Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Overcoming a Veto and Helping Children

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-28-07 11:56 PM
Original message
Overcoming a Veto and Helping Children
Unless President Bush backs away from his threat to veto a significant expansion of the State Children’s Health Insurance Program, it will be incumbent on all Republicans in the House who value health care over ideological warfare to summon the courage and vote to override him.

The Senate approved the legislation with enough votes to overcome a veto. It also passed the House with a hefty margin but fell 24 votes short of a veto-proof majority. Although it will be an uphill battle, it may still be possible to bring another two dozen House members to their senses.

Any Republicans courageous enough to defy the president on this issue will find themselves in good company. The measure, which would increase federal funding for the program by $35 billion over the next five years, is the product of intense bipartisan negotiations that included prominent Republicans in the Senate, led by Charles Grassley of Iowa and Orrin Hatch of Utah. It has been endorsed by governors from both parties and by a wide array of organizations, including the American Medical Association and the chief lobbying groups for private insurance plans and for senior citizens.

(snip)
Mr. Bush seems determined to use the children’s program to take a stand against what he calls “an incremental step toward the goal of government-run health care for every American.” He would rather sacrifice the health of uninsured children than yield an inch of ideological ground. House Republicans ought to take a more humane approach and override the president’s blinkered obstinacy.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/29/opinion/29sat2.html?ref=opinion
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC