Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

White House: Fox News Is 'A Wing Of The Republican Party'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 11:53 AM
Original message
White House: Fox News Is 'A Wing Of The Republican Party'
Edited on Sun Oct-11-09 11:57 AM by kpete
Source: Talking Points Memo

White House: Fox News Is 'A Wing Of The Republican Party'
Ben Frumin | October 11, 2009, 12:22PM

White House Communications Director Anita Dunn slammed Fox News in an interview on CNN with Howie Kurtz this morning, saying that Fox News "is more a wing of the Republican Party" than an objective news organization.

"The reality of it is that Fox News often operates almost as either the research arm or the communications arm of the Republican Party," Dunn said.

But this morning, Dunn seems to have taken the White House's criticism of Fox News to the next level. For instance, she said that when President Obama talks to Fox News, he approaches it differently than other cable networks.

*** When he goes on Fox, he understands he's not going on it really as a news network at this point, he's going on to debate the opposition.



Read more: http://tpmlivewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/10/white-house-fox-news-is-a-wing-of-the-republican-party.php?ref=fpa



Fox News is wing of the Republican Party
VIDEO:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WWoc3PQiweQ&feature=player_embedded
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. Bravo, Ms. Dunn!
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Farzan Donating Member (87 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
76. She was right on
Fox's somebody said "an increasing number of people get their news from Fox". I am not sure about "increasing" but I sure know it is not the "news" they are getting. And those who choose Fox, lets consider them lost beyond reproach and move on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wednesdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 06:29 AM
Response to Reply #76
138. I think you mean "beyond help"
They'll never be beyond reproach.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
86. "Brava" actually.
If you'll allow me a moment of smartassery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 06:38 AM
Response to Reply #86
140. I actually did know that. But I find it rude to do something in
Edited on Mon Oct-12-09 06:40 AM by Kahuna
cyberspace that you would probably not due in person. I mean really? Do you go around correcting people in real life? I doubt that. That would be douche-baggery of the highest order. Take care.

P.S. For the record, you could do a search of kahuna + brava, and verify that I actually do know the proper usage. Sometimes you just want to see who has nothing better to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 07:06 AM
Response to Reply #140
142. Naw. I believe you.
And I would do it in person with a joking smart ass look on my face.

You took that smart assery a little too hard!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zanne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #142
151. As someone who also graduated from The School of Smartassery....
Smartassery doesn't often translate the same way in written form. I'm sure you didn't mean to be rude, and I'm guilty of having done the same thing myself in the past, but us smartasses have to be careful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MindandSoul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
104. Finally, someone who tells the truth about Fox News!

Ms. Dunn is absolutely right! And it was time this was said loud and clear.
Between her and Grayson. . .there is some hope for the Democrats yet!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kablooie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #104
120. And someone officially from the WHITE HOUSE! YEAH!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
165. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Stargleamer Donating Member (636 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
2. It's sad that we have to praise them for stating the obvious
but such is life in the U.S.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
3. Wow, spines and sharply honed tongues are breaking out all over.
And it's about time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mosaic Donating Member (851 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
57. All they needed was some demonstrated leadership
And Alan Grayson provided it. I see the beginning of a new trend of progressive strength.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
4. Well said. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
5. The White House should throw Fox News out of the James S. Brady Press Briefing Room...
...and have nothing to do with them for the next 7+ years.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monmouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Absolutely correct on that thought...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Hope Mobile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #7
18. I hope they do. Maybe that will start forcing the "MSM" to start being a little more honest. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no limit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 09:01 AM
Response to Reply #18
148. So the way to make the MSM more honest is threaten to cut off their access if you dont like them?
That worked really well during the Bush years, didn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zanne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #148
152. That worked VERY well during the Bush years.
It worked for the Republican Party for a long time during that period, if you remember.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no limit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #152
163. Right, and instead of fixing the system lets continue to abuse it
Edited on Mon Oct-12-09 11:24 AM by no limit
Because the dems happen to be in power (dems that do plenty of wrong). That is until the next republican is elected and then people like you will be bitching about how the white house controls the media.

Maybe I'm naive for thinking this broken system can actually be fixed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wielding Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
40. Fox makes no attempt to be accurate with the truth. That should
Edited on Sun Oct-11-09 02:20 PM by The Wielding Truth
disqualify them as members of the Press. Propaganda and out and out lies are not the qualities of a professional News network that is trusted with mass communications.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #40
48. Actually if they would just admit that they are a right-wing network that serves the GOP...
...I would be less concerned with them being in the Press Room.

There are conservative and liberal news outlets that are there and upfront about who they are and who they represent.

Fox News should be shunned until they admit their mission.


...and then shunned for their lies.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #48
61. Where is a "liberal" news outlet?
I don't know of any that get access to the white house.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #61
64. I think that The Nation and Huffington Post have White House Press Credentials
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #64
89. Right...
.... but no TV.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demconservative Donating Member (4 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #61
99. Several
MSNBC, CNN, and most of the time the major networks (ABC, NBC, CBS) - although they jump right for variety sometimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tishaLA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #99
109. LOL. Yeah, Scarborough is super liberal. And so is Dobbs.
NONE of those networks is 'liberal'--the major networks are centrist/corporatist. They only look left when you're peering at them from the vantage point of neoconservatives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #99
115. Riiiight - a couple hours in the evening M-F on ONE network is the equivalent of 24/7/365...
You can take your repuke BULLSHIT and shove it up your repuke ass...

THERE IS NO "EQUIVALENCY"!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 04:24 AM
Response to Reply #115
129. Whammo...LOL
Was that a Heat round or an Anti-DipShit round!(pizza time)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #129
147. Too bad, I was hoping to have some fun with that one before they pulled his plug.
Oh well there's plenty more where he came from.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zanne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #147
153. Yes, and they're messy.
I'm tired of having to scrape exploded Repuke heads off my doorstep these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #147
164. Who finishes his or her job, faster than anyone in the history
of work?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
Any mind-reader who reads any republican's minute moran mind. A VERY short read indeed!(.000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001 Nanosecond or less)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #164
172. Yes, it's always a short read. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 03:51 AM
Response to Reply #99
126. With the exception of four
hours on MSNBC the ones you listed are either a little right of center or very right of center. CNN is nearly as blatantly right wing as Fox.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 06:02 AM
Response to Reply #99
135. NBC and all of it's networks are owned by GE . . . so . . . no.
Edited on Mon Oct-12-09 06:03 AM by HughBeaumont
ABC is owned by that commie liberal company Disney and broadcast the Clinton hit piece The Path to 9/11. So . . . yeah, no.

CBS is owned by Viacom, which is run by conservatives. Sooooooooooooooooo . . . no.

CNN cheerleads military occupations for ratings and can best be described as right-leaning centrist, AT BEST. So . . . . no again.

There is NO liberal media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tutankhamun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #99
170. Go back to Freerepublic with your idiotic tripe about "lib'rul media."
The media that rolled over and bent over to get Cheney/Bush installed and propagandize their wars and misdeeds is really liberal.

You need to update your talking points.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #99
174. You're....
... a first-degree moron if you think any of them are liberal. Moron.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dotymed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 04:31 AM
Response to Reply #40
130. TWT,that used to be the "law."
Sadly, since Reagan had the FAIRNESS DOCTRINE rescinded, the
Fla. supreme court has decided that "News organizations
do NOT have the responsibility to be honest." Of course.
that was a case that involved Fox "news", when some
of its employees sued them (FOX) for purposely wanting them to
distort the facts(lie). President Obama appoints the FCC
members. All he has to do is appoint a chair person who
believes that the FAIRNESS DOCTRINE should be reinstated.
Then, MSM propaganda will stop. President Obama, at one time,
said that he would not reinstate the FAIRNESS DOCTRINE. Maybe,
he has changed his mind. I really hope so. I sincerely believe
that it is responsible for the "dumbing down" of
America. The media used to be required, by law,to announce
when they were giving personal opinions instead of raw facts.
They had to give free air time to individuals with opposing
views. This insured that our country had one of the best
informed citizenry on earth. Since the reagan decision, the
truth was effectively sold to the highest bidder.."I
believe that the content of NEWS programs should be determined
by the free market"..that is why we have so many ill
informed people.I believe our education levels will rise along
with the consciousness of our citizens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #130
146. And today's political polarization was a direct result.
It wasn't the only factor but the degradation of our political climate can be traced back to this policy change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #40
168. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hvn_nbr_2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #5
51. I'd prefer that they keep one Faux shill in the room and...
make him sit between two cardboard cutouts of Jeff Gannon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Golden Raisin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
62. Not just the White House.
Democrats (Governors, Senators, Representatives, Mayors, etc.) should not appear on Fox, period. All they do is lend it credence and "respectability" which it has neither earned nor deserves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GMA Donating Member (467 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #62
85. Or...
they could show that they're grown-ups, put the message out there, regardless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MindandSoul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #62
105. Boycott Faux News!
You got a point! maybe a serious boycott by all the Democrats would make it clear that they only offer Extreme Right Wing Spin!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #5
175. Couldn't agree more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drm604 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
6. Yes!
Tell the truth. Call it what it is. :applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr. Sparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
8. Talk about the worst kept secret in American Poultices.
I bet the regular cracker-jack media are all in a state of shock, now that one of their sources for news has been labeled a partisan, propaganda outfit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Piewhacket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. Shocked! Shocked to discover chickenshit at Fox.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
9. I love it!!!
That ought to explode heads over at Ruperts pet project.
The whine will be deafening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Piewhacket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
10. Well duh! I figured that out in 2002.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clintonista2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
11. OWNED!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
samsingh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
12. truer words were never spoken
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlbertCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
14. No doubt Fox will protest vociferously...
....and it will be a joke like everything else on air there.

We will enjoy their distress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #14
38. The louder they squeal
the better I like it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
go west young man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #14
53. Actually I bet they do just the opposite.
They will ignore this news as they do other news that doesn't fit their agenda. I checked out their website a minute ago and they have no mention of it. They propagandize, they lie, and they obfuscate the truth. They'll prpbably spend the afternoon discussing a waterskiing squirrel instead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkeye-X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #53
108. NOT TWIGGY! ANYTHING BUT TWIGGY!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donquijoterocket Donating Member (357 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #14
63. victims
What they'll do is immediately go into the attacked messenger victimization mode, standard wingnut tactic when called out.
About the only thing more boilerplate is the liberal biased media dodge which is nothing more than a portable escape hatch. There will of course be the usual number of their already brain-damaged true believers rise to their defense mindlessly mouthing the talking points pox noise and the RNC have put there, but all in all I expect that most Americans will be pleased to see the White House standing up for what it believes in. Personally I can only handle pox noise in doses of 5 minutes or less, but their reaction ought to be mildly entertaining.I might even have to check in once in a while.Maybe Glennda the Beckerhead will squeeze out a few real tears over this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BABarackus Donating Member (14 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
15. Fox News: bringing you a small narrow minded part of the story.
Maybe there should be some standards set for calling it a news organization, along with new names for those who don't make the cut.
eg...
News: (full coverage of actual occurrences and occasional well defined editorializing)ABC, NBC, NYT, CNN etc...

Seminews: (some coverage of events with opinion and editorializing masquerading as fact)Fox News, MSNBC, Drudge report, etc...

News Parody: (making fun of the news and making stuff up)Daily Show, The Onion, etc...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WatchWhatISay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #15
23. Bullshit. You can't dump MSNBC in with Fox and Drudge
there is certainly more editorializing on MSNBC than CNN and the networks, but that does not mean they are on par with Fox/Drudge
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catshrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. MSNBC usually says when it's editorializing
Faux news just spews its crap as if it is news with no differentiation. They're so used to lying and spreading the RNC talking points that I doubt anyone over there knows the difference. Maybe Shep. I like Shep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalmike27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #23
80. Completely right
While FAUX basically often tells complete lies, MSNBC, though maybe tending to be a little more to the center, today's and the corporate media's left, at least strives to put forward honest reporting.

FAUX, on the other hand, actually has won a lawsuit about its coverage of bovine growth hormone, in a Florida local station, by using the truth that "news is in no way, required by any law, to have factual coverage."

Man, that's as close to tragic as anything, but it's true. Isn't it just the damndest thing that news doesn't have to be honest, or true? They can, and do, just lie, and lie, and lie with no penalties. But show a little nipple, and you're in deep do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stellar Donating Member (251 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 08:01 AM
Response to Reply #80
143. Fox did win the right to misinform their viewers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cid_B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 04:03 AM
Response to Reply #23
127. Frankly it is naive to assume any source is unbiased...
Wasn't it NBC who put sparkers in their GM trucks when they crashed them in order to insure an explosion?

Seriously, everyone needs to take it all with a grain of salt and move on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #15
30. MSNBC hosts use FACTS and have ethics
Something Fox "news" makes no pretense to.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #15
31. Faux News has a history of spewing outright lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #15
39. What a joke.
MSNBC actually has facts to back up assertions. Faux and Drudge make things up whole cloth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #15
65. FOX will change the Republic's party affiliation from an 'R' to a 'D'
when reporting a Republic in trouble with the law or a sex tryst.

Why would they do that on a consistent basis?

I know the answer, do you?

MSNBC, CNN, NBC, ABC, CBS, etc doesn't do that, ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zanne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #15
154. The last time I went to CNN for news...
All I got was snarky reporters who were editorializing every piece of news they presented. I think it's been so long that we've seen real journalism that we don't know what it is anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
16. We needa more Anita!!!!!! Ms. Dunn dunn good!
Edited on Sun Oct-11-09 12:51 PM by valerief
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fearless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
17. YES!!!
:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
horseshoecrab Donating Member (613 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
19. Brava!!!
Well Done! Truer words were never spoken!

:patriot:


horseshoecrab
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Can of Whoop-ass Donating Member (176 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
20. Tee Hee
Edited on Sun Oct-11-09 01:09 PM by Can of Whoop-ass
I figured that out in 1996 with their obsession with Clinton's Monica-gate.

FOX's stock market analysts would bring up Monica-gate; their high school reporters and fashion editors would bring it up.

"What will Bill be wearing to the Camp David meetings... by the way.....".

Their interns and cameramen would talk about bj's while collecting their bribes from the GOP.

Their caffetia workers, lawn jockies and shoe-shine boys would say, "Good morning Mr. Sean Insannity, how about President 'Stiffy' Clinton"?

Ann Coulter stated that Clinton was a pervert and made up stories about cigars and blue dresses.

And on and on and on..........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
givemebackmycountry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. Welcome to DU Whoop-ass!
If I remember (and I do) FOX News was created just to cover the Clinton administration, and they were deplorable back then and they still are today.

Just once I would like to see one of the token liberals they bring on to mock and ridicule, reach across the desk and smack the shit out of Bill-O or that smarmy piece of shit Hannity.
Just knock them on their ass, and sit back and laugh and say "Fair and Balanced Mother-Fucker!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WatchWhatISay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #20
26. "made up stories about cigars and blue dresses"?
no need to mix facts and fantasy as if we cannot distinguish the two
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #20
58. Anyone with that name should be shouted and sung to: WELCOME TO DU!!!!!!!
:hi:

That's one of my favorite phrases!!!

:rolf: :patriot: :yourock: :headbang: :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleGirl Donating Member (377 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #20
67. Whoop-ass
Love your handle. wish I had thought of it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
21. The President said he was going to call the liars out
I have been wanting this propaganda machine exposed for so long.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YouTakeTheSkyway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
22. This is a Smart Move, Puts FOX on the Defensive
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
27. When is Rupert going to start whining? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
28. Stating the obvious
Now it's time to deal with them in the regulatory process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thickasabrick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
29. K&R ...Finally!!! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beartracks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
32. Poor, put-upon Fox.
Now the talking heads will beat their drums and their chests and complain about unfair treatment, about how out of touch the White House is, and that this kind of attitude from liberals only proves that Fox is in fact the last great bastion of objective journalism, blah blah blah. They take this kind of stuff as a badge of honor, and they'll be raising the alarm about the "fairness doctrine."

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graywarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
33. How many years has it taken to say this ? At least 8 ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Plucketeer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
34. NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!! Fox dishonest???
It's too bad the Three Stooges are dead. They'd be perfect as an hour-long feature on Fox! :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
35. One more reason to love this White House. It's a superb team
of thinkers and communicators.

They're not constrained by the "realities" made by the previous regime of thugs and liars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnWxy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
36. advertizers should be considered contributors to a GOP PAC.

Recommmended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
37. Can we have a +10 multple for recs on this thread?
It's obvious but it needs to be repeated over and over and over again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnotherMother4Peace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #37
41. A K&R from me - it's about time this was said out loud by the WH - everyone knows it
It should be called the republican talking points network
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
42. +1 for stating the obvious.
Now, what are they going to do about it? Fairness Doctrine anyone? And/Or Stricter Ownership Rules?

I won't hold my breath.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
43. I was talking about this with my brother & s-i-l this morning how FOX is a propaganda network.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YewNork Donating Member (449 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
44. Fair and Balanced
Towards the Republican Party, that is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ut oh Donating Member (190 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
45. At least
they're starting to call Faux News for what it is...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
46. Well I guess the meeting with scumfuck Roger Alies didn't go well
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creeksneakers2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #46
52. !!!
Edited on Sun Oct-11-09 03:10 PM by creeksneakers2
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #52
54. I'm not kidding I guess the meeting was for shit.....
http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/2009/10/it-has-begun-axelrod-meets-with-roger.html


At a time of tension between their organizations, White House senior adviser David Axelrod met with Fox News chairman and chief executive officer Roger Ailes two weeks ago, sources tell POLITICO.

The two met privately in Manhattan during the president’s visit to the United Nations.

The two discussed news coverage and the relationship between the organizations.

An FNC spokesperson tells POLITICO that Ailes and Axelrod had a “cordial conversation” over coffee while the president was in town.

Ailes is the founder of Fox News. A key part of Axelrod’s portfolio is the president’s image and broad message.

White House officials have expressed pique with what they consider heavy coverage of Obama critics by opinion shows on the news channel.

Obama aides showed their displeasure by omitting “Fox News Sunday” when the president granted interviews last month to the other Sunday shows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #54
73. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Submariner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
47. Okay becKKK, it's time to break out that 55 gallon drum of Vicks Vapo-Rub
you got yourself some cryin' to do this week....sissy boy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DutchLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
49. CNN isn't much of a 'news' network, either...
None of them are, really. (Including MSNBC.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phasma ex machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #49
95. +1 mass media corporate brainwashers just hazing plebe faux in bizarre "news" initiation ritual. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 08:13 AM
Response to Reply #49
145. None of the Corporate outlets are. They are about entertainment, not news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Love Bug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
50. News from the "No shit, Sherlock" office of the White House
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
55. PS if this thread doesn't get 100 recs, I'll shit a brick
it deserves a thousand and made my day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
56. Actually, I think that all of the news networks are just in it for the best possible ratings and...
profits. It's not just Fox News. Fox is using a right wing agenda to milk their ratings. MSNBC is trying the opposite approach. But I believe that if Fox thought that a move to the left would increase their ratings, they would move left in a heartbeat. And for that matter, some of Fox's personnel such as Beck and Hannity are even to the right of the Republican Party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #56
101. Yep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AsahinaKimi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
59. That is awesome .. TELL it like it fricken is..
This is just awesome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MetaTrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
60. As Obama gains in popularity, will Fox put an (R) next to his name?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quasimodem Donating Member (259 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
66. Of course, Faux Noose is part of the GOP, but not a wing.
I've always thought of it as being more like the "pope's nose."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MindandSoul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #66
106. Not a "wing"
It's more like the tail that wags the dog!!! I'm not sure what what is left of the Republican party would do without Fox News to give them their "spin" on news!
Oh, wait. . .they would still have their supreme leader: Rush Limbaugh!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingofalldems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
68. Kurtz will not let this go--expect his next column to be a defense of Fox
I had an email exchange with him years ago--he claimed Fox to be completely unbiased.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #68
83. There's a reason why he won Media Whore of the Year in the early 00's
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #68
116. He's already having a cow - this morning's show was hilarious to see him whine and squirm...
and beat the "equivalency" drum - over and over and over...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
69. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Kingofalldems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #69
74. Oh look another 'Democrat party' spouting fan of pigboy Limbaugh
Obama won the Nobel Prize---dwell on that for a while.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #74
75. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
thelordofhell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #69
77. Why don't you tell us what the republic version is?
Edited on Sun Oct-11-09 04:53 PM by thelordofhell
Since you only seem to only get Democratic right when you post "sarcastically". Enjoy your pizza.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoDesuKa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #69
79. Democratic Forum
You might have guessed from the website name that this is a forum for Democrats. Democrats are contentious people, a fact which you also might have observed over time. That said, there are vaguely defined core beliefs that define us as Democrats, as opposed to CPUSA members. If you're not one of us, then, you're here as a guest. That imposes an obligation on you to be at least well-mannered.

You're not a Democrat, and you acknowledge that. I can't guess from just one post whether you behave yourself rhetorically or not. Because right wingers generally don't have any manners, they quickly make themselves unwelcome in discussions in which politeness is important. This forum is one of those places. There's no unusual standard of behavior imposed on you that isn't imposed on any other guest.

If you want examples of rude behavior, watch the clips of Hannity or O'Reilly using low-level verbal assaults, interrupting their guests, raising their voices, and being generally obnoxious. Right wingers have come to think of that as debating opposing viewpoints - which it certainly is not. If you have been bounced from Democratic Underground in the past, it's likely that you will be bounced again. Learn to behave yourself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
left of center Donating Member (287 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
70. FOX News is so over-the-top about it, how could anyone...
... come to any other conclusion!! Other news organizations have their bias, even liberal bias, but FOX News spins everything negatively about everything and everyone they don't like, which is apparently a lot these days!

They are a joke, and someone should take them to court over their "fair and balanced" claim.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeglow3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
71. Already being spun
My in-laws were discussing this today and said it is proof that all other media is in the tank because the White House admitted no other outlets challenge them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
72. Fox cable news has high ratings...
In all of cable, Fox News finished the quarter as the second-most-watched network in primetime, behind only USA Network. CNN ranked 17th, MSNBC placed 24th and HLN, CNN’s sister news channel, came in 30th. For the total programming day, Fox News was 5th, CNN was 14th and MSNBC was 28th.

Fox News also dominated the list of top news analysis programs, claiming nine of the top 10 spots. “The O’Reilly Factor” finished first, averaging 3.4 million viewers and posting a 27% gain over last year. “O’Reilly” also wrapped up the month of March with its 100th consecutive month in the No. 1 spot. Following “O’Reilly” in the top five were “Hannity” (2.7 million), “Glenn Beck” (2.2 million), “Special Report With Bret Baier” (2 million) and “The Fox Report With Shepard Smith” (1.9 million). MSNBC broke into the top 10 with “Countdown With Keith Olbermann,” which averaged 1.4 million viewers for the quarter.
http://www.tvweek.com/news/2009/03/cnn_ratings_down_fox_msnbc_gro.php


I'm not sure that any of the major news networks is all that influential on how voters decide when they go to the polls. Most Americans rarely watch cable news, but instead watch reality shows and other babble.

There is no doubt that Fox is far from "far and balanced". I doubt that anything the Obama administration says will change that. Fox News may even glory in it and proudly proclaim it on their commercials.

The irritating part is that MSNBC is not in HD on Direct TV. That doesn't help their ratings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #72
78. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #72
92. MSNBC is not available on Comcast cable
unless you pay extra for digital. Faux is included in the bare minimum service.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MindandSoul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #92
107. Discrimination!
If this is true, it is outright discrimination! No wonder Fox is so proud of telling everyone that they have so many more viewers!
I do get MSNBC, but i never noticed that I was actually paying extra for it!
I think it should be paying extra for both or for neither!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #107
113. In this area Comcast moved MSNBC over to digital
over a year ago. Fox comes with standard cable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #92
112. That is really screwed up. (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
81. No shit ma'am.
n.t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Livinson Donating Member (1 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 05:39 AM
Response to Reply #81
133. know new information here
http://www.google.com>click here to know more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 07:05 AM
Response to Reply #133
141. Uh what?
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FREEDOM61 Donating Member (14 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
82. Stand Up and Fight
About time! I have been looking for them to stand up to the Republican. They act like they scare to stand up for the people who got them elected. :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alp227 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
84. YES...Fox IS a tool of the GOP!
Edited on Sun Oct-11-09 05:39 PM by alp227
Of course! Why? The obvious: Rupert Murdoch hired Republican political consultant Roger Ailes as FNC's first CEO.

Then in 2001, Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR) released its study "The Most Biased Name in News" that disproved FNC's deceptive slogan "Fair and Balanced".

Also FAIR found in 1996:

In the 1995-96 election cycle, over $3.2 million was donated to national political organizations by the five TV news networks, their corporate parents, subsidiaries or top officers. The five heavyweights are Disney (ABC), Time Warner (CNN), News Corp/Rupert Murdoch (Fox), General Electric (NBC) and Westinghouse (CBS).

The national soft money was split evenly between Democrats and Republicans, although Rupert Murdoch tipped the balance rightward with an additional $1 million pre-election gift to the California GOP.
(emphasis mine)

So not only a tool but also a reliable donor.

Reiterating my point about donations: here's some sites where you can look up Fox News campaign contributions

http://www.opensecrets.org/indivs/search.php?capcode=mfphf&name=&employ=Fox+News&cand=&state=&zip=&all=Y&old=N&c2008=N&c2006=N&c2010=N&sort=N&page=&page=1

http://fundrace.huffingtonpost.com/ (search terms: Fox News, Fox News Channel, FNC)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GMA Donating Member (467 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
87. Ahhh...
another happy day at du...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gauguin57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
88. Sky is blue. Grass is green. The Pope is Catholic. Film at 11.
This should have been said a long time ago by the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenTea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
90. Anyone who hasn't known this fact for at least 10 years is either in complete denial or
Edited on Sun Oct-11-09 06:28 PM by GreenTea
consummate idiots - As most in the media and the democratic party are....

Fox masquerades as a legitimate news organization ONLY to manipulate the news & their bullshit polls solely to benefit the republican party ideology.

The slimy fucking republicans know this & use (Fox news) as a tool, to their advantage by pretending it's a real news organization yet in reality it's ALL bullshit putting out slanted lies and omitted news stories along with their unbelievable bullshit polls that are so obviously full of shit it's amazing the rest of media and the democratic party even pays attention to them...

Yet the media & Dems do even though the only reason Fox news chief neocon republican Roger Alias functions are day to day, are to benefit his own republican party and to trash all democrats, as well as democratic ideology, policy, philosophy and agenda....

Fox news, like the republican party & the pigman Limbaugh solitary reason to exists is to increase the profits & power of the corporations over the people...That's it. Nothing more (or less)!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Claire Beth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
91. she's right on! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
93. It is about time that we started yelling about that naked emperor!!!
FAUX NOISE, that is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MessiahRp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
94. By admitting this, now you have to wonder how Fox isn't legally breaking some sort of campaign laws
I mean if this is an entire network that is working on behalf of a party then this is a legal breach of campaign finance laws, no?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rozlee Donating Member (821 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
96. Hmm, still nothing on Fux News about Ms. Dunn's comments as of now
Think they'll have anything tommorrow? Or are they afraid their viewers will collectively say, "But, Fox News IS a wing of the Republican Party. That's WHY we watch it." Worse, they might be afraid a viewer might start selling T-shirts with that logo. They're backed into a corner. They can't debate their way out of this one. I'd like to see them take on a few liberals in a debate about their Republican slant. It would be impossible for them to win. They'd make asses of themselves. Their bias is so out there, that my theory is that they'll just ignore Dunn's comments altogether. Any bettin' folks out there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #96
117. I'm sure they'll have on LIEberman to get the DemocRAT viewpoint...
being "fair and balanced" and all...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoccoR5955 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
97. Git 'er Dunn!!
Edited on Sun Oct-11-09 07:57 PM by RoccoR5955
What have we here? Another Dem growing a spine?
Maybe more will follow. We can only hope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
98. She said whaaat?
Bravo!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
100. Anita Dunn is outstanding! but I read she's leaving to spend more time with her 13 y.o. son...
I completely understand that, believe me.

However, who has the WH got to replace her? This is of vital interest. The Obama team has got to continue to play this for keeps and play to win, because the RW will always be out for blood.

Hekate

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
102. I love that the Democratic Party seems to be getting a little more in-your-face.


:thumbsup::thumbsup::thumbsup::thumbsup::thumbsup:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KyleA Donating Member (134 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
103. You think?
Tell us something we don't know
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BumRushDaShow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
110. K&R
for calling them out! :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
111. SAY IT, SISTER
AND KEEP ON SAYING IT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
114. About fucking time!!!
And THEY have to talk about it - THAT'S the GREAT thing about this - and EVERYONE will know about it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
devilgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 11:42 PM
Response to Original message
118. Couldn't the same thing be said about CNN?
They're just as much of a mouthpiece for the GOP as FAUX.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
go west young man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-11-09 11:48 PM
Response to Original message
119. I'm pretty sure this will be on the Daily Show come Monday.
And I bet John Stewart is gonna say "What took you so long?!!!!!!!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unicron1978 Donating Member (5 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 12:28 AM
Response to Original message
121. YOU KNOW WHY THE FOX NEWS PROPAGANDA CHANNEL HAS HIGH RATINGS?
It’s because the fucking morons that watch it don’t know how to operate a computer. That’s it. That’s the reason Fake News has such high ratings. It’s because the inbred retarded fucksticks that watch that propaganda channel couldn’t find the ON switch of a computer if their pork rinds depended on it. Furthermore, I don’t know anyone with more then two brains cells that actually watches TV news when you can get unlimited information from multiple sources off the interwebs.

So the next time some right wing scumbag starts crowing about Fake News’ ratings just tell them what I have told you. They are too fucking dumb to use a computer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Harry Monroe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 01:22 AM
Response to Original message
122. This is like saying the sky is blue
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moonbatmax Donating Member (290 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 02:17 AM
Response to Original message
123. GEE, why don't you just come right out and SAY it???
And, seriously, if they're the RESEARCH arm of the Republican party? :spray:

I think we just found out what's wrong with the Republican party! :dunce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 02:17 AM
Response to Original message
124. Ought to change the name from Fox News to Fox Lies....
Truth in advertising.

mark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 03:23 AM
Response to Original message
125. Fox is indeed the Ministry of Propaganda for the anti-Americans who cluster
under the disgraced banner of Republiconism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 04:20 AM
Response to Original message
128. it's a small step, but significant that a Democratic leader can acknowledge some part of reality
instead of reading the script the republicans wrote for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BluDemocratGirl Donating Member (262 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 04:56 AM
Response to Original message
131. Wake 'em up, Ms. Dunn!
Fauze Noize, in which I would say, is the right "chicken" wing of the GOP! They hate us liberals with a passion, and I don't give 2 flying f**ks about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 05:03 AM
Response to Original message
132. This just in...
"FOX is full of sh!t!"(but it's fair und unbalanced nihilism)

Funny but dangerous, when you think about the amount of input FOX had in the case of the Bush gang making their case in the run-up to the invasion of Iraq.(the selling of a war that shouldn't have been) FOX was really handy to Bush, Cheney and Rummy, in so many ways.

FOX is a neocon party organ instead of a "News Network" and IMHO, they are every bit as dangerous to this country as those radical right wing NAZI publications were to Germany, before and during WW II. The identity(definition)of the targets("Untermenschen")has changed, but the message of hatred and bigotry is the same. The longer FOX gets away with preaching hatred and planting their evil seeds in the minds of the gullible the more deadly and toxic their venom will become.

Maybe we need to at least revisit the fairness doctrine. Maybe we need some congressional hearings with some witnesses under oath. FOX may be abusing their right to "Freedom Of Speech." It brings to mind the shouting of fire in the crowded theater. Maybe it's time for FOX to be "put in it's place?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 05:41 AM
Response to Original message
134. File this under No Shit, Sherlock!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 06:17 AM
Response to Original message
136. About time.
FOX has no more objectivity or credibility than Jeff Gannon and Talon News.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ejbr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 06:28 AM
Response to Original message
137. The "butt this morning..." before the continued post
concerned me. I am so used to Dems folding that I no longer expecter STRONGER statements after a "but". BRAVA!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 06:34 AM
Response to Original message
139. OBAMA WINS ELECTION IN A LANDSLIDE! WATER IS WET!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 08:10 AM
Response to Original message
144. The Bush White House admitted this
the quote was something like, "We watch Fox News to make sure our side is being presented"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
disndat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
149. One reason the Faux Noose
is the no. 1 channel is because when traveling and stopping at various motels, Faux Noose is the only channel you can watch for free besides the Weather Channel or else you have to pay for mostly, "adult" channels. I should think that the F.C.C. should go after this monopolistic situation as an anti-trust violation. On the other hand, if you combine all the other less totally RW channels, statistically they must outweigh Faux Noose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zanne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
150. THANK YOU! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
155. Welp, how many years did that take?
Fuck'n A! I'm gett'n old here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
irislake Donating Member (967 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
156. And the rest of the MSM
does not mainly represent corporate interests?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tonekat Donating Member (832 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
157. Does this mean the gloves are off? I hope so! N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmarsh Donating Member (27 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
158. What I dont understand is WHY Fox is allowed to call themselves a News Network

Thats what I dont understand. Everybody knows that FOX is simply the GOP mouthpiece, that is little in debate anymore. And thats fine they are entitled to spew their garbage as much as they like. There are two things I dont understand:

1. Why are they allowed to call themselves a NEWS organization. They are entitled to their opinion, but opinion isnt news. And to be fair, Neither is Keith Olbermann. But that why its called "Countdown with KO" instead of the "KO News Program".

2. Why they are allowed to publish facts and information that they know to be false. TV shows can make occasional mistakes, but deliberate misrepresentations are a totally different matter. I refer to the fact of labelling unpopular people who are Republicans as Democrats as an example. Once could be excused as a mistake, but repeatively is simply propaganda. Lying on TV is not allowed, saw why does FOX get a pass?

I dont understand why the FCC doesnt clamp down on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
varebel Donating Member (2 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
159. he approaches it differently than other cable networks??????
Why? Because he can't handle criticism
Maybe unlike Chris Mathews (who gets a tingle up his leg from Obama) and Msnbc, and 98% of all the other media outlets isn't a "wing" of the Democratic Liberal Left?:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
"Anyone" who disagrees with the White House is a "wing" of something other than the current Administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blossomstar Donating Member (772 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #159
160. What planet are you from?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #159
176. Siiiiiiiiiiiiiiiigh . . .
Stick around. Learn something. Your precious FAUX is a fraud of the highest order, filled with charlatans disguised as journalists, opinion posing as fact, and facts that suit corporate dominance. It's not a real news network. It's a Reaganite/Bushian Supply-side circus. It's a sham and anyone who believes in what that channel tells them is about as big a dumbass as they deserve to be called.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
161. About time --
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
162. and has been so for over 10 years. Only a fool could deny that!
Edited on Mon Oct-12-09 11:12 AM by ecstatic
In fact, when I first discovered Fox News, I wasn't into politics at all and quickly realized that I disagreed with EVERYTHING they said. And these days, they are completely unwatchable--not even for the purpose of getting a few laughs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomCanyon Donating Member (11 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
166. Fox once said WMD had been found in Iraq
Here's the link: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2006/06/22/report-hundreds-wmds-iraq/

That's only part of the proof that they work for the Republican Party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
167. Are they sure? I thought that the Republican Party was now a wing of Faux News.
After all, isn't Rush who calls the shots for the GOP?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mvd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
169. Absolutely correct
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
171. The only people clueless enough not to know that are Fox News watchers. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
steven johnson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
173. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
177. Isn't this common knowledge by now? Glad they said it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #177
178. For at least 6 years.
I had my cable disconnected 6 years ago and told the cable company that Fox News was just "a propaganda outlet for the Republican Party."

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC