Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Army Times; Army denies patients face daily inspections

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
caligirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 01:59 PM
Original message
Army Times; Army denies patients face daily inspections
Edited on Thu Mar-01-07 02:35 PM by caligirl
By Kelly Kennedy - Staff writer
Posted : Thursday Mar 1, 2007 8:57:01 EST

Army officials are denying that soldiers in the Medical Hold Unit at Walter Reed Army Medical Center in Washington will have daily early-morning wakeup calls and room inspections.

But one Building 18 soldier said he woke up Tuesday morning to the sounds of sergeants pounding on doors and yelling, “Wake up! Wake up! Wake up!”

“I was like, ‘Jesus Christ, I’m back in basic training,’” the soldier said.

The soldier said the outpatient soldiers at Building 18 were issued garbage cans and cleaning supplies and told to keep their rooms clean and organized because of all the officials who would be making their way through the building during the investigation next week.>snip<

>The order not to “engage the media” sparked discussion on Capitol Hill.<

http://www.armytimes.com/news/2007/02/TNSreedinspectfolo070228/


Note that there is a hearing slated for March 5th at WR by house Subcommittee on National Security and Foreign Affairs on the Treatment of Wounded Soldiers at Walter Reed Army Medical Center
Monday, March 5, 2007, time to be announced, at Walter Reed Army Medical Center
They are trying to see if they can do a live web cast from off site. they still don't know if that will happen according to the subcommittee office person this morning.



EDIT: try this once:http://www.armytimes.com/news/


Now that Weightman's news is posted on the front page this story is now much lower on the page, you have to scroll down to Kelly Kennedy's name and her story. But there is a huge picture of Gen Weightman on the front page just now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
pennylane100 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. The Link no longer worked when I tried it.
I am sure it must be a technical problem :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. It was a technical problem
The OPs URL needs a trailing slash. When DU's automatic URL encoder doesn't work, placing them within a link works better: instructions are in the "HTML lookup table".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. Wasn't the source of the drill and media rules The Army Times?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caligirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Yes Kelly Kennedy is watching and reporting this in the army Times.
Looks like the press can do somethings well, its not like its easy to get a general fired.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eugene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. You'll need to embed the story link to make it work.
Edited on Thu Mar-01-07 02:28 PM by Eugene
Like so: Army Times link

The Army Times web server is strange that way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caligirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. that skill is one I don't have yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
7. Soldiers can speak to media, but not in gov't buildings-
...which has a certain nitpicky military "logic" to it.

snip>
Boyce said the soldiers may speak to the media, but only with permission if the interview takes place in a government building, such as Building 18. However, he said, if soldiers at Walter Reed want to talk with reporters down the street at a coffee shop, “that would be fine.”

Boyce also responded to a gag order issued to military spokespeople after extensive media reports on the problems facing troops in the Medical Hold Unit with both the medical evaluation bureaucracy and their living conditions.

In a message Tuesday, the Pentagon clamped down on media coverage of any and all Defense Department medical facilities, to include suspending queries for interviews and filming by CNN, saying in an e-mail to spokespeople titled “Media inquiries related to Walter Reed”: “It will be in most cases not appropriate to engage the media while this review takes place,” referring to an investigation of the problems at Walter Reed.
....
On Wednesday, Rep. Louise Slaughter, D-N.Y., issued a press release in which she said “any attempt to silence the very soldiers who brought their own mistreatment to light, or to hide ongoing abuses from the public eye — if such attempts are occurring — would be morally reprehensible. It would be an abdication of one of the most fundamental responsibilities of our government: the protection of those who have fought to protect us.”

At a Senate defense appropriations subcommittee hearing, Sen. Daniel Inouye, D-Hawaii, asked for an explanation about the order not to speak to the media after reading reports on the problems at Walter Reed in the Military Times newspapers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC