Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Palin implicated in ethics probe

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 03:32 PM
Original message
Palin implicated in ethics probe
Source: AP

AP NewsBreak: Palin implicated in ethics probe

ANCHORAGE, Alaska – An independent investigator has found evidence that Gov. Sarah Palin may have violated ethics laws by accepting private donations to pay her legal debts.

The report obtained by The Associated Press says Palin is securing unwarranted benefits and receiving improper gifts through the Alaska Fund Trust, set up by supporters.

An investigator for the state Personnel Board says in his July 14 report that there is probable cause to believe Palin used or attempted to use her official position for personal gain because she authorized the creation of the trust as the "official" legal defense fund.

The fund aims to help Palin pay off debts stemming from multiple ethics complaints against her, most of which have been dismissed. Palin says she owes more than $500,000 in legal fees.

A call seeking comment from her lawyer was not immediately returned.

Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090721/ap_on_re_us/us_palin_ethics_complaint_3
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SharonRB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. No one told me today was Groundhog Day! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
livetohike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. "We do it different up here."
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IDFbunny Donating Member (530 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
67. "We don't care how they do it in the lower 48,
we won't raise our standards for anybody".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Steerpike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 07:18 AM
Response to Reply #67
79. It's very ironic.
Edited on Wed Jul-22-09 07:53 AM by Steerpike
In years past very little unethical behavior was examined in Alaska, becouse state laws were pretty lax. But, Palin changed all that and against the grumblings of the state legislature pushed through new ethics regulations. These same ethics regs are now being used against her. Altho, she does appoint the Personnel board and so far they have found in her favor in most of the charges that have been looked into.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thor_MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
76. Has it been warmer than normal in Alaska?
Because it's been colder than normal here in MN, and often Alaska and Minnesota are opposite in direction from "normal".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Steerpike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 07:14 AM
Response to Reply #76
78. It had been warmer for a couple of weeks.
Sunny and hot with temps up to 80 degrees. But, this last week it's cooled down. We are actually entering our "Fall". Cloudy and gray skies with temps in the lo 60's and scattered showers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 04:47 AM
Response to Reply #2
77. She's just progressing her bank account!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sfwriter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. She was just saving the taxpayers money!
She set this argument up in her surprise departure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stlsaxman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #3
88. yeah- saving it in her off shore checking account.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
4. I am not sure I understand why asking people to help you pay for your legal fees is wrong
Scooter Libby had a defense fund.

I am no fan of either Sarah or Scooter, but I see nothing wrong with people contributing of their own free will. Couldn't her family and friends help her out if they wanted? If so, why not her fans?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Scooter wasn't elected and he didn't have a state budget for ethics complaints.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #7
23. I don't think either of those answers the questions why it is wrong for her
friends, family or fans to donate money to help her with her legal fees. Now, if she collects more than her fees and keeps the money, that would be a problem. Or, if her fees were not really what she said they were. But, choosing her own attorney and asking people to help her pay the fees? I don't see the horror in that alone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #23
33. They have laws
you might think it is wrong not to sell wine in the supermarket but in some states - you can't buy because it is against the law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bette Noir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #23
42. An elected official can only accept money for campaign expenses,
and that only within carefully specified limits. If a crooked politician can have anybody donate for any reason, how is that different from bribery? Or, given Ms. Palin's history of vendetta against those she dislikes, extortion?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PainPerdu Donating Member (93 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #23
70. Ensign's Parents are generous
Maybe they could help Sarah out....did she have an overniter on C Street,btw?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. Scooter Libby....
...was not an elected governor of a state who have their own lawyers already hired and paid-for, and on-staff. And whose salaries are paid for with the public's tax dollars. Sarah Palin "chose" not to utilize the Attorney General for the state of Alaska because the legislature wouldn't approve the appointment the one she picked (a racist and incompetent bastard), in addition to the fact that all legal records coming from the Attorney General's Office would ultimately be subject to public disclosure. On the other hand, if she hires her own attorneys, then any information that's released is left to her discretion.

- this is NOT something one wants in a so-called "accountable public official...."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #11
22. In any event, choosing her own counsel was legal. So, why can't people help her pay for her fees,
if they so choose?

I do believe that, as a principle, people have a right to counsel of their own choosing, especially when charged with wrongdoing. I also believe in the attorney client privilege.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #22
44. Oh and I agree.
- I just don't think it's ethical. Which is always the case with Sarah though, now isn't it? Although I will say that I would also be miffed if I believed people (not from my state) ended up assisting someone financially, just so that they could subvert our laws.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalLovinLug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #22
75. This is the reason it should be illegal
You are equating it with pals coming over to help her move (to Washington) for a case of beer.

But once you are a big shot politician you shouldn't be accepting any money for anything outside of legal campaign donations.
The reason is that say you are a big shot bridge builder and you want the state to help finance your bridge to nowhere. Too bad there isn't any campaign going on at the moment so you can grease a few wheels. Then you hear about poor Sarah's legal problems, and voila! you make a nice big noticeable donation. For the sake of argument we could assume Mr. Bridgebuilder did not know about her impending resignation. Of course she has still 3 weeks sign a few papers. Sarah remembers her friends as well as her enemies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #22
87. Because if she wasn't resigning, then the people paying in would be
in a position to ask her for favors as Governor (or any other elected official).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Steerpike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #87
89. the reason it may be illegal
is becouse she declared it the "official" fund. She hasn't even taken any money out of the fund. And, apparently she never will. The money will probobly be returned. These were donations made by individuals with a cap of 150 dollars. In fact if she does all thease things she will just have to pay a fine and all of this will go away. She will pay a fine and by this time next year she will be rolling in the dough to the tune of millions of dollars. After she dissolves this fund and resigns she can turn around and start another fund and this time keep the money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #11
37. Dude, you just wrote the REAL story here
Once again, the GOP uses security by obscurity...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #37
58. What's so bad about it though....
...is that it still works at all.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
34. I don't understand why she needed it, since the state was paying to defend her. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raspberry Donating Member (377 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #4
48. I don't understand either
Bill Clinton had a legal defense fund. Was that legal? If so, what's the difference with Palin?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-10-09 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #48
91. Palin is an idiot. Bill Clinton was a Rhodes scholar. Typical comparison.
Right wingers are uneducated idiots, immoral and just plain fucked up. They should be kicked out of the county, like you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jhrobbins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
69. It's not a matter of whether or not you understand it or even think it wrong or Ok-
it is agin Alaska law and that's the dealio.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Steerpike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 07:24 AM
Response to Reply #4
80. Good Question
Edited on Wed Jul-22-09 07:56 AM by Steerpike
The finding to the Personnel board is that there is probable cause to proceed with an investigation. Sarah has not been found guilty of anything yet. The board has yet to examine the findings and then determine if an investigation is even warranted.
This preliminary finding was illegally leaked. But, there is no mechanism to punish people who leak these preliminary documents. And, so, people get the mistaken impression that there is something here...when in reality it's just smoke and mirrors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Soylent Brice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
5. is this the other shoe???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #5
16. My guess is that there is a whole Mrs Marcos closet full of "other shoes"
Palin stepped on a ton of people on the way up. The way down is gonna be a bumpy ride/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andy823 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #16
28. I agree.
Who really knows how much more of these kind of things will come up in the future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PSzymeczek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #16
62. The upstairs neighbor is a millipede. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hamsterjill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
19. I hope it's a big boot!!!
I hope they actually have something and it's not just a headline. But then again, I still say she resigned for some specific reason, and not for the vague reasons that she gave.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Twinguard Donating Member (486 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
6. I'm shocked!
Shocked, I tell you, shocked! A reichpublican (allegedly) bypassing those pesky rules and laws for personal gain??

SHOCKED!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
8. How can she occur personal debts if the state has a budget for this stuff?
Edited on Tue Jul-21-09 03:50 PM by xultar
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #8
24. Why would having a state budget for something mean that she cannot pay herself, if she chooses?
Edited on Tue Jul-21-09 04:46 PM by No Elephants
If state law says she can't have her own lawyer and/or she can't use any funds for her defense other than the state funds, then she broke the law. But that's not the charge.

And if paying for it herself would be fine, I don't see the problem with letting people help her out, if they choose.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bette Noir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #24
43. Campaign finance laws. Anti corruption laws.
Public officials, members of the government, aren't supposed to ask people for money for random purposes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #24
47. Hard to believe you don't understand graft and bribery.
Stop making yourself look stupid, if you can.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Steerpike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 07:31 AM
Response to Reply #8
81. The state does not cover her legal fees.
No matter if they are found to be unfounded or frivolous, if she wants to have legal counsel, she has to pay. There are some legislators right now suggesting that we change that to avoid future problems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TygrBright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
9. Well, strike me purple and call me Wilberforce! Who EVER would-a thunk it?!? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sutz12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
10. "Again" or "still" Just askin'
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
plcdude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
12. Well
that sounds like a good reason to resign from your governorship doesn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
13. So she violated ethics law by asking for money to fight ethics violations?
So the more unethical she is, the more money she gets?

Damn ! that girl is creative, in a crooked sorta way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
luvspeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
14. It's just the Gotcha Personnel Board playin politics agin...
oh where is Tina Fey when you really need her?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bleacher Creature Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
15. OMG. Did the sun also rise in the east this morining????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PainPerdu Donating Member (93 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #15
72. Phoenix Rising
That was Palin,rising from the asses this A.M.

I could see her from my front yard!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
17. I'm stunned. Just stunned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
18. This is Latest and Breaking, but it is hardly News
What is the nature of a corrupt grifter?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
20. I can see jail from my front yard
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Steerpike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 07:51 AM
Response to Reply #20
83. Good Day!
Even if she were to be found guilty the maximum punishement would be a fine. And, then she would have a finding that would allow her to set a new fund legally. Although I believe once her resignation is final she can set up a fund that is outside the jurisdiction of Alaska State law.

Also, I've been referring to the Personnel Board as the Ethics Board. But, I hope you all know what I mean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
21. But she said that the money for the lawyers was coming from the taxpayers ...
.... of Alaska and that is why she was going to step down because she didn't want their money to
be spent?





I still think her getting her lake house built for free as they were building the Wasilla hockey
rink is gonna come up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #21
27. Charging her with violations and investigating costs money; and the
taxpayers of Alaska pay for that, no matter who pays for Sarah to defend herself.


Not that I believe she gave a rat's tail how much it was costing Alaska to investigate. She sure didn't care when she asked for one of the investigations during her campaign because she thought it would clear her name. (It didn't, but she still claims it did.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Steerpike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 07:45 AM
Response to Reply #21
82. The money
Edited on Wed Jul-22-09 08:22 AM by Steerpike
The Alaskan citizens saw state money used to cover the cost of the PersonnelBoard investigation and the FOA requests. The Taxpayer has not paid for her legal defense or her personal lawyer's fees.

As for her house being built with city funds and resources. Ha, that's not beyond the realm of possibility. But, it is unlikely. I remember Sarah when she was first elected Mayor of Wasilla. The Sheriff thought he would become the de facto Mayor (he viewed her as an inexperianced little girl who could be easily manipulated). He had a good part of the population behind him too! After some very public and vocal head butting, Sarah fired the Sheriff (much to his shock and disbelief). And since that day, she has accrued a whole army of political enemies. If she had done anything illegal or unethical, her enemies would have dug it up and used it against her in a heartbeat. The FBI recently stated that they have no investigations and have to reason to believe that there will be any investigations on the Palins now or in the near future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
25. It's Jesus Plus Nothing for this broad. SHE obviously makes the rules, not the legislature. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
26. Can't wait to see how this all plays out. Is jail in Palins future?
Couldn't happen to a nastier person.

:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crowman1979 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #26
60. Jailin Palin?
Great now I'm thinkin of her in a lesbo porn, thanks a freakin lot! LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PainPerdu Donating Member (93 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #60
74.  Jailin' n' Nailin' Palin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #26
71. When she announced her resignation, the speculation was that there were mulitple
legal problems looming. Two? more?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow2u3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
29. No wonder Palin is resigning
I know something was fishy with her. She didn't want the door opened to her closet; that was where she kept her skeleton stash.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joey Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
30. She's the gift that keeps on giving:)................. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatrynXX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
31. Fairly sure she quit because of something big
of course her spin machine says all these are frivolous and that she's never been guilty of any of them. Which is false. Think she forgets troopergate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #31
35. I think that there is more and this is just the tip of the iceberg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PainPerdu Donating Member (93 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #35
73. Get that mojo workin',girl..
Hope she's got that witchdoctor pastor on speed dial!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Steerpike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 08:04 AM
Response to Reply #31
84. Spin is as spin does.
Edited on Wed Jul-22-09 08:13 AM by Steerpike
The Personnel Board has found in her favor in all the charges examined so far. Of course, ultimately none of these are jailable offenses. And most are pretty petty on their face.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
32. What a trainwreck that bitch is.
You heard me. Bitch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
36. Palin implicated in ethics probe
*Yawn* Again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingofalldems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
38. Didn't she basically call Obama a terrorist while
the crowd shouted, "Kill him!"? I seem to remember that. And she has a pal here who wants Democrats to socialize with her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Steerpike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 08:47 AM
Response to Reply #38
85. well
I don't advocate voting for her. I didn't...nor do I care if you socialize with her....I don't...but a certain amount of facts and civility would be nice. Hoping she gets homosexually raped in prison is just one of the many statements made in this thread that I find uncalled for.
I know she did some crazy ass shit during the last campaign and sure we should all call her on that. I just feel compelled to show her a little fairness, which I would do for anyone regardless of their race, creed, religion, sexual orientation or national origin.

well...now that I've alienated everyone here....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Steerpike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #85
86. hmmmmmm....
Kind of quiet in here...

hey do you know the difference between God and Sarah Palin?

God, doesn't think he's Sarah Palin...

One of my concerns about sarah leaving is the resurgance of the Corporatists. No one knows exactly what is coming and that is kind of unnerving.
As far as the state goes, we are going back to square one. The new Governor will be Sean Parnell, a former oil lobbyist, is a party line Republican. I can see the days of Frank Murkowski making a big comeback. Randy Ruidrich (The Head corporatist...the leader or the Republican Party of Alaska and chief clone of big oil in the state) and Parnell are probobly in a backroom right now smoking cigars and plotting Big Oils reclamation of Alaska. We are pretty much fucked. Unless you are a corporatist, in which case you are probobly dancing on your tiptoes and singing "happy days are here again" interspersed with a chorus of "We're in the Money!" .
As to Sarah Palin; I assume she will take her show nationwide and make a tubload of money in speaking fees and of course after this month she can legally profit from her book to the tune of a couple of million. She will reposition herself as the new Ralph Reed. Eventually becoming a leader of the religious right, her strengths will be magnified exponentially. Although the religious right only encompasses a few million you will find that they love Sarah. She's like a cross of the Virgin Mary and Joan of Arc. Their "passion" for her will be limitless.
I think her enemies will find that their big mistake was that they did not kill her (metaphorically). Couse now she is only going to get stronger. And she'll be rich too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
39. A Republican scandal that doesn't involve sex?
Palin may have her Republican membership revoked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Optical.Catalyst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
40. Palin is dirty, Palin is guilty, let's watch the Republican blow up doll go to jail
Good riddance to evil.

Not just evil, but stupid evil.

I hope she rots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bette Noir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
41. I knew it. When she announced her resignation,
I figured there was a 10% chance that she was pregnant, and a 90%chance that there was an ethics problem that would stick.

Even a small-county sheriff (Orange County, California) knows that you have to quit your official position before you can accept money or donated services to defend against an ethics charge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Corey_Baker08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
45. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yavin4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
46. It's Unethical Because She'd Be Indebted To Those Private Interests
Some shady organization(s) could pay her fees, and then they'd have influence over her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
49. No great surprise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabatha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
50. Here is the complaint in PDF
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
51. What's that smiley I'm looking for.... OH YEAH
:nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
52. This is referred to as the other shoe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SalmonChantedEvening Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
53. No, no, no, no, NO!
It's another attack by her enemies! Whoever they may be. And by attacking her, they are showing themselves to be lesser Alaskans and Americans, dontcha know?

:sarcasm: just for cma purposes k. ;)

For the record, I'm just glad it wasn't health related. Not a wisher of that on anyone.

That being said, Grill Sarah Grill! :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllyCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
54. You don't say? Wow, well that is out of left-field. Oh wait, you mean Palin?
shock over. Illegality was predicted by more than one person in her stepping down as Guv, but this seems small potatoes compared to what govs usually do. Wonder what else is coming...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissDeeds Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
55. She's a Republican
That's an ethical violation in my book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidpdx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
56. Hey Sarah, there's still time to file a complain against yourself
get a favorable ruling and then say you had nothing to do with it. LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
57. Many Repubs probably won't see any problem with this -- business as usual..
But this will be the last straw for most. If she wasn't finished before, she is now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
waiting for hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
59. Wait! Do I hear something?


Clunk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
61. I think the breach of ethics is because of the way the fund was set up...
rather than there was a fund at all. It still isn't that clear but this sentence from the article:

"An investigator for the state Personnel Board says in his July 14 report that there is probable cause to believe Palin used or attempted to use her official position for personal gain because she authorized the creation of the trust as the "official" legal defense fund."

The word "official" being in quotes is what is leading me to believe it is the how that is the problem not the existence of the fund itself.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
63. LOL!
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dappleganger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
64. Repost!
Oh, wait.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudToBeBlueInRhody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
65. *YAWN*
Edited on Tue Jul-21-09 07:40 PM by ProudToBeBlueInRhody
How many of these fucking stories have their been? She's like Reagan, teflon. Call me when something sticks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
66. This is why she stepped down
I have a hunch she is in bigger trouble than this...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
68. She has ethics?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sellitman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
90. Stop picking on this poor Good Christian Woman.
Just kidding..

Have at it. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC