Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is U.S. Safer Since 9/11? Clinton and Rivals Spar / NYTimes

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-06-07 12:13 PM
Original message
Is U.S. Safer Since 9/11? Clinton and Rivals Spar / NYTimes
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/06/us/politics/06dems.html?ref=us

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

June 6, 2007
Is U.S. Safer Since 9/11? Clinton and Rivals Spar

By MICHAEL COOPER and PATRICK HEALY


The Bush administration’s efforts to thwart terrorism at home have created a fissure among the three leading Democratic presidential candidates, with Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton coming under attack for saying that America is safer now than before 9/11 — contrary to a popular line of argument among some Democratic officials.

In a televised debate on Sunday night, Mrs. Clinton, who has tried to minimize her differences with her rivals on commander-in-chief issues, bluntly disagreed with a main rival, former Senator John Edwards, who had just said that the administration’s so-called war on terror was little more than a slogan.

“I believe we are safer than we were,” Mrs. Clinton said. “We are not yet safe enough, and I have proposed over the last year a number of policies that I think we should be following.”

The senator, a New York Democrat, was referring to domestic security efforts since Sept. 11, 2001, and not to the consequences of the war in Iraq or President Bush’s foreign policy, her advisers say. Yet rival Democratic campaigns, arguing that the war in Iraq has harmed security in America by breeding terrorists, are using the remark to highlight differences with her on the issue of the ability to be commander in chief, which political analysts view as a threshold issue for any woman running for president.

I GUESS IT DEPENDS WHAT YOUR DEFINITION OF "SAFE" IS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-06-07 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hillary made an idiotic statement.
Now she pays for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-06-07 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. One of Many, Unfortunately
Triangulation does that to a person.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-06-07 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Agreed. I was not a big Hillary fan to begin with....
but that foolishly triangulated statement was a real disappointment. Stand for something, not everything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Parche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-06-07 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. 9/11
NO NO NO NO
We are never safe with a Bush in office...................
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-06-07 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
5. Hillary worshippers rushing to the defence in 5...4...3...2...1 nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-06-07 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
6. hillary rodham guliani..
i was in new york on 911 blahblahblah.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MasonJar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-06-07 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
7. Maybe, but we were not safe pre-9/11 because we had a cabal
of warmongering corporatists in the WH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 02:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC