Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Puffing on Polonium By ROBERT N. PROCTOR NYTimes

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-02-06 09:48 AM
Original message
Puffing on Polonium By ROBERT N. PROCTOR NYTimes
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/01/opinion/01proctor.html?_r=5&oref=slogin&oref=slogin&oref=slogin&oref=slogin&oref=login



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

December 1, 2006
Op-Ed Contributor
Puffing on Polonium
By ROBERT N. PROCTOR
Stanford, Calif.

WHEN the former K.G.B. agent Alexander V. Litvinenko was found to have been poisoned by radioactive polonium 210 last week, there was one group that must have been particularly horrified: the tobacco industry.

The industry has been aware at least since the 1960s that cigarettes contain significant levels of polonium. Exactly how it gets into tobacco is not entirely understood, but uranium “daughter products” naturally present in soils seem to be selectively absorbed by the tobacco plant, where they decay into radioactive polonium. High-phosphate fertilizers may worsen the problem, since uranium tends to associate with phosphates. In 1975, Philip Morris scientists wondered whether the secret to tobacco growers’ longevity in the Caucasus might be that farmers there avoided phosphate fertilizers.

How much polonium is in tobacco? In 1968, the American Tobacco Company began a secret research effort to find out. Using precision analytic techniques, the researchers found that smokers inhale an average of about .04 picocuries of polonium 210 per cigarette. The company also found, no doubt to its dismay, that the filters being considered to help trap the isotope were not terribly effective. (Disclosure: I’ve served as a witness in litigation against the tobacco industry.)

A fraction of a trillionth of a curie (a unit of radiation named for polonium’s discoverers, Marie and Pierre Curie) may not sound like much, but remember that we’re talking about a powerful radionuclide disgorging alpha particles — the most dangerous kind when it comes to lung cancer — at a much higher rate even than the plutonium used in the bomb dropped on Nagasaki. Polonium 210 has a half life of about 138 days, making it thousands of times more radioactive than the nuclear fuels used in early atomic bombs.

We should also recall that people smoke a lot of cigarettes — about 5.7 trillion worldwide every year, enough to make a continuous chain from the earth to the sun and back, with enough left over for a few side-trips to Mars. If .04 picocuries of polonium are inhaled with every cigarette, about a quarter of a curie of one of the world’s most radioactive poisons is inhaled along with the tar, nicotine and cyanide of all the world’s cigarettes smoked each year. Pack-and-a-half smokers are dosed to the tune of about 300 chest X-rays....

Robert N. Proctor is a professor of the history of science at Stanford University.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-02-06 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
1. We needed another reason why smoking causes cancer?
Amazing.

:wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojorabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-02-06 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
2. I wonder why smoker's hair does not fall out
I read where polonium cannot be absorbed from the skin. Is there a barrier or semi barrier in the lungs to prevent major poisoning since so little is needed to kill when taken by mouth?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-02-06 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. But consider how little there is in a cigarette
0.04 picocuries inhaled per cigarette. The activity of polonium 210 is 4500 curies per gram, so that's 0.000009 picograms of polonium from one cigarette. The maximum safe body burden of polonium is 7 picograms, which would be absorbed from 787,500 cigarettes. That's 40 a day for 54 years - but, from the second link, "polonium is only slowly excreted – it has a biological half life of around a month" - so the polonium is gradually eliminated from the body. There will be a steady state where the intake from cigarettes balances the excretion, but it will be way below the 7 picogram level.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC