Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Key group now backs Obama's Medicare quality plan

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
cbayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-11 01:25 PM
Original message
Key group now backs Obama's Medicare quality plan
Source: AP

By RICARDO ALONSO-ZALDIVAR, Associated Press – 2 hours ago

WASHINGTON (AP) — An influential medical group's change of heart is boosting President Barack Obama's plan to use Medicare to promote higher quality, less expensive care.

The American Medical Group Association represents premier organizations like the Mayo Clinic, the models for the proposed "accountable care organizations" in Obama's health care overhaul law. The networks of doctors and hospitals will collaborate to keep patients healthier.

Just a few months ago, the group said the administration's initial plan was too complex to work.

But in a letter to Medicare chief Don Berwick released Friday, the group said significant revisions changed the final blueprint for the better, and now it warrants serious consideration.

Read more: http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jFvvbvidxEXPC-43NIBgJYFB7jNg?docId=4d4d45ae532a4bfa83e18a50e0d9a329
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-11 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
SoapBox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-11 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. Interesting...but
I'm always apprehensive when some of the "powers that be" say, "...Medicare to promote higher quality,
LESS expensive care."

From my own experiences with my company health insurance, when EVER there is anything like that (as is coming to our plan, regarding some medications, in 2012), it is simply code for, the patient gets screwed.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cutlassmama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-11 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. that's the plan. Screw the elderly and disabled and keep more for the rich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thecrow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-11 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Do you have a link for that, cutlassmama?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CarmanK Donating Member (459 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-11 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I AM SUSPICIOUS!! When the GROUPS agree with Obama, it
means that OBAMA compromised away our health care choices. Obama may be a good negotiator for the world but he is lousy when it comes to the 99%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-11 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
5. The post deleted above was deleted in error. Our apologies - please
feel free to repost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pam4water Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-11 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
6. The best and probably only way to improve medical quality is to let people pick there own doctors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-11 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #6
15. Doctors are people. Our perverse fee for service model rewards overuse
It also rewards incompetence

Google hospital readmissions
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
russspeakeasy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-11 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
7. Follow the money..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-11 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
9. We have to bend the cost curve on Medicare
That being said the idea is to study what works, what doesn't and establish best practices.

Then to incentivize better care, because screwing up is currently incentivized

Hospital re-admissions make more money for hospitals & doctors, but cost tax payers millions

Reward the providers that excel at better treatment outcomes, because perverse fee for service incentivized overuse.

One example is colonoscopies after age 75

Others are drugs that don't work

We are the reality based community

Decisions should be made based on evidence

Not wishful thinking

Terri Schiavo was wishful thinking
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-11 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. "bend the cost curve" = BS double talk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-11 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Pretending we can spend unlimited amounts is wishful thinking
Edited on Sat Oct-29-11 10:36 AM by roseBudd
We should not be paying for things that don't work

Like Medicare Advantage

the $500 million over 10 years ACA supposedly "stole" from Medicare, was actually over payments to Medicare Advantage providers like Humana

I thought democrats were pragmatic

Not wishful thinkers like the people who cling to the idea that tax cuts don't reduce revenue
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-11 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. Taxes: heard of them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-11 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Yeah, we still can not continue the unsustainabls trajectory of healthcare spending as a percentage
of GDP

We can not afford to have the terminally ill spend their last weeks & months in intensive care units, rather than hospice
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-11 08:15 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. Yeah, we aren't going to see eye to eye. I'm all about Canada's model and what you're suggesting
sounds a lot more 3rd world than we've already become. No thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-11 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. "our main achievements consist of devising ways to marginally extend the lives of the very sick"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-11 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Exactly, and that is the goal of establishing accountable care organizations.
There are huge opportunities for savings by starting the move towards evidence based care. Medicare as it currently exists is disastrous.

If we wish for it to be our model for a single payor, universally available system, we must reform it.

"Hands off my medicare" is a losing proposition.

Great post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-11 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Read David Brook's article on mortality...
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/15/opinion/15brooks.html


"The fiscal crisis is driven largely by health care costs. We have the illusion that in spending so much on health care we are radically improving the quality of our lives. We have the illusion that through advances in medical research we are in the process of eradicating deadly diseases. We have the barely suppressed hope that someday all this spending and innovation will produce something close to immortality.

S. Jay Olshansky, one of the leading experts on aging, argues that life expectancy is now leveling off. “We have arrived at a moment,” Callahan and Nuland conclude, “where we are making little headway in defeating various kinds of diseases. Instead, our main achievements today consist of devising ways to marginally extend the lives of the very sick.”

that phrase, “marginally extend the lives of the very sick,” should ring in the ears. Many of our budget problems spring from our quest to do that.

The fiscal implications are all around. A large share of our health care spending is devoted to ill patients in the last phases of life. This sort of spending is growing fast. Americans spent $91 billion caring for Alzheimer’s patients in 2005. By 2015, according to Callahan and Nuland, the cost of Alzheimer’s will rise to $189 billion and by 2050 it is projected to rise to $1 trillion annually — double what Medicare costs right now."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loyalsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-11 02:55 AM
Response to Reply #13
19. The most tragic part
is that the extension comes at the cost of home health services that reduce the strain on families and provide quality personal care during the final years\months. In the end providing that care saves money and improves quality of life for all involved. The medical community and policy makers are anxious to apply technology yet are willing to deny the resulting medical expenses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burrowowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-11 02:25 AM
Response to Original message
18. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-11 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
21. bad medicine is the most expensive medicine.
fuck it up? get paid twice!
we need to change that, and not just for financial reasons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC