Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Saddam says his sentencing timed to boost Bush

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 11:47 AM
Original message
Saddam says his sentencing timed to boost Bush

http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/L0334331.htm

INTERVIEW-Saddam says his sentencing timed to boost Bush

AMMAN, Nov 3 (Reuters) - Saddam Hussein's defence team urged a delay on Friday of his possible death sentence and said the ousted Iraqi leader believed Sunday's expected verdict was timed to boost President George Bush before U.S. mid-term elections.

Chief lawyer Khalil al-Dulaimi said a letter was sent on Thursday asking the Iraqi High Tribunal trying the former president to delay delivering its verdict against him and his seven co-defendants charged with crimes against humanity.

Dulaimi repeated warnings that a death sentence against Saddam -- which would come before Tuesday's U.S. Congressional elections at a time when Bush faces mounting criticism over the Iraq war -- would plunge the region into wider bloodshed.

"We have requested at least a two-month adjournment to allow us to complete our presentations in the case in which our defence rights have been violated and in which our clients have been denied full legal defence," Dulaimi told Reuters in Amman.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. STFU, Saddam. We don't need any help from YOUR ass.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whoa_Nelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. About Saddam...
Edited on Fri Nov-03-06 12:24 PM by Whoa_Nelly
Some things that have bothered me ever since his capture...

He was clean shaven nine months before capture, yet was found with a beard that would have taken a lot longer to grow.
(scroll down to mail titled "Beard")
http://www.buzzflash.com/mailbag/03/12/mai03343.html

Have been looking online for references to what I THOUGHT I had read in the past about Saddam forbidding anyone under his reign were to NOT have beards at all, yet he kept the beard after capture.

Something about the photos of the Saddam on trial and the Saddam as president seem so different.

I have wondered all along if the Saddam on trial is the real Saddam...



But, what do I know... :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carni Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. IMO that IS definitely him
Not to be argumentative but look at the eyes...that's the real Saddam IMO

Although there were a number of fake Saddams running around Baghdad right before and during the invasion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whoa_Nelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Eyes? Something about the whole face doesn't add up for me
But like I said...what do I know... :shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hvn_nbr_2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #7
25. Only differences I see
The only differences I see are 1) his right eyebrow droops now 2) creases in the middle of his forehead have a different angle now. They go down to his left, and the old pictures show them (not very clearly) either horizontal or rising to his left.

Nose looks the same to me. Pouches under the eyes are the same. Creases between nose and cheeks are the same. Eyebrows are the same. Even the location of gray in the beard and mustache are identical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #7
29. It looks to me that he's lost a lot of weight. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
humbled_opinion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. You know I noticed serious changes to his apperance pre and post war too n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whoa_Nelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. And if you look at my post above yours here, check out his ears
Edited on Fri Nov-03-06 02:26 PM by Whoa_Nelly
Since when does getting captured make your ears go from being against your head to sticking out from your head? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happyslug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. The top photo is a profile, the other is a direct head shot.
Thus the ears will appear to stick out in the first one, and recede in the second. I am sorry the difference you mention are best explained in term of the style of the picture.

As to wearing a beard NOW, and not wearing a beard before the invasion, two possible explanations:

1. The US troops are NOT permitting him to have a razor, being afraid he may kill himself with the razor. More a concern before the invention of the Safety Razor in 1898, but it still may be in the Prison Manual being used in the prison holding Saddam.

2. Saddam is a smart politician. Before the Invasion he FEARED Al Queda and the Radical Fundamentalist Moslems. Mohammad told his followers to all grow bread and NOT to go clean shaven like the "Romans" (By which Mohammad meant the Eastern Roman Empire what is now called the Byzantine Empire). Since that date Beards have been a part of being "Moslem". Thus Saddam may be courting FUNDAMENTALISTS by leaving his beard grow out. When Saddam was in Power by being clean shaven (Except for his Mustache) he was showing his REJECTION of radical fundamentalist Islam.

Remember during his time on the run, he wanted to change his looks, a beard does that, when he was captured he was shaved and the pictures hit the airwaves. Even Saddam's domestic Enemies felt pity to him. Thus his beard today, represents two things, the REJECTION of his treatment when he was captured AND an embrace of at least a working arrangement with radical Islam. Thus by having a beard Saddam, without saying a thing, is telling his followers to work with Radical Islam, not against Radical Islam as Saddam followers had been doing prior to the US invasion of Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rosesaylavee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #10
23. And the nose is different. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kwassa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
15. I could grow a longer beard in nine months.
mine grows very fast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EnviroBat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Mine Has a Squirrel in it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. Having Iraq erupt further won't be good for repubs.
This would only work if they sentenced him by Monday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
humbled_opinion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Won't help our soldiers either...
I hope that the leadership has thought of this and is taking measures to protect them.. My God what makes me think that? Only a competent Administration would do that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mom cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #9
32. They repubs do not give a damn about what happens to our soldiers.
They have proven that beyond a doubt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cautiouslywaiting Donating Member (243 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. Since when
does anyone believe him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anakie Donating Member (935 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
13. who, Bush?
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cautiouslywaiting Donating Member (243 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #13
30. Well
I meant Saddam but the same could be asked of Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
5. ain't gonna work. riots, looting, attacks, madness... Iraq will explode on
Sunday when his verdict is read.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #5
18. Who says it's going to be read in Iraq?
Only on Fox News... It's an exclusive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
speedingbullet Donating Member (133 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
11. Wider Bloodshed?
Will we be able to tell if the region is plunged into wider bloodshed? Can that shit-hole get any worse?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. 7 US troops killed on Thrus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kwassa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
16. I think Saddam is right. Kinda like the sudden drop in gas prices ...
Bush is calling in his chips.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
macKenzie_1313 Donating Member (5 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
19. reply
Edited on Fri Nov-03-06 04:59 PM by macKenzie_1313
deleted
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrotherBuzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Oh, you edited your non sequitur post
Never mind....



Welcome to DU, enjoy your visit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuffleClaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
21. and they are exactly right too
this is just one more proof of this 'trial' being merely a us-led pr stunt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
22. of course, it's even obvious to Saddam
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IDemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
24. Chimp1 will make a very brief announcement, which I have written up for him
(eyes upward & slightly crossed, lips pursed)

"Today, the sovrin democratcy of Iraq convicted one of the worst criminals of our time, Sadd'm Hoosane. This shows that the gummint is working the way it should in Iran,,err..Iraq, due to the valiant efforts of our fightin' men 'n wimmin. The only way we as a nation kin continue to support the war effort is to vote straight republican tomorrow, or if yer a Democrat, vote ANY FRIKKIN' WAY YOU WANT IF IT'S ON A DIEBOLD MACHINE IF YOU GET MY DRIF...what, Karl? Oh, I mean...vote republican or the terrorists get free cable!! Heh heh. Goodnight."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. yup, rover bites, bush barks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Qutzupalotl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
27. This will be seen as the transparent political ploy that it is,
from an administration desperate to cover up its crimes.

Isn't is amazing that despite getting a new judge and having several lawyer changes, they were still able to finish "on schedule"?

Our response to the news: WAS IT WORTH IT?? How many thousands dead and wounded, and how many billions of dollars? For ONE GUY?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
28. He's probably right
So what?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
31. Of course it is.
Saddam knows a thing or two about executing people for political purposes without a fair trial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC