Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Marine One Upgrade Now Looks Less Likely

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-09 08:57 AM
Original message
Marine One Upgrade Now Looks Less Likely
Source: Washington Post

Tuesday, February 24, 2009; Page A05

The prospects for building a new fleet of high-tech presidential helicopters darkened yesterday, after the new commander in chief called the costly Bush administration effort an example of military procurement "gone amok" and said he thinks the existing White House helicopter fleet "seems perfectly adequate."

President Obama's remarks at the opening of a meeting with lawmakers on fiscal responsibility did not rule out finishing the program, now expected to cost more than $11.2 billion, or nearly twice the original estimate. He joked that he has not had a helicopter before, so perhaps "I've been deprived and I -- I didn't know it."

But Obama's disclosure that he had asked Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates to conduct a "thorough review of the helicopter situation" amounted to a shot across the bow of large defense contractors such as Lockheed Martin, the helicopter's manufacturer. In recent years, contractors have experienced multiple cost overruns -- totaling $300 billion on the 95 largest military programs, according to the Government Accountability Office -- without incurring substantial penalty.

Billions of dollars have been spent to develop the VH-71 helicopter fleet, which is meant to replace the iconic Sikorsky Marine One helicopters the White House has used for a quarter-century. But technical problems -- the aircraft weighs too much and is to be outfitted with sophisticated electronic gear that has not yet been developed -- have repeatedly forced the program's restructuring, and in recent months, the Pentagon ordered key work halted to reassess its design and necessity.



Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/02/23/AR2009022302574.html?hpid=moreheadlines
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-09 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
1. Aviation buffs will surely weigh in
...but I seem to recall Sikorskys being just shy of legend in the reliability column? Or am I making that up in my head?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
awoke_in_2003 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-09 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. If I ever have to fly in a helicopter...
I would want it to be a Sikorsky.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-09 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. Delete "just shy of" from your comment
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
randr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-09 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
2. Check this post
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-09 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
3. This is bullshit. Especially one big lie...
>snip>

Lockheed Martin, the helicopter's manufacturer...

<snip>

Read this:

What did the Berlusconi government get in return for providing the Bush administration with a convenient "smoking gun" to attack Iraq? At the end of the yellowcake trail may be the prestigious contract an Italian firm won to manufacture Marine One -- the fleet of presidential helicopters. In January 2005, the U.S. Navy awarded the contract for the construction of 23 new Marine One helicopters to AgustaWestland. Marketing itself as an Anglo-Italian firm, AgustaWestland is wholly owned by Finmeccanica, Italy's largest defense conglomerate.

The choice of AgustaWestland for Marine One surprised most industry observers because U.S.-based Sikorsky Aircraft Corp. was the heavy favorite. Sikorsky patented the first helicopter design in 1939 and built virtually every president's helicopter since 1957. President Eisenhower regularly flew in a Sikorsky to his Gettysburg farm, and the Sikorsky that Nixon boarded when he resigned from the White House is now being restored for permanent display at the Nixon Library.

Not only did Sikorsky lose, but it lost to a foreign firm that has no problems selling its helicopters to the United States' adversaries. (See side bar, "Choppers for Sale, to Everyone")

As with the yellowcake dossier, the key figure in the Marine One contract is Gianni Castellaneta. When the Pentagon put the Marine One contract out for bid, Castellaneta was deputy chair of Finmeccanica and national security advisor to Prime Minister Berlusconi. By the time the contract was awarded, Castellaneta had been appointed Italy's ambassador to the United States.

Castellaneta proudly told U.S. Italia Weekly, "At noon President Bush received me for the official delivery of credentials. He didn't make me wait a single day. An exceptional courtesy."

Castellaneta's role in obtaining the Marine One contract has never been examined before, but according to Affari Italiani, Italy's first online daily, and disarmo.org, an Italian arms control advocacy group, Castellaneta has long managed the most sensitive dossiers in U.S.-Italian bilateral relations.

When Ambassador Castellaneta was asked about his role, the embassy press officer, Luca Ferrari said, "In his capacity as ambassador, representing all of Italy in the United States, the ambassador does not care to speak any more about Finmeccanica."

"Castellaneta's double role as ambassador and corporate businessman has come under scrutiny at various junctures," says Carlo Bonini, an Italian journalist who has extensively investigated the yellowcake affair. "His duality has inspired animated debate in the Italian Parliament, but due to the absolute majority of seats held by Berlusconi, the matter could never be fully discussed."

With center-left opposition leader Romano Prodi taking the helm of Italy's new government, the newly reconfigured Parliament is expected to open a probe into the "Yellowcake One" affair. For Italians, the main question is whether Berlusconi personally profited from the helicopter deal. For Americans, the question is whether the Bush administration paid the Italians back for providing the false intelligence that helped justify launching the war in Iraq.
http://news.ncmonline.com/news/view_article.html?article_id=e5f90f38b05836fede6d7b5a217b3a40
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JPZenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-09 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Lockhead Martin was front even though they never made helicopters
Lockhead Martin was the front man for this deal, even though they never made a helicopter before.

Yes, this deal was a pay off to the Italian Government to send a couple thousand troops into Iraq for a couple years.

I'm sure King George made all kinds of incredibly expensive secret deals to get token troops from many nations into Iraq.

We need to set an example with some defense contractors - if you don't act responsibly, you are out. I'm sure Sikorsky or Boeing could add modern electronics and defensive measures to an existing platform.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-09 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. How big does the president's helicopter have to be?
If the answer is "pretty damn big," Boeing makes the CH-47 Chinook. If our friends at the White House were to call Boeing and tell them, "we need two zero-hour Chinooks for the President right away," Boeing will make them two new shithooks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nichomachus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-09 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
5. But if McCain had gotten in
the GOP would be demanding he have nothing but the finest helicopter fleet and would call any Democrat who questioned it a terrorist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dont_Bogart_the_Pretzel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-09 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Got that right!
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Born_A_Truman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-09 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
6. How old is the current fleet?
Safety needs to be addressed but I wonder if that even crossed McCain's mind. This fleet gets quite a workout.

The current helicopters have aging airframes, having entered service with HMX-1 in 1962. VH-3D replaced some VH-3A in 1978, and the remainder of VH-3A were replaced by VH-60N beginning in 1989. Due to the age of the VH-3D, a replacement type is in development, with initial operational capability due by 2008 and full operational capability by no later than 2014.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-09 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
7. Westland, affectionately known as...
"...those bastards from Yeovil" in my corner of the US aerospace industry. My company tried to get some work with them a few years ago on the same helicopter they are flogging as Marine One. No deal. They just listened to a lot of demos, had a lot of meetings, figured out what we were doing, then went off and did their own version. Which is pretty common in the world aerospace industry, admittedly. At least I did OK in the deal, getting to spend a few weeks in the UK on somebody else's money. Also France, with Those Bastards From Toulouse--Aerospatiale.

Further down in the article: The Engineer, another British trade journal, described the chopper as "a re-branded version of the EH-101, already in use in the UK, Italy, Japan and Canada and firmly European in heritage."

The EH-101 is affectionately known as the "Flying Barn." All the Presidential electronic gear should fit into that monster.

Someone else may have better updates, but the world helicopter industry has been interesting since the early 90's, when the Dutch suddenly and mysteriously acquired the AH-64 attack helicopter. I remember an intense competition over that contract. The European companies desperately tried to lock out the U.S., since it was assumed that the first contract in the Netherlands would cause all the other Euro-dominoes to fall the same way. The Dutch deal seemed to come out of nowhere and a lot of people were very pissed off about it. Well, a lot of European people, at least.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC