Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Pentagon’s Power to Arrest, Torture, and Execute Americans

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 09:22 PM
Original message
The Pentagon’s Power to Arrest, Torture, and Execute Americans
Posting Date
February 28, 2007

By JACON G. HORNBERGER

... Historically, the U.S. military has lacked the power to arrest, incarcerate, or inflict harm on American civilians. If Americans committed a federal crime, they were subject to being indicted by a federal grand jury and then prosecuted in U.S. District Court. The Bill of Rights guaranteed that the accused would be accorded certain rights of due process of law, such as the right to defend himself with the assistance of an attorney, to confront the witnesses whose testimony the prosecutors were relying on, to summon witnesses in his behalf, to remain silent, and to have a trial by jury. Everyone was presumed to be innocent and the government had to prove the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

Those constitutional protections and guarantees were upended on 9/11, without even the semblance of a constitutional amendment. On 9/11 the president and the Pentagon assumed to themselves the power to take any American into custody and inflict violence on him, without according him any of the protections provided by the Bill of Rights. Today, the Pentagon has the authority, on orders of its commander in chief, to send American soldiers into any neighborhood in the country and take into custody any American citizen and inflict harm on him simply by labeling him an “enemy combatant” in the “war on terror." ...

The CIA and the Pentagon assumed the authority to kidnap, capture, arrest, torture, “rendition,” and execute suspected terrorists all over the world. There were a few indictments, prosecutions, and convictions for terrorism in federal court, such as that of 9/11 conspirator Zacarias Moussaoui. But for the vast majority of foreigners U.S. officials picked up for terrorism, there was torture, indefinite incarceration, and in some cases extra-judicial executions. Sometimes the torture occurred at the hands of U.S. personnel. Other times, the torture was outsourced (“renditioned”) to police or intelligence forces of brutal, but friendly, foreign regimes ...

So it’s not surprising that they chose someone like Jose Padilla as their test case, rather than some middle-class high-school principal who was a member of Rotary. Federal officials knew that Americans would feel no sympathy for Padilla, especially after the U.S. attorney general went on television and announced that Padilla was planning to explode a nuclear bomb in the United States ...

http://www.swnewsherald.com/online_content/2007/02/022807ov_hor_pentagon.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
oldtimecanuk Donating Member (601 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. This is another very important issue that the Democrats better...
get to work on, and quickly.... Rolling back the Patriot act yesterday and any of the other crap laws that the Repubs pushed thru in the final days of the 109th Congress...

ww
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oldtimecanuk Donating Member (601 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. I vaguely recall that there were also some Democrats that were...
complicate in some of those votes as well! Why the hell would they not know the damage that they were doing to this country by going along? Just makes one shake their head in disgust.

ww
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oldtimecanuk Donating Member (601 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Sorry, I meant to say complicite...eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hestia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Wasn't the vote pushed through in like 4 days?
They weren't even allowed to read the bill? Am I remembering this correctly? This is when all the rhetoric about 'aiding and abetting the enemy if they didn't vote for it?' How many pages is it - 1200 or something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oldtimecanuk Donating Member (601 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Yes, and most of there bills were like that... How the hell do you..
scrutinize a 400 page bill (or larger) in order to make an honest decision on it.... But, if that were the case then the Dems should have walked out and refused to vote on it....

ww
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC