Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

High Court Won't Hear Generic Drug Case

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-26-06 01:50 PM
Original message
High Court Won't Hear Generic Drug Case
High Court Won't Hear Generic Drug Case
By ANDREW BRIDGES, Associated Press Writer

Monday, June 26, 2006

(06-26) 11:09 PDT WASHINGTON (AP) --

The Supreme Court refused Monday to hear an appeal of a drug patent case that antitrust officials hoped would speed access to cheaper generic versions of nearly a dozen popular medicines that now cost consumers more than $25 billion a year.

The Federal Trade Commission asked the high court to review a March 2005 decision by the Atlanta-based 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which ruled that settlements reached in lawsuits filed by the pharmaceutical company Schering-Plough Corp. against two companies challenging its patent on a drug did not violate antitrust law.

The FTC maintains that the increasingly popular settlements allow brand-name pharmaceutical companies to pay off generic drug manufacturers in exchange for delays in the introduction of lower-priced but otherwise identical versions of medicines.

The appeal pitted the FTC against the Justice Department, the other antitrust authority charged with reviewing the settlements. The Solicitor General urged the Supreme Court not to take the FTC's case, saying it didn't represent the proper opportunity to decide whether the settlements minimize unnecessary litigation or improperly restrain trade.
(snip/...)

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2006/06/26/national/w110930D12.DTL&type=politics
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-26-06 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well, that's because TODAY'S MEDICINES
FINANCE TOMORROW'S MIRACLES.....

Do I actually need to drag out that :sarcasm: thing?

Wouldn't it be nice if we spent our war dough on the war against diseases and illnesses?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lars39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-26-06 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. We must have seen the same commercial.
I didn't use to yell at the tv.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-26-06 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. So, I wasn't the only one hollering "HORSESHIT!" at the tube! n.t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-26-06 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. profits first!
<snip>

The Supreme Court decision not to hear the appeal could affect the outcome of litigation involving generic manufacturers seeking to introduce their own versions of the cholesterol-lowering drug Lipitor, blood-thinner Plavix, arthritis treatment Celebrex, heartburn medication Protonix and seven other of the 20 top-selling, brand-name drugs in the United States, according to the FTC.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Telly Savalas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-26-06 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. The members of the Supreme Court should chip in...
and buy a pool table for the FTC. If our esteemed judiciary isn't going to let the FTC do their jobs, then it becomes their responsibility to help keep the FTC occupied.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC