Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Oil Falls Below $38 - OPEC Cut Ignored

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Purveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 11:34 AM
Original message
Oil Falls Below $38 - OPEC Cut Ignored
Source: CNN Money

Slowing global economy and waning fuel demand continue to weigh on market.

Last Updated: December 18, 2008: 10:26 AM ET

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Oil prices fell below $40 a barrel Thursday, reaching levels not seen since June 2004.

Investors continued to shrug off an upcoming OPEC production announced on Wednesday, after which oil closed at a 4 1/2 year low.

U.S. crude for January delivery, which ceases trading on Friday, fell $2.10 to $37.96 a barrel in early trading, but not before touching a trading low of $37.71. The February contract, which begins its front-month run next week, fell $1.50 to $43.11.

On Wednesday, the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries, an international trade organization whose members supply about 40% of the world's oil, elected to cut production by 2.2 million barrels a day in January.

But investors were concerned about the slowing global economy's impact on crude demand, and that sent the price down $3.54 to $40.06 a barrel Wednesday, its lowest close since July 2004.

"They're wondering whether OPEC can enforce this cut," because the budgets of many OPEC nations are already stretched incredibly thin, said Nimit Khamar, analyst with Sucden Financial in London.

Read more: http://money.cnn.com/2008/12/18/markets/oil/index.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. Hopefully, those nations in OPEC were thrifty and saved some of the $$'s they gouged out of us
Because here in the US I don't see demand rising any time soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Dubai is refrigerating beaches
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Ooh, nice... maybe they can use melting polar cap ice?
Just sayin'...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
2. There goes the R and D.
Edited on Thu Dec-18-08 11:42 AM by Skink
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
3. Slowing economy and demand?
It seems more likely this is mostly a result of the speculation money drying up, and now we're back to a real market price. There was no "demand" a year ago that would explain the insane prices we were seeing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frank Cannon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #3
20. You are absolutely right
And I haven't seen a single corporate media talking head talk about the major role that speculation played in our being fucked at the pump for so long. Even the peak oil end-timers on this board, who saw us running out of oil within months, are pretty much changing the subject and pretending the whole thing never happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bhikkhu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. In retrospect we'll probably find that oil production peaked in summer
...looking at the production figures. There was a plateau for about a year and a half at 84 mbpd or so, which jumped to a new plateau in Nov 2007 at 85 mbpd. Expected production cuts will take that number down quite a bit, and it seems likely now that the new oil production scheduled for 2009-2010 will be less than what is being shut down currently.

Volatility is inherently very bad for the oil business, as far as production goes. The same thing happened in the early eighties when the bottom dropped out of the price and exploration, production, maintenance, etc, all slumped. Most of the projects that are capable of offsetting natural declines are huge investments made over the course of years, that tend to get delayed or mothballed when neither price nor demand can be guessed with any likelihood.

I suppose I would be a "peak-oiler", as the perspective of needing to plan alternatives to a declining resource seems very sensible. I would interpret the current situation as an example of severe market dysfunction - oil priced lower than production costs - and we will probably have its alternate form again in a year or two - oil many prices at many times its production cost. Two different modal positions of an energy economy ratcheting its way down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enid602 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
4. prices
OPEC production cut anouncements are generally not immediately followed by price reductions. It takes a while. With the Euro rising (from $1.24 to $1.44 in two weeks) so rapidly, you can bet that prices will go back up soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fearless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
5. The beginning of deflation...
Buy what you really need/can afford now, soon you won't be able to get it at all even if you have the money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tjahome Donating Member (16 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
6. Cartels are interesting
The problem with collusion in order to price control is thus: you only choose to decrease production and therefore increase price when the price is too low. When the price is too low, the oil producing countries are experiencing a decline in revenue. However, in order to increase prices, those very countries need to allow revenue to decline even further (sell less of the now lower priced commodity). This very situation tests the gumption of the cartel, as some members (Venezuela, Iraq) may not be in a financial position to decrease production, and by refusing to do so face sanction or expulsion from OPEC.

What worries me about this is the fact that diplomatically we (the US) do not have any input here. Furthermore, OPEC nations have less control today than in the 1980's, with China now a net exporter of oil, and the Russian inability to turn off wells because of temperature problems.

In a nutshell, my rambling post can be reduced to this: I don't think OPEC can survive this time. There are traders already questioning the willingness of the partners to go along with the cut.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baby Snooks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
8. A planned economic collapse?
The only countries that have managed to survive the economic collapse, and it is an economic collapse, are the OPEC countries. There is something wrong when oil drops $100 a barrel within six months that has nothing to do with supply and demand. The market is being manipulated and it may be that someone is manipulating in order to collapse the economies of the OPEC countries as well. And before anyone tells me to put on a tin hat, think about it. Demand has not fallen that much to justify such an enormous drop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucky Luciano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. well, demand has dropped...
every week the DOE puts out numbers showing how much the supply has been increasing (A LOT!) Now the supply is so high that oil is being stored on tankers since there is nowhere else to put it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blaze Diem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. We wear matching tinfoil hats. I am in agreement with your post.
Its been planned since Bush's pre-selection.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
10. And the Cheney energy task force washes its hands and walks away,
saying "My job is done."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sex Pistol Donating Member (257 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
13. Good news. Cheap oil will help businesses that use a lot of fuel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arctic Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. The problem is that companies that use a lot of fuel are service companies.
If people can't afford the service, who cares what the price of fuel is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
okieinpain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. good point, I think the higher prices earlier this year helped push
the country into going belly up, now the opec countries are paying the price for their greed. hahahaha, baby eat too much candy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sex Pistol Donating Member (257 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Yes, but we all have to eat. And fuel is prerequisite when it comes to delivering food.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arctic Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-19-08 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. The more exotic the food the more fuel is used to deliver it.
Less money, less exotic the food. Think lobster or kiwi.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sex Pistol Donating Member (257 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-08 07:14 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. I don't consider fresh vegetables and fruit to be exotic, do you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arctic Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. Depends on were they are from and how long of a trip it took to get to were you are at.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohio2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-21-08 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. harvest time in S America
Crops are coming north at a reduced cost and that is good news to those farmers who won't see crops rot due to prohibitive transportation costs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arctic Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-08 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. I guess they could keep them local and feed their population.
But really, who am I trying to kid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohio2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-25-08 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. the farmer can can afford to pay more harvesters if they accept the highest offer for their crops
and get more produce out of their fields....
In the meantime, oil is falling into the $20 bbl range;

http://english.eluniversal.com/2008/12/24/en_ing_esp_venezuelan-oil-close_24A2176015.shtml


meaning more prosperity for the farmer and shipper to spread the penny's further.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=102&topic_id=3314134&mesg_id=3314331
I could be wrong but the economy also starts from the ground up unless farmers should be forced to accept prices fixed by the state
http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/05/18/america/18venez.php

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-25-08 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
25. haha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dyedinthewoolliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-25-08 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
26. All those who think we're being
manipulated raise their hands :mad:
How could gas be $4.00 plus per gallon about 60 days ago and yesterday I filled up for $1.70?
It stinks and argues for spending public money on efficient,passenger friendly mass transit. Unfortunately, that won't happen during any of our life times....... :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC