Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

.Tarmac Delays Exceeding 3 Hours Decline After Threat of Fines

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
SpartanDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-10 02:37 PM
Original message
.Tarmac Delays Exceeding 3 Hours Decline After Threat of Fines
Source: Bloomberg

AMR Corp.’s Eagle unit was the only U.S. carrier to report tarmac delays exceeding federal limits in July, with three flights, Transportation Department data showed.

The number is down from 161 flights delayed more than three hours in July 2009, according to a statement today. Such delays have fallen 98 percent in the three months since a rule took effect imposing fines on carriers that exceed the target.

“This rulemaking seems to point to a significant drop in long tarmac delays,” Shane Downey, director of public policy for the National Business Travel Association, said in an interview. “It’s very good for the business traveler.”

U.S. airlines must offer passengers a chance to get off stuck planes or face fines as high as $27,500 per customer, under a rule by Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood that went into effect on April 29. Three-hour-plus delays have fallen to a total of seven for May, June and July from 463 in the same months a year ago, data shows.


Read more: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-09-13/tarmac-delays-exceeding-three-hours-in-u-s-decline-after-threat-of-fines.html



Wow down 98%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
activa8tr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-10 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. Surprised? Not me. But will our flights be as safe? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crim son Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-10 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. This is a massive drop in delays.
Has there been a similarly massive increase in accidents and other dangerous events? Or if not a massive increase, what increase, exactly? You have me wondering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-10 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I was thinking the same thing
What corners are being cut at crunch time to get these planes in the air?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-10 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Who says they're getting in the air?
They're not on the tarmac pushed away from the jetway but they might be staying at the jetway.

The places to look for consequences are those that would be affected by a shortage of berths for incoming flights: Planes stuck out on the tarmac after landing, flights delayed at their origins, flights left circling in the air waiting for a berth. You'll also find that this "back up" is unlikely to occur if there's excess capacity, say, during times when people aren't flying such as during recessions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-10 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. The rule doesn't include 'at the gate'?
I thought the clock started when the door shut. Can you clarify for me? I'm not in the industry and don't know the nuances of the regulations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MidwestTransplant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-10 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. Damn regulations. They never work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
awoke_in_2003 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-10 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. +1000. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brickbat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-10 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
8. But but but! BUT! I thought businesses regulate themselves and if they suck people will go
elsewhere! I don't believe it at all! Amazing!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC