Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gardner sentenced to two life terms

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
IScreamSundays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 06:04 PM
Original message
Gardner sentenced to two life terms
Source: North County Times

ohn Albert Gardner III, a convicted sex offender who was previously imprisoned for sexually assaulting a 13-year-old neighbor, was sentenced Friday to two consecutive life terms without the possibility of parole for raping and murdering North County teenagers Amber Dubois and Chelsea King.

The sentencing came after the parents of the slain girls and another woman he assaulted addressed Gardner, 31, directly in court, prompting him to cry at times and, in one instance, to show a dramatic flash of anger.

That moment came when the woman he assaulted on Dec. 27, 2009, Candice Moncayo, ended her emotional statement by saying, "How is your nose?"

That was a reference to her fending off the attack by hitting Gardner in the nose.
snip>

Read more: http://www.nctimes.com/news/local/sdcounty/article_969bfdc0-5fa6-11df-9125-001cc4c002e0.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bluzmann57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good.
The animal got what he deserved. Too bad that young lady didn't rip his face off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. Atleast the family didn't have to suffer through a long trial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sharesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. The father of Chelsea King told Gardner he hoped his life in prison "will be hell on earth."
Emotionally understandable.

But that sentiment probably reflects the view of a majority of Americans.

So, what actual justice do Americans want or believe in?

Is it really so outrageous to suggest that a useful length of rope and a sturdy overhanging pipe or beam should immediately be made available to the convicted man?

Or do we prefer in good conscience that he be tortured at the hands of his fellow inmates?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. A great many Americans (and DUers) strongly advocate capital punishment
And, in the case of accused sex criminals, the sentence is frequently demanded before the case even goes to trial.


You present a false dichotomy, of course, though an innocent one: kill him now or allow him to be tortured.

A third possibility is that we incarcerate him for the rest of his life so that he is prevented from harming anyone else. In addition, if he suffers from some psychological illness, he should be treated for that illness during his incarceration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Put me down for the latter
After a few years of it, then give him the rope and the overhanging pipe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sharesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Ha ha. Torture first. Ok, copy that. Interesting to take a bearing on conscience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Well, it's actually my second choice
My first choice would have been to give a weapon to the mother of one of his victims before she went in to interview him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sharesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Torture as justice doesn't sound like a policy position to be very proud of though.
Edited on Fri May-14-10 06:31 PM by sharesunited
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Yeah, well I get over my guilt about it
Edited on Fri May-14-10 06:41 PM by customerserviceguy
by thinking of what his victims went through. Maybe you ought to try it some time, it's called empathy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #14
23. That's not empathy--it's vengeance, plain and simple.
You attempt to justify--indeed, to sanctify--one murder by appealing to the victims of another.

That's not how a civilized society should function.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cosmicone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
18. I am against capital punishment and torture both ...
... there is a third option, viz. amygdalotomy -- removal of amygdaloid bodies from the brain with surgery. This takes away all libido and aggression, allowing pedophiles/rapists/violent criminals to return safely back to society without cost to taxpayers.

It is unlikely to become a standard punishment ever .... but it the option is out there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sharesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. For someone who has committed at least two murders, I don't see this as an option.
Within the bounds of the permissible, how does institutionally assisted suicide sound? Better or worse than torture at the hands of his fellow inmates? Because you know that his personal security has a zero priority with the correctional system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brickbat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
5. I kinda wish Amber's mom wouldn't wait on the information she gained:
Edited on Fri May-14-10 06:28 PM by Brickbat
McGonigle then did what for many was unthinkable: on Wednesday, she sat down with her daughter's killer to get answers.

McGonigle said the 30-minute encounter at a downtown San Diego jail brought her the answers she needed.

She is not yet willing to share what he told her, other than to say Gardner said he had targeted Amber at random.

McGonigle said she does plan to share the answer to a vital question for parents: how he got Amber into the car as she walked on a very busy street in the light of day.


I'd like to know that sooner rather than later.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. She let herself be used
At some point, he's going to use that interview as an excuse for a release before he's died in prison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proteus_lives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
7. Monster.
He got what he deserved.

But I have to wonder, what's the point of keeping pedophiles alive? They can't be treated or cured, they hurt and kill children and I don't see any reason why any of them should be drawing air.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. For the bleeding hearts. He didn't get what he deserved IMO. However he did get taken off the
Edited on Fri May-14-10 06:33 PM by superconnected
streets which may or may not be permanent as we've seen from that Seattle cop killer who's life sentence was pardoned and from other people who did terrible acts like the Manson gal who people here supported being let out of prison when she asked to be released because she has cancer.

This case is only special because they were children. People kill people all the time - violently and get out in 6 years. I don't fully believe he will spend the rest of his life in the pen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #9
25. For the would be torturers
No pound of flesh is ever enough to satiate... you could burn him t the stake, and many people still wouldn't be satisfied.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elias49 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #9
26. Oh, I think he will. Or end up dead in the shower.
The sentence was "...without possibility of parole" wasn't it?
I honestly doubt that we'll ever hear of him again, once he's locked up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Once you identify an undesirable group as justifiably "killable," then you justify all killing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. If you're into blanket statements. By your reasoning killing your enemy in war or for any reason,
including they are trying to kill you, justifies all killing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. An immediate or credible threat is different from a retaliatory killing
Once the murderer is imprisoned and rendered harmless, then there is no justification for killing him.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. It's not merely an "undesirable group", like someone's ethnicity
it's a group that is identified solely on the basis of the willful behavior of the members of that group. Your comment is like saying "If we favor prison for one group of people, then we favor putting everybody in prison."

Just not buying it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. Okay...
Then all you need to do is declare a certain class of criminal "irredeemable" or "too sick" or "too dangerous," and then you give yourself carte blanche to do whatever you like to them.

You can argue about the problem of possible parole or danger to other prisoners, but that's a separate issue. The underlying question is: does the state have the right to kill a person who has been rendered harmless (i.e., imprisoned for life).

Just not buying it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tansy_Gold Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. The BF and I had this discussion over dinner last night.
He remains a supporter of "occasional" executions; I am staunchly opposed.

For one thing, a mistaken execution never gets a do-over.

The most heinous criminals can be kept off the streets, and if they are indeed rehabilitated in prison, they can serve their fellow prisoners but remain off the streets. There is as much good they can do there as anywhere, and perhaps more.

But the other thing to come out of our discussion was an examination of exactly what is a "crime." Even that is not so black and white (pun intended), because what is "murder" to one is "justifiable homicide" to another.


Killing the killer will not bring back the victim. Allowing the killer to live retains some opportunity for redemption.


Revenge should never be part of the picture.



Tansy Gold
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benld74 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
17. Life - Guarded life OR Life with the Prison Population??
If the later I give him less than 1 year after it is found out what he did
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unabelladonna Donating Member (483 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
24. let's hope he pisses off the wrong person
in prison. i don't understand how anyone isn't for the death penalty in cases like this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
27. Torture is always barbaric, but termination does not have to be so
I deplore the former, but support the latter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iandhr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-15-10 03:15 AM
Response to Original message
28. Put him
in general population.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC