Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

McCain’s Radical Agenda (Must Read)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
dtotire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-16-08 07:23 AM
Original message
McCain’s Radical Agenda (Must Read)
Edited on Tue Sep-16-08 07:27 AM by dtotire
McCain’s Radical Agenda


These are changes that will set in motion nothing less than the dismantling of the employer-based coverage that protects most American families.

A study coming out Tuesday from scholars at Columbia, Harvard, Purdue and Michigan projects that 20 million Americans who have employment-based health insurance would lose it under the McCain plan.
There is nothing secret about Senator McCain’s far-reaching proposals, but they haven’t gotten much attention because the chatter in this campaign has mostly been about nonsense — lipstick, celebrities and “Drill, baby, drill!”


For starters, the McCain health plan would treat employer-paid health benefits as income that employees would have to pay taxes on.
“It means your employer is going to have to make an estimate on how much the employer is paying for health insurance on your behalf, and you are going to have to pay taxes on that money,” said Sherry Glied, an economist who chairs the Department of Health Policy and Management at Columbia University’s Mailman School of Public Health.

Ms. Glied is one of the four scholars who have just completed an independent joint study of the plan. Their findings are being published on the Web site of the policy journal, Health Affairs.
According to the study: “The McCain plan will force millions of Americans into the weakest segment of the private insurance system — the nongroup market — where cost-sharing is high, covered services are limited and people will lose access to benefits they have now.”
The net effect of the plan, the study said, “almost certainly will be to increase family costs for medical care.”

Under the McCain plan (now the McCain-Palin plan) employees who continue to receive employer-paid health benefits would look at their pay stubs each week or each month and find that additional money had been withheld to cover the taxes on the value of their benefits.

While there might be less money in the paycheck, that would not be anything to worry about, according to Senator McCain. That’s because the government would be offering all taxpayers a refundable tax credit — $2,500 for a single worker and $5,000 per family — to be used “to help pay for your health care.”
You may think this is a good move or a bad one — but it’s a monumental change in the way health coverage would be provided to scores of millions of Americans. Why not more attention?

The whole idea of the McCain plan is to get families out of employer-paid health coverage and into the health insurance marketplace, where naked competition is supposed to take care of all ills. (We’re seeing in the Bear Stearns, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Lehman Brothers and Merrill Lynch fiascos just how well the unfettered marketplace has been working.)

Taxing employer-paid health benefits is the first step in this transition, the equivalent of injecting poison into the system. It’s the beginning of the end.
When younger, healthier workers start seeing additional taxes taken out of their paychecks, some (perhaps many) will opt out of the employer-based plans — either to buy cheaper insurance on their own or to go without coverage.

That will leave employers with a pool of older, less healthy workers to cover. That coverage will necessarily be more expensive, which will encourage more and more employers to give up on the idea of providing coverage at all.

The upshot is that many more Americans — millions more — will find themselves on their own in the bewildering and often treacherous health insurance marketplace. As Senator McCain has said: “I believe the key to real reform is to restore control over our health care system to the patients themselves.”
Yet another radical element of McCain’s plan is his proposal to undermine state health insurance regulations by allowing consumers to buy insurance from sellers anywhere in the country. So a requirement in one state that insurers cover, for example, vaccinations, or annual physicals, or breast examinations, would essentially be meaningless.

In a refrain we’ve heard many times in recent years, Mr. McCain said he is committed to ridding the market of these “needless and costly” insurance regulations.
This entire McCain health insurance transformation is right out of the right-wing Republicans’ ideological playbook: fewer regulations; let the market decide; and send unsophisticated consumers into the crucible alone.

You would think that with some of the most venerable houses on Wall Street crumbling like sand castles right before our eyes, we’d be a little wary about spreading this toxic formula even further into the health care system.
But we’re not even paying much attention.




http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/16/opinion/16herbert.html?ref=opinion
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jack Bone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-16-08 07:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. Is this sourced somewhere....or, did you write it?
Love it BTW, K&R!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Bone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-16-08 07:28 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. ahhhh..there it is..NYT's...thanx!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluethruandthru Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-16-08 07:36 AM
Response to Original message
3. Health insurance and Social Security are the issues we must
focus on!

The average American needs to know that McCain wants to privatize Social Security and tax your employer provided health insurance.

It needs to be repeated over and over and over....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nichomachus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-16-08 07:40 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Don't say "privatize"
It's just semantics, but "privacy" is a good thing to many people -- it would be better to say that "McCain wants to turn your Social Security money over to the Wall Street investment firms." That doesn't give people such a good feeling these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoFederales Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-16-08 07:54 AM
Response to Original message
5. Nothing particularly new here. Some public school employees have
faced this crap for years. School administrators set salaries on a pay scale allegedly for years of service and amount of schooling, yet when reporting "real" salaries, health insurance, etc, is added in as a per capita employee benefit for a new totally real salary. Lot of PR smoke and mirrors to make the districts look better (Oh, and admins take their cuts of the salary pie first, and what's left over goes to, uhm, whomever). McCain just twists the knife by increasing the tax burden. McCain can take his refundable writs and shove them up Republican assholes--I've had enough of their compassion.

NoFederales
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northsongs Donating Member (77 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-16-08 07:54 AM
Response to Original message
6. Missing a key point in my opinion...
One thing you rarely hear discussed in connection with health insurance coverage is that often, if you have a preexisting condition and can't get employer-related health insurance, you're ON YOUR OWN! I lost my job in June and am still looking, but I'll have to get a job that provides health insurance, because my wife has glaucoma and I had a heart attack in '07, so we essentially can't get coverage outside of a group plan. I literally mean that we were turned down, not just it would be too expensive, but totally not able to get it.

I don't think we're that big of an exception either. This will happen to others if employers move away from providing health insurance. And what about the employer having to match the tax on the health care deduction? Is that addressed in McSame's plan? If the employer has to pay tax also on the deduction amounts, doesn't that add a huge tax burden to employers, possibly causing some to just discontinue offering group health insurance? I haven't seen this addressed so I don't know if it's part of the plan or not. Does anyone know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrZeeLit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-16-08 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
7. Flying under the radar for most of those "avg Joe" pig-lovin' Repubs and Indies... send this out!
I have copied this and am sending it to a list of people (maybe they'll never be my "friends" again, but who cares, I'm saving my country).
Most of the people on my list are conservatives. They aren't, for the most part, rabid Repubs. I think I could sway a few.

I've decided to take the gloves off for this election.
In the past, I've been fair and direct, but I've never pushed. I've always thought, "they can figure this out; they're smart; it's their vote."

But... then someone on that list sent me a horrid, disgusting email about Obama (early on). And I checked with Snopes and debunked it. Then I asked for an apology. The sender (yeah, she is now a FORMER friend) got all huffy with me. Why should she apologize? Wow, after sending this filth to about 100 people and then being shown that she LIED to those people, she felt no remorse?

Every time I find an article that is vetted and truthful and exposes the differences in the candidates ("truth" being the operative word), I send the article.

I have already nudged a couple people over the line.

I think everybody should take a deep breath and give the TRUTH a try.

If you lose those friends, you might just want to rethink the need for their friendship: if they hate you for the truth, can they be your friends?

SEND THIS ARTICLE!
HEALTH CARE COVERAGE IS ESSENTIAL.
McCAIN WILL KILL OUR COVERAGE.
EVERYONE NEEDS TO KNOW THE TRUTH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC