Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Critics Question Cheney's Need to Be Identified in Briefing as 'Senior Administration Official'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 04:52 AM
Original message
Critics Question Cheney's Need to Be Identified in Briefing as 'Senior Administration Official'
Edited on Thu Mar-01-07 04:56 AM by maddezmom
Cheney's Trip Renews Debate Over Attribution in News Accounts
Critics Question His Need to Be Identified in Briefing as 'Senior Administration Official'

By Howard Kurtz
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, March 1, 2007; Page A02

The reporters traveling with Vice President Cheney as he flew from Afghanistan to Oman yesterday were granted an interview with someone who would be identified only as a "senior administration official." But the official's identity would not remain a state secret for long.

~snip~

Administration officials concluded that, for diplomatic reasons, Cheney could not publicly discuss private conversations with Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf and Afghan President Hamid Karzai.

~snip~

At the start of our meeting with a senior administration official, in which he advised us that he insisted this talk be on background, we asked him, too, to go on the record," Silva said. Cheney agreed to be identified only while discussing the suicide bombing at Bagram air base in Afghanistan that occurred while he was there.

Silva credited the White House with releasing an accurate transcript despite numerous "I" references. "But it's also a measure of how absurd the entire business of speaking as an SAO is."

more:http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/28/AR2007022802021.html

Cheney's Rules for the Press
By Dan Froomkin

~snip~

Cheney's insistence on being identified as a "senior administration official" -- even when the transcript shows he spoke in the first person -- is in some ways laughably trivial.

But in other ways, the vice president's decision to extort reporters into a ridiculous agreement reflects the contempt Cheney has for the press corps.

Chicago Tribune reporter Mark Silva, for instance, filed a slew of informative, detailed and richly textured pool reports about the trip -- most of them reposted on the Tribune's Washington-bureau blog, The Swamp.

In one pool report last week, Silva slapped down as absurd rumors in the blogosphere that an earlier briefing he described as being from an administration official had actually been from Cheney himself. "I do not use that term when describing the vice president," Silva wrote.

more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/blog/2007/02/28/BL2007022801191.html


read it all...it's so freaking absurd


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 05:08 AM
Response to Original message
1. A senior DU source was reported to have snorted in amusement
until he remembered all the people who are dead because of one SAO's compulsively dishonest nature.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 07:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC