Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Blago seeks to have Fitzgerald removed from case

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
BlueJessamine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 09:40 PM
Original message
Blago seeks to have Fitzgerald removed from case
Source: Chicago Sun-Times

Gov. Blagojevich is asking a judge to kick U.S. Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald off of his corruption case, the governor’s lawyer said today.

Sheldon Sorosky said they're seeking to have Fitzgerald removed because of remarks he made during a Dec. 9, 2008 news conference announcing charges against the governor.

Fitzgerald at the time called Blagojevich's conduct — which included allegedly trying to sell President-elect Barack Obama’s vacant Senate seat — “appalling.”

Assistant U.S. Attorney Ed Chang called Blagojevich's move “meritless.”



Read more: http://www.suntimes.com/news/metro/blagojevich/1368461,blagojevich-fitzgerald-corruption-case-010809.article



from ABC Chicago:


Attorneys for the governor have filed a motion - that was under seal - asking that U.S. Attorney Pat Fitzgerald and all of his assistants on the Blagojevich matter be removed from the case. They contend that the announcement and details of the Blagojevich arrest last month was filled with inflammatory, prejudicial comments.

Link:

http://abclocal.go.com/wls/story?section=news/politics&id=6594066
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hmmm. . . it was pretty inflammatory. This will be interesting. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonAnn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. Can't say I blame him. I wouldn't want Fitzpatrick after me, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MidwestTransplant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Or Fitzgerald either, for that matter!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nevergiveup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. Free Blago!
There is obviously no evidence that Abe Lincoln actually turned over in his grave.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
5. This isn't the Onion! Seems like an endorsement for Fitz if you ax me. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-08-09 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
6. I really wonder about this case. Blag has a chance here. It's pretty amazing.
I don't know what to say about it, either. I can't decide if he seems like he should be going down for this or if they should have got him on something where they really had a case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GinaMaria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. we have speedy trial motions in Illinois
but I don't think we have speedy indictment rules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 12:52 AM
Response to Original message
7. According to many DUers who idolize the Mighty Fitzmas, Blago was supposed to be indicted this week
Guess that fizzled, like virtually everything else the Fitzmas lovers have waited for with baited breath...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
8. Fitzgerald's comments WERE out of line and the judge should at least caution him.
Not sure it justifies removal, however.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueJessamine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-09 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
9. Patrick Fitzgerald violated the rules with pretrial publicity:
an excerpt from The Southern.com

Chief defense counsel Edward M. Genson filed the motion to have U.S. Attorney Patrick J. Fitzgerald thrown off the case, it was disclosed at the hearing.

He charged in the motion that Fitzgerald violated the rules with pretrial publicity at a Dec. 9 news conference announcing the charges against Blagojevich and his former chief of staff John Harris.

The motion was filed under seal and not immediately available from the court clerk's office but was described by Chief Judge James F. Holderman of U.S. District Court and another Blagojevich defense attorney, Sheldon Sorosky.

The motion sought Fitzgerald's ouster from the case ``because of the statements he made in announcing the arrest of Gov. Blagojevich,'' Sorosky said.

``He violated the rules of the American Bar Association,'' Sorosky said.

Blagojevich, 52, is charged among other things with plotting to sell or trade the U.S. Senate seat left vacant by the election of Barack Obama as president.

While Sorosky was not specific about the contents of the motion, Fitzgerald said at the news conference that the governor had been on ``a political corruption crime spree'' and ``the conduct would make Lincoln roll over in his grave.''


Link:

http://www.southernillinoisan.com/articles/2009/01/08/breaking_news/doc4966b1d74f6ba909437674.txt

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC