Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Citizenship-By-Birth Faces Challenges

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Ed Barrow Donating Member (585 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 05:06 PM
Original message
Citizenship-By-Birth Faces Challenges
Source: NPR

In what might be the next great flash point in the nation's ongoing debate about immigration policy, legislation has been introduced in Congress and a pair of states to deny birth certificates to babies born of illegal-immigrant parents.

"Currently, if you have a child born to two alien parents, that person is believed to be a U.S. citizen," says Randy Terrill, a Republican state representative in Oklahoma who is working on an anti-birthright bill. "When taken to its logical extreme, that would produce the absurd result that children of invading armies would be considered citizens of the U.S."

Bills to challenge the fact that citizenship is granted as a birthright in this country have been perennial nonstarters in Congress, although the current legislation has 91 co-sponsors. As with other issues surrounding immigration, however, some state legislatures still might act, if only in hopes of bringing this issue before the Supreme Court.

"That was the primary purpose of the bill, for someone to sue us in federal court, and let's resolve this issue once and for all," says Texas state Rep. Leo Berman, a Republican who has introduced a bill to deny birth certificates to the newborn children of illegal immigrants. "I believe we are giving away 350,000 citizens a year to children born to illegal aliens."

Read more: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=127093634
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. They will need an ammendment for that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. No it doesn't.
It faces Teabagging rhetoric.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. Wouldn't that be against the Constitution?
Edited on Tue May-25-10 05:09 PM by hobbit709
Namely the 14th Amendment
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Croquist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Yes it is
Amendment XIV - Citizenship Rights

1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gmpierce Donating Member (72 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #9
40. It ain't necessarily so...
The Rights and Privileges clause of the 14th Amendment was trashed by the Supreme Court in 1873. (The Slaughterhouse Cases).

At least a dozen times a year I see it quoted by people who actually believe that the Constitution and its amendments actually mean what the words say.

Once you turn the lawyers loose, nothing means what it says.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. The 14th Amendment is enemy #1 for many far right wingers
This is just an effort to chip away at it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #13
55. You betcha
The due process clause being used to make the Bill of Rights apply to the states - limiting states' rights more, and the Equal Protection Clause - that clause must kill them - they don't want everyone to be equal before the law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
38. I think there's a competition to see who can push the unconstitutionallest laws lately. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. Hey, since they say that fetuses are people, doesn't that mean that any baby conceived
in the good ol' US of A is automagically an American citizen?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
5. I don't believe they will succeed. nt
Edited on Tue May-25-10 05:15 PM by BootinUp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
6. Children of invading armies -- like the children of the Founders?
LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Confederates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
8. "i believe we are giving away 350,000 citizens......."
where does one give away citizens?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #8
27. I guess they prefer that these children be auctioned? /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lance_Boyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #8
48. At the Northern border, if you're Mexico. n/t

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BadgerKid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
10. Wonder what they think of foreign students giving birth while on their visas. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. You mean like Michelle Malkin's parents?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BadgerKid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 07:48 PM
Original message
Not particularly; I didn't know.
I just happened to know from my conversations with Chinese-born students that having a baby is a definite goal. It's my understanding they view US citizenship with prestige in and of itself, but they are well aware of future opportunities for bettering the lives of their relatives by essentially buying their passageway into this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
41. They are here legally and can have as many kids as they want!
It is not "buying" their way in. They are legally here and if they have kids while here, those kids are native born citizens.

and they would still have to leave when their visas are up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BadgerKid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 07:30 AM
Response to Reply #41
45. Yes, that's fine by me.
"Buying" refers to the fees associated with bringing your family members here after you have gotten your green card.

I think everyone is simply wanting what they think is a better life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #14
35. And Bobby Jindal's, too.....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #10
23. They are concentrating on the children of undocumented parents.
A child conceived by someone who is here on a bona fide student visa would have no problem.

But in general, I wouldn't worry about this so much except that it shows to what ends some people are willing to go. Never in a million years would a constitutional amendment on this issue ever pass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #10
28. Bobby Jindall for one /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
golfguru Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 12:27 AM
Response to Reply #28
43. Jindal's parents were here legally
I think they are after kids born to illegals only.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #43
53. DU lesson 443 - threaded comments

My response was to:

"Wonder what they think of foreign students giving birth while on their visas"



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Downwinder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
11. If my great great grandmother was not a US citizen, are they going to deport
me to Scotland.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
golfguru Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #11
44. If she came here legally, then you have zero problem n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #44
50. The point is fourth generation illegal immigrants
and why should children not be citizens when it's their parents that did the legal violation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeglow3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #50
54. I agree. However, when the parents are shipped off, don't say you are breaking up families
It is the PARENTS who made the decision to break up the family and not the government. They are strongly encourage to take their child back with them. However, if the choose to abandon there child here, that was their decision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
12. Don't these people have anything BETTER to do with their time?
Maybe, just maybe, if they discovered monogamous sex, that would cure their obsession with all the sex that other people are having.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. The teabaggers still have to discover sex altogether before they can move on to the monogamous kind
I heard some of them are still waiting for the stork to deliver their families...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. Du-du-dupe
Edited on Tue May-25-10 06:05 PM by liberation
Damn chrome POS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gormy Cuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
17. Racist xenophobes, unite!
:banghead:

That quote about giving away citizens? If the idiot actually said that, let's check his papers because it's clear that English isn't his first language.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Veteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
18. In other news: Right wingers to gather and discuss possible acceptance of fire and agriculture
Vapors and Astrology have been tabled as too futuristic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Wasn't fire invented by foreigners, though?
That'll be an interesting floor debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Veteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #20
30. And agriculture leads to society which sounds an awful lot like "socialism"!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #20
37. Yeah. "Prometheus?" Sounds French! (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TransitJohn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
19. "Believed to be"?????
What a fucking dipshit. The Constitution says they are. End of story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
X_Digger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
21. What.. the.. frack?!?
Amendment XIV

Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.

It takes a heck of a contorted reading of that text to *ahem* attempt to deny citizenship of someone born in the US.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DGG Donating Member (18 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. They try to misrepresent the "jurisdiction" clause
It's useful to know that when the 14th Amendment is pointed out to these bozos, they claim that illegal immigrants don't count because it applies only to those "subject to the jurisdiction" of the U.S., and frequently quote something written by one of the principal authors of the Amendment that they claim supports that reading. In fact, the very statement they quote makes it clear that the "subject to the jurisdiction" rule is meant to exclude only persons holding diplomatic immunity. That is, if foreign diplomats have children in the U.S., those children are not citizens under the 14th Amendment. What's amusing about the crank reinterpretation that the exception also applies to illegal immigrants is that they're saying illegal immigrants are not "subject to the jurisdiction" of the U.S. and hence in effect have diplomatic immunity!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
X_Digger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #26
32. Talk about unintended consequences! LOL!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demigoddess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
22. next thing you know they will want to give citizenship only by income level
Once upon a time, only land owners could vote. They already want to take the vote away from women and black men. how much more of the constitution are they going to wipe out???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
one_voice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Good Lord...
don't give them any ideas. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unvanguard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
25. So they openly support the establishment of a caste system.
Nice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
29. Republicans attacking 14th Amendment. We fought a Civil War to get that one, you racist fugs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Omar4Dems Donating Member (95 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #29
52. So, we've come full circle
The amendment was crafted by...Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
31. What court could possibly find such legislation constitutional?
Oh wait...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
33. "the absurd result that children of invading armies would be... citizens of the U.S." Excuse me?
Children of invading armies? What planet were you born on, sir? When do armies have time to have babies? After they win the war, maybe? So then, what the fuck does United States mean? Taken to a logical extreme, sir, you are an idiot of the nth degree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. He had to get "invading" in there somehow. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
36. "...and let's resolve this issue once and for all"??? Excuse m? Seems to me Roe v Wade
was also settled in the courts, it's settle law. So why are we still monkeying around with it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
39. No, it doesn't
It's in the constitution.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 12:05 AM
Response to Original message
42. Thought RW already did this . . . and it's a sick idea --
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mbperrin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
46. You can't fix stupid.
Ron White is right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Veruca Salt Donating Member (846 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
47. So they want to change the US from jus soli to jus sanguinis
pretty much overturning one of the cornerstones of the US.

All right guys, everyone not of Native American descent will have to leave the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
49. Teh Stupid! It Burns!
I'm sorry I clicked on this thread. A plague on ALL your houses!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
51. The Randy Terrill quote just says aliens
I bet that's the way he feels about it, too. Probably even green card holders. The kids should just get green cards. I would not be surprised.

these people are idiots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Stranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
56. From now on, you have to be White to be a citizen. Even if you're born here.
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC