Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ralph Nader Sues Democratic Party

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 05:28 PM
Original message
Ralph Nader Sues Democratic Party
Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,,-7036571,00.html

Forgive me if this dupes:


WASHINGTON (AP) - Consumer advocate and 2004 independent presidential candidate Ralph Nader sued the Democratic Party on Tuesday, contending officials conspired to keep him from taking votes away from nominee John Kerry.

Nader's lawsuit, filed in District of Columbia Superior Court, also named as co-defendants Kerry's campaign, the Service Employees International Union and several so-called 527 organizations such as America Coming Together, which were created to promote voter turnout on behalf of the Democratic ticket.

The lawsuit also alleges that the Democratic National Committee conspired to force Nader off the ballot in several states.

``The Democratic Party is going after anyone who presents a credible challenge to their monopoly over their perceived voters,'' Nader said in a statement. ``This lawsuit was filed to help advance a free and open electoral process for all candidates and voters. Candidate rights and voter rights nourish each other for more voices, choices, and a more open and competitive democracy.''


http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,,-7036571,00.html

No link yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. Jeepers. Does this man crave attention? What's up with this? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. I think it's called
EGO. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. THAT'S the word!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #5
42. or Narcissistic Personality Disorder.
Hi maddezmom! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catch22Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. Only every 4 years
Other than that, he's content to let the repukes run the show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #12
22. now remember there's no difference between dems and republicans!
Edited on Tue Oct-30-07 06:12 PM by superconnected
Voting for Gore or GW would get the same results!

:sarcasm:

(at least that's what he told the green party back in '00 and they believed him...)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #12
26. It does seem like he enjoys throwing a wrench in the works, doesn't it. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
27. Pay attention to me! Pay attention to me! I'm still relevant! Hey, look, look, at me!!
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #27
34. I expect him to go into some sort of partnership with OJ
They share some personality (disorder) traits
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. I thought this might be interesting to people but I don't know how
long it will last before its gone with the wind. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. it seems to be his only justification for existing nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Der Blaue Engel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. Fuck you, Ralph. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mz Pip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
6. Uh, Ralphie
It's been like three years already. Give it up. Sorry you aren't get much attention this time around with Colbert hogging all the media attention. You really need to get some new material.

Mz Pip
:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zabet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
7. He is just a tool.
A repuke in an independent's clothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
8. Let's see...4 lawsuits going against the DNC now...who is funding them?
Have you thought about that?

The lawsuit by a member of the gay community who says Dean is violating his rights.

Bill Nelson and Alcee Hastings lawsuit against for stealing our vote.

Victor Dimaio, Tampa, his lawsuit similar to Nelson's.

And now Nader.

This is not usual is it?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
9. Unless there's an amendment passed, there will likely never be a viable third party in America.
That's the nature of SMDP voting. (Single-member district plurality) To win, you only need a plurality of the vote to win, not even a majority, so technically you can be elected even though a majority of voters didn't vote for you. Also, this means there is no such thing as a run-off election, which makes it even harder for third parties to become significant in America.

With mixed systems such as MMP represention or straight proportional representation, many people can gain a voice in the decision-making process, not just those who belong to Ds and Rs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
11. Guilty!
I conspired to withhold my vote from that unmitigated asshole.

I told every person within earshot, that Nader was a self-absorbed idiot, and anybody who would vote for him, even by accident, was a moron.

So sue me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TroglodyteScholar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
13. Gee, convenient timing, too...
Edited on Tue Oct-30-07 05:42 PM by Concerned GA Voter
...if anyone hasn't yet doubted ole Ralphie's motivations, this should be food for thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
14. Ralph ... you don't want to go there ...
there's about 50 million people or more who would just love to sue your sorry ass for Florida ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ben_meyers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
15. I still hate him for destroying the best car I've
ever owned!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roxnev Donating Member (194 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
16. Green your a$$
Is Nader still trying to convince the world that him pulling the green party vote, away from Kerry helped the forest. Why don't he come out of the Republican closet and say I am a Republican and always have been one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
17. Is it time for him reappear already?
How time flies when we're in between election cycles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
18. Put him in a Covair and tie him up and then start the car and wait for it to blow up.
Nader is a clown!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
disndat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
19. Didn't Nader admit
to taking money from the Republican Party to run against Gore in '00?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orangepeel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
20. "conspired to keep him from taking votes away from nominee John Kerry"
I swear I thought this was a joke.

But, well, then so is Nader. Only he's not funny. It is very sad that someone I once respected so much has turned out to be such an ego driven tool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohio2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
21. nothing stopping him from an '08 run is there?
He just has to have to follow the rules established for getting on the ballots of all 50 states.

....better start the petitioning now Raplhie ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #21
35. Sure there is. Even the GOP is bored with his shit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Earth_First Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
23. Hey Ralph...mind if I have my PIRG 'fees' associated with my student activity fees back?
Because it was beyond my knowledge that despite the fact that there was no PIRG on campus that money was siphoned off my student activity fees to the state level to support NYPIRG.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. I interviewed at PIRG, extremely low pay, months of no health benefits
About 10 years ago, and I told them I was interested but that I didn't think I could live on $10 with no health insurance and they said, "you could make it work".

I kid you not.

Many labor horror stories I hear are from people who worked for Ralph.

The man does not walk the walk, he should not accuse others of hypocrisy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
25. "contending officials conspired to keep him from taking votes away from nominee John Kerry"
Uh, yeah, it's called politics and it's an election campaign, not a game of tidily winks.

Should John Kerry sue the Republican Party for "conspiring" to deprive him of votes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
28. Lets laugh him out of court. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Lane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
29. I think this lawsuit is a good thing.
Assuming that the procedural rules are those typical in the U.S., it means that the defendants' lawyers have the right to depose Nader. Alas, that doesn't mean they can overthrow him from his spoiler/attention whore perch, but it does mean they can examine him. Under oath. With a court reporter present writing down his answers. And he can't brush them off or refuse to answer. If he gives some runaround dodge to use up the time, well, guess what -- there is no time limit and no debate moderator who'll move along to the next subject. The lawyer can ask the question again, and can ask as many follow-ups as are needed. If Nader doesn't cooperate, any disputed questions can be referred to a judge, and then Nader has to show up again to answer all the questions that the judge ruled were proper.

So, Ralphie-boy, start getting your records together about the Republicans who financed your campaign and helped you get on the ballot. ALL those inconvenient details are going to come out.

The power to take testimony isn't limited to examining Nader. Defendants' attorneys can subpoena nonparties who can reasonably be thought to have relevant information. That includes members of Nader's campaign staff and even people who had no connection with Nader.

Nader has named, as defendants, SEIU and various 527 groups, along with the DNC. One of the other defendants can go after him in ways that the DNC might find politically inconvenient. I hope at least one of the 527 groups will say, "There's no better service we can render to the progressive cause than to thoroughly discredit this cretin, even if some bloggers whine about how mean we're being."

The ultimate irony is that Nader, the self-righteous champion of individual empowerment, is bringing a SLAPP suit. The Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation is a suit brought against people who exercise their rights. It's designed to intimidate them, inconvenience them, and cost them money. In this case, part of the objective is surely to bring bad publicity upon the defendants. Many jurisdictions have SLAPP-back statutes that entitle the defendants in suits like this one to recover their attorneys' fees from the plaintiff. I hope D.C. has a SLAPP-back statute and the defendants can nail Nader for every goddam penny he and his organization have.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CBHagman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
30. I'll take "Whining narcissists" for 800, please, Alex.
Glad to know that Ralphus is busying himself with the needs of the American people. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
31. Did somebody say something?
I thought I heard a voice, but it might have just been the wind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
32. Nader is a total ass.
Eat Shit and DIE, Ralph. You and your fifth column can kiss my ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MasonJar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
33. Hey, dems, sue him back for his part in the destruction of our Constitution.
Both Bush and Gore are alike my broken finger!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libodem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
36. The man has obviously gone bat-shit
crazy. I used to respect him in the '70's. Thought he was an anti-pollution, god, of sorts. Now, I blame him for the melting polar ice caps, inflation, the recession, all the housing foreclosures, and the Iraq war. Why does he want to continue to cause death and destruction? Fuck Nader! Bastard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Haole Girl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-30-07 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
37. Get over yourself Ralph!
The rest of us have... a long time ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emillereid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 01:23 AM
Response to Original message
38. Actually I think the way the DNC tried to suppress his candidacy was
despicable -- we need more, not fewer, choices as he says. I think the DNC really does believe it could have had all the votes that might go to Nader -- and I know that's not true -- I know many a Green and other progressives who would never vote for the democrat - unless that democrat was actually progressive -- not many of them, I'm afraid.

I on the other hand generally suck it up, hold my nose and vote for the lesser one. I think Ralph is an amazing, unselfish, committed activist who really cares more for our democracy than for 'party.' I think the democratic party's treatment of him since the 2000 election has been horrible --he was not to blame for the Bush presidency!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MilesColtrane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 01:31 AM
Response to Original message
39. Not surprised...
...that Nader is suing a union.

He undertook hardball union busting techniques when his own employees tried to unionize.

What a shitheel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 06:55 AM
Response to Original message
40. Oops - it's campaign season and the spotlight isn't on Ralph.
How predictable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JaneQPublic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
41. Is the GOP bankrolling his lawsuit like it did his campaign? (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libodem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-31-07 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #41
43. I hardly doubt it
Gotta wonder what Rove is doing with all his spare time?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC