Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

First Drop in Number of Problem U.S. Banks Since 2006

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 11:08 AM
Original message
First Drop in Number of Problem U.S. Banks Since 2006
Source: NY Times

The number of banks on the government’s list of institutions most at risk for failure fell in the second quarter, the first drop since before the financial crisis began.

Twenty-three lenders came off the list of so-called problem banks during the second quarter, bringing the total to 865, according to data released Tuesday by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Not all of the troubled lenders will inevitably fail, but the F.D.I.C. considers them most at risk, making the quarterly update one of the clearest measures of the banking industry’s health.

It was the first decrease in the number of problem banks since the third quarter of 2006.

The report also contained other signs of improvement. There were 48 bank failures in the first half of 2011, far fewer than the 86 failures in the first six months of 2010. Last year’s total of 157 collapsed banks was the highest level since the last severe recession in the early 1990s.

Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/24/business/first-drop-in-number-of-problem-banks-since-2006.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Myrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well, duh ... if the 'troubled' ones have already closed ... the list gets shorter.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. exactly... it's been a Bank Bust Friday regularly for 3 years now
so that is bound to get shorter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cstanleytech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-23-11 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Exactly what I was thinking as it just makes sense that if there are fewer banks now
because most of the collapsed ones have been assimilated that there you would think be fewer banks being reported as being in trouble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 01:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC