Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Shell's executive pay plan voted down in shareholder rebellion

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 08:28 AM
Original message
Shell's executive pay plan voted down in shareholder rebellion
Source: Financial Times

Shell's executive pay plan voted down in shareholder rebellion

By Kate Burgess in London and Michael Steen in Amsterdam

Published: May 20 2009 03:00 | Last updated: May 20 2009 03:00

A global investor backlash over executive pay escalated yesterday when shareholders turned on Royal Dutch Shell, the multinational oil group, and voted against its executive pay plan.

In one of the biggest investor rebellions over directors' pay, about 59 per cent of Shell shareholders voted down the company's remuneration report.

They objected to the discretionary award to executive directors of bonuses for 2006-08 performance, which were made even though the company failed to meet targets.

The scale of the 'No' vote was strong evidence of the growing anger over remuneration and bonuses among shareholders, who have been criticised by regulators and politiciansin the wake of the financial crisis for failing to hold boards to account.

Read more: http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/6e5fa018-44d7-11de-82d6-00144feabdc0.html?nclick_check=1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. It's about damn time! The shareholders are the only ones who can
legally force this issue onto the greedy execs, and the more often we see shareholders respond NO!!!! the more pressure there will be on the other companies who were and are doing the same thing!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. The gubbamint can force it on those who took bailout money, too. It just won't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aragorn Donating Member (784 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. unless and until
the government BECOMES a/the shareholder(s). I predict that will change things overnight. And it's the proper legal way.

Lots of shareholders don't seem to care what the company does or how it does it as long as they get nice premiums.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
able1 Donating Member (97 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
3. Well glory be. It's almost greed free. Good on them. EOM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. I would say the opposite
Shareholders are the boss and the boss wants the money. They don't want it to go to executives that don't perform to the extreme. This is pretty astounding to me since the oil companies have produced record profits for six consecutive years now..Apparently these shareholders want some of that money..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Salviati Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
4. While I feel a bit uneasy about a plan to legally limit executive pay
Edited on Wed May-20-09 09:43 AM by Salviati
(mainly because I think it would be too expensive politically for what it's worth) I am completely in favor of requiring shareholder approval for executive pay. I think that there would be a lot of howling about that too, but ultimately less effective opposition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. The world would be a better place with limited executive pay. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Then Eliminate the Executives
Surely all that overhead isn't required for daily or even year to year operations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC