Dutch to investigate own support for Iraq invasion

[sabra]

Source: Reuters

AMSTERDAM, Feb 2 (Reuters) - Dutch Prime Minister Jan Peter Balkenende ordered on Monday an independent commission to examine the government's decision to support the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq in 2003.

The Netherlands did not send troops into Iraq but supported the U.S. push to invade Iraq because of the threat of weapons of mass destruction, which was later found to be unjustified.

Dutch critics of the war say the government put the country, which is hosts several international courts, at legal risk.

...

The commission, headed by former chief of the Dutch Supreme Court Willibrord Davids, will investigate whether the government heeded findings from its own lawyers over the legality of the invasion.

The commission is due to release its report in November.

Read more: http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/L2241143.htm

---

from a few weeks ago:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=102&topic_id=3696591

New revelations on invasion of Iraq - Dutch officials withheld memo questioning legality of war

January 17th, 2009 • SP Foreign Affairs specialist Harry van Bommel wants the government to comment on the report in the leading Dutch daily NRC-Handelsblad that a meeting of top foreign affairs officials in April 2003 deliberately withheld from the Foreign Minister a legal advice note critical of the Netherlands' political support for the war on Iraq. In the note, leading civil servants argue that the government's standpoint is wrong-headed. “At the Ministry of Defence there were serious doubts about the lawfulness of the invasion of Iraq,” said Van Bommel. “The Foreign Minister always spoke out against such doubts. This revelation underlines the need for a parliamentary enquiry. No stone should be left unturned.”

According to the official memorandum acquired by NRC-Handelsblad, the Netherlands' standpoint put the government at risk of being prosecuted by the International Court of Justice. The most senior official involved suppressed the advice note with the words “file away for posterity in the archives.” As Van Bommel sees it, “the minister has a problem, one way or another. Either his highest official has kept an important advice note from him, or he knew about it but decided to ignore it.”

Van Bommel has put a series of parliamentary questions to the minister in an attempt to find out which of these explanations comes closest to the truth.

[Solly Mack]

1. K&R

[ixion]

2. we need an investigation like that in the US

because the illegal invasion was bogus, and there are many of us who know that.