Source:
Bloomberg.comPlantations of engineered trees would give International Paper a competitive advantage by providing a reliable supply of lower cost wood at a time when timberlands are dwindling because of development, said David Liebetreu, the Memphis, Tennessee- based company’s vice president of global sourcing. Opponents are concerned that alien genes may contaminate natural forests, echoing objections to modified crops that Monsanto still faces.
“There is a potential to explode once they get these trees approved,” said David Knott, who manages $1.3 billion as chief executive officer of Dorset Management in Syosett, New York. He said he increased his stake in Rubicon to 70.5 million shares this year to bet on ArborGen because it has a customer base of large landowners and little competition. “This could take off faster than Monsanto.”
Monsanto’s genetics, which were first sold in herbicide- tolerant soybeans in 1996 and insect-resistant corn the following year, were used in 88 percent of the world’s 309 million acres of biotech plantings last year. Monsanto’s sales of seeds and genetics quadrupled since 2002 to $6.4 billion last year.
Increasing Risk
Engineered eucalyptus trees could be an ecological disaster, bringing increased fire risk and extraordinary water consumption to a new environment, said Neil J. Carman, an Austin, Texas-based member of the Sierra Club’s genetic engineering committee. Easier-to-pulp trees will be weak, and hurricanes will spread their pollen and contaminate native forests, he said.
“These are Frankenforests,” Carman said. “You are tampering with Mother Nature in a big way by putting genetically engineered trees out there.”
The group won a court order in 2007 requiring Monsanto to pull modified alfalfa plants from the market while the USDA reviewed their environmental impact more thoroughly, and Carman said a similar strategy may be used against modified trees.
ArborGen says that genes won’t spread because its trees grow on plantations, not in forests, and are engineered to be infertile with impaired pollen production.
Read more:
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&sid=aEHNB_XJRWGU
GMO Forests already exist in a big way, and what is not spoken of is the allergic reactions to pollen from these forests, that dump tons into the atmosphere virtually all at the same time.
http://www.ecoworld.com/nature/genetic-engineering-look-before-you-leap.html.First the settlers cleared their land by burning it, then selling the resultant ash to for that manufacture of Potash for farm crops. Then when the forests dwindled, the farmers turned to Potash for mineral sources, while the settlers now wondered why their land was depleted after shipping off centuries of stored nutirents in the form of ash for a quick buck.
The following 9 year old report will provide some background on how widespread this issue is. Pay attention folks, our natural BioDiversity is at stake. The Doomsday clock is ticking.