiration |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anotherdrew (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-12-06 01:18 PM Response to Original message |
3. but 62% of american's think lawlessness will make them safe, so shut up! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
C_U_L8R (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-12-06 01:18 PM Response to Original message |
4. How about they name a few names ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fshrink (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-12-06 01:19 PM Response to Original message |
5. Imagine that! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Julius Civitatus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-12-06 01:20 PM Response to Original message |
6. Interesting : Nacchio was a crook of a major order |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PassingFair (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-12-06 01:21 PM Response to Original message |
8. SEC flamed Qwest! Nacchio stepped down in 2002! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skelington (436 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-12-06 01:51 PM Response to Reply #8 |
15. Qwest stock fell from $65 to it's pathetic $7.50 now in part because , |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-12-06 02:00 PM Response to Reply #15 |
18. Yep, the date of the Carlyle sale is mightly close to when this data |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Up2Late (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-12-06 02:56 PM Response to Reply #8 |
29. Here's another News article from July 2002 about the Feds going... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PassingFair (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-12-06 04:35 PM Response to Reply #29 |
36. There is MUCH more here than meets the eye... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Up2Late (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-12-06 05:20 PM Response to Reply #36 |
39. I think you're right, check this other 2002 artical from the DBJ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PassingFair (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-12-06 05:28 PM Response to Reply #39 |
40. Now I'm flipping my tinfoil lid! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Up2Late (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-12-06 06:04 PM Response to Reply #40 |
43. This one is slightly off topic, but very relevant today... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
toopers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-12-06 01:45 PM Response to Original message |
13. What bothers me most about this . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BootinUp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-12-06 01:52 PM Response to Original message |
16. Do they offer service in the South? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Humor_In_Cuneiform (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-12-06 02:27 PM Response to Original message |
23. I already have Qwest! Yay for the good guys! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Inland (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-12-06 02:28 PM Response to Original message |
25. I imagine they asked for a warrent or subpoena to cover their asses. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barrett808 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-12-06 02:37 PM Response to Original message |
26. Just changed my long local and long distance service to Qwest |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no name no slogan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-12-06 04:10 PM Response to Reply #26 |
34. Just hope you don't try to cancel it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barrett808 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-13-06 10:48 AM Response to Reply #34 |
49. Thanks for the heads up. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PassingFair (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-12-06 04:17 PM Response to Original message |
35. kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoAmericanTaliban (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-12-06 04:58 PM Response to Original message |
37. Feds used loss of future gov't contracts to pressure phone companies |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Delphinus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-12-06 05:15 PM Response to Original message |
38. Why weren't the other company lawyers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
survivor999 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-12-06 08:30 PM Response to Original message |
44. Working Assets |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Moosepoop (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-13-06 06:12 AM Response to Reply #44 |
45. The phone companies SOLD our private info to the NSA??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-13-06 08:19 AM Response to Reply #44 |
47. Yes, and Mike Malloy has quoted several sources that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rasputin1952 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-13-06 12:39 PM Response to Original message |
51. I don't know the precise reason for Qwest's denial for records from |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BillORightsMan (921 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-26-06 11:38 PM Response to Original message |
56. Quest & Carlyle |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:13 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC