Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Democrats say Shadegg (R-Ariz.) violated law

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 01:13 PM
Original message
Democrats say Shadegg (R-Ariz.) violated law
Source: The Arizona Republic

The Arizona Democratic Party is accusing Republican U.S. Rep. John Shadegg of using his political-action committee to skirt laws that limit the amount of money donors can give a candidate.

<snip>

Two Valley businessmen who made the maximum allowable individual donations to Shadegg's campaign in 2007 also wrote additional $5,000 checks to Shadegg's PAC, Leadership for America's Future. Eleven days later, on June 26, the PAC wrote two identical $5,000 checks to Shadegg.

Normally, such a transfer would not be noticed among thousands of dollars in contributions. But in the same reporting period, Shadegg's PAC received no other contributions and paid out only the $10,000.

Democrats accused Shadegg of using the PAC to avoid laws that prohibit donors from giving more than $2,300 to a candidate's re-election campaign in an election cycle.



Read more: http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/local/articles/0121shadegg0121.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well of course he broke the law.
Edited on Mon Jan-21-08 01:19 PM by fasttense
The bushes have proven that laws don't matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. After All, He's a GOPper!
That's their platform!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. Hmmm wonder what the Republican controlled FEC or Republican
Judges will say about this... Will we be listening to crickets chirping?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. guess he didn't pay attention to the DeLay case
where skirting donation laws by giving to a PAC and then laundering that same money back (in DeLay's case it was between PACS but the scheme was along the same lines).

Idiot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-21-08 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
5. Candidates or their proxies should not be allowed to have PACs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC