Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

ALJ finds parts supplier unlawfully discharged 20 immigrant employees in Minnesota

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-11 04:08 PM
Original message
ALJ finds parts supplier unlawfully discharged 20 immigrant employees in Minnesota
Edited on Thu Jun-02-11 04:41 PM by Omaha Steve
Source: NLRB

June 02,

FULL title: ALJ finds parts supplier unlawfully discharged 20 immigrant employees in Minnesota after they refused to sign away NLRA and other rights

An NLRB administrative law judge has found that parts supplier Supply Technologies LLC unlawfully required employees to sign up for a comprehensive grievance and arbitration system that would eliminate their rights under the National Labor Relations Act, and then discharged 20 employees when they refused to do so.

Eighteen of the discharged employees were Hmong refugees and two were Spanish-speaking immigrants, all employed at the Ohio-based company’s Minneapolis warehouse. Four testified, some through translators, at the administrative law hearing that they did not fully understand the documents explaining the new system and were concerned that they were signing away rights. All four said they were escorted out of the building or told to leave immediately after refusing to sign the documents.

In his May 31 decision, Administrative Law Judge George Alemán wrote that three documents describing the program, given to employees at the Minnesota warehouse and three other facilities, were confusing and inconsistent, at one point making “patently clear that the only claims expressly exempted from the TSM procedure are those involving workers compensation claims, unemployment claims, and criminal claims,” and at another point assuring employees they could file other claims with government agencies, but would waive any rights to remedies that might result.

The company’s new system, called Total Solution Management, created an internal process that began with an investigation, went to mediation, and then on to a final arbitration if necessary. It was introduced three days after an NLRB-conducted election in which employees split 22-to-22 on the question of joining the International Brotherhood of Teamsters. In the event of a tie, the union does not prevail, and so the employees were not represented at the time of the discharges. Nevertheless, the union filed charges with the NLRB alleging that the new grievance policy and the firings constituted unfair labor practices.

Judge Alemán ordered Supply Technologies to discontinue its new grievance system at all four locations - in Minneapolis, Memphis, Des Plaines and Lenexa, Kansas, and to offer reinstatement to the 20 discharged employees, with full back pay. The company may appeal the decision to the Board in Washington.

* Printer-friendly version: http://www.nlrb.gov/print/500



Read more: http://www.nlrb.gov/news/alj-finds-parts-supplier-unlawfully-discharged-20-immigrant-employees-minnesota-after-they-refu



Copyright exempt.

Contact:
Office of Public Affairs
202-273-1991
publicinfo@nlrb.gov
www.nlrb.gov

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
John_Adams Donating Member (110 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-11 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. It is not clear whether they were also unlawfully hired...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drm604 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-11 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. There's nothing in the article to indicate that their hiring was unlawful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pampango Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-11 06:37 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. 18 of the 20 have refugee status, so at least 90% were hired legally. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turbineguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-11 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. The Union should try again
I think they might get voted in a 2nd try.

Where do managers go to school these days? Where to they learn this shit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-11 06:20 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. That is exactly what will happen if the company settles with the NLRB

I too believe they would win.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drm604 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-02-11 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
4. I'm not a lawyer but it seems to me that such agreements must be illegal.
If an employer can force employees to sign away their legal rights, then they don't really have those rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 08:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC