Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WP: Senators Gain (bipartisan) Momentum to Change Military Tribunal System

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-14-06 11:41 PM
Original message
WP: Senators Gain (bipartisan) Momentum to Change Military Tribunal System
Senators Gain Momentum to Change Military Tribunal System
Bipartisan Group Looking at Standard Military Law and Court-Martial Rules as Model for Commissions
By Jonathan Weisman
Washington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, July 15, 2006; Page A06

With the Bush administration divided and no clear voice emerging in the House, a bipartisan group of senators is gaining momentum to push through legislation that would create military tribunals based on standard military law and the rules of courts-martial, senators and House members said yesterday.

Several days of hearings on military tribunals revealed deep rifts in the administration -- between some White House officials and Justice and Defense Department lawyers, and between uniformed military personnel and civilian Pentagon appointees. Senators are ready to use those divisions to their advantage, marshaling their own authority and the clout of top military lawyers to make significant changes to a tribunal system created by President Bush following the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks that was rejected last month by the Supreme Court.

Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), who used his standing as a former tortured prisoner of war to pass legislation last year banning torture at U.S. detention facilities, will reprise that role as the face of the Senate's tribunal legislation. He in turn will defer to Sen. Lindsey O. Graham (R-S.C.), the Senate's only active military lawyer, on the substance of the bill.

Backing them will be Sen. John W. Warner (R-Va.), chairman of the Armed Services Committee, Sen. Carl M. Levin (Mich.), the committee's ranking Democrat, and Sen. Arlen Specter (R-Pa.), chairman of the Judiciary Committee.

"The idea of reauthorizing military commissions as written would be a mistake," said Graham, who helped organize Senate Armed Services Committee hearings Thursday that featured a parade of military judge advocates general counseling major changes to the tribunals. "I am very optimistic that we will reauthorize military commissions that are set up using (standard military law) as the model, but with substantial differences because the war on terror demands substantial differences."...

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/14/AR2006071401307.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
grytpype Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-14-06 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. But... how are they going to use this to attack the Dems?
It's the Republicans who are demanding regular military trials.

Looks like Rove lost this battle big time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-15-06 03:00 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Rove was no match for the SC who said the WH did not consult
with Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-15-06 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. a.m. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC