Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Judge blocks release of own medical history for appeal by former governor

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-04 04:09 PM
Original message
Judge blocks release of own medical history for appeal by former governor
Judge blocks release of own medical history for appeal by former governor

The Associated Press
3/28/04 3:40 PM


BATON ROUGE, La. (AP) -- A federal judge has blocked the release of depositions about his own medical condition for an appeal by former Gov. Edwin Edwards, who says the judge was impaired by medication during the trial that sent Edwards to prison.

In an appeal of the former Louisiana governor's federal extortion conviction, his lawyers have argued that U.S. District Judge Frank Polozola could have been impaired by painkillers he was taking for a back injury suffered in a traffic accident.

Lawyers for Edwards had sought to obtain depositions by the judge and his psychiatrist that were part of a lawsuit Polozola filed over the accident. Court records have shown Polozola was getting a prescription for the narcotic OxyContin during a period in 1999 when he was making pretrial decisions for Edwards' case.

Edwards' lawyers contend the state court depositions would help prove that Polozola was "erratic, even paranoid" when he presided over Edwards' trial.
(snip/...)


~~~~ link ~~~~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-04 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. "erratic, even paranoid"
The Limbaugh Syndrome?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mobuto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-04 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. Uh
While the judge sounds like he's almost certainly right, why the hell didn't he recuse himself and let another judge make the same decision?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DulceDecorum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-04 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. It is a
Scalia thing, you wouldn't understand it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-04 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. wow. a cross between limbaugh and scalia!
Edited on Sun Mar-28-04 06:42 PM by truthisfreedom
all we need now are some ducks and a cyst.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sanity Donating Member (111 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-04 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. This is a bullshit stalling tactic
Edwards is scum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 05:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC