Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kaptur: White House is counting on fear to propel...inappropriate action on a Wall Street bailout

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-09 04:44 PM
Original message
Kaptur: White House is counting on fear to propel...inappropriate action on a Wall Street bailout
Congresswoman Kaptur Votes Against
Bill To Bail Out 'Reckless' Wall Street


TOLEDO – U.S. Representative Marcy Kaptur (OH-9) this afternoon voted against the Wall Street bailout bill, which was defeated on the floor of the U.S. House of Representatives.

Kaptur, the senior woman in the House, addressed the issue in remarks on the House floor on Sunday evening. She disputed the contention by President Bush that America is facing the worst financial crisis in its history and accused the White House of using fear to pressure Congress into bailing out Wall Street. She also said Congress should approve no funding for a bailout until it establishes an economic crimes unit to investigate criminal activity that created the current situation.

“Taking a trillion dollars of taxpayer money and buying bushels of unknown and unvalued paper is not smart,” Kaptur said. “It will delay resolution of that housing crisis. In fact, this bill actually asks taxpayers to buy a garbage truckload of worthless paper, everything from subprime auto loans, to foreign bank loans, to hedge fund paper, to credit swaps. Every reckless Wall Street deal thought up these past several years they want to dump on us. We say: No.”

Kaptur said the current turmoil constitutes “a credit crisis, not a liquidity crisis,” and the bailout bill does not address it. “The housing bubble that burst is at the heart of our dilemma. Until Main Street housing foreclosures are remedied, the situation will not improve.”

Kaptur said, “We need the right deal, not a fast deal. The White House is counting on fear to propel this Congress into hasty and inappropriate action on a Wall Street bailout that is not in the interest of our Republic. There is a better way. In fact, it is as likely the expenditure of $700 billion will actually stand in the way of the most effective means to remedy the economic challenges facing us.”

Kaptur said the market problems of the 1980s, when 3,000 banks failed and interest rates hit 21 percent, posed a greater threat to the economy than the current crisis. Nonetheless, she said, “the economic instability was resolved in the financial system in a much more disciplined and rigorous way than taxpayers printing money for Wall Street.”

She said the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation response dealt with the earlier crisis effectively with no cash changing hands. FDIC, she said, resolved “thousands of problem situations” issued net worth certificates to get the nation through the credit shortage. The agency also regulated transactions with banks with subordinated debentures and promissory notes, assumed power over executive salaries and controlled dividends to restore health and rigor to the market.

“The FDIC also adopted a contingency plan to nationalize all institutions in the event it was necessary. The cost of the entire enterprise was $1.8 billion, resolving over $100 billion in problem institutions from the FDIC insurance fund, paid for by the banks, not the taxpayers. In other words, the market was used to heal the market, not set up a big government bureaucracy at the U.S. Treasury, run and overseen by the very reckless people who caused these problems in the first place,” she said.

Kaptur said the bailout bill fails to reform the Securities and Exchange Commission, which “more than any other regulatory body,” has caused the current problem “by its false accounting, overinflated leverage ratios and (destruction of ) fair value accounting.”

Finally, she said, Congress should create and fund an independent Emergency Financial Crimes Unit “to investigate the malfeasance, securities fraud, false accounting, and insider trading that were the root causes of this extravagance.”

http://www.marcykaptur.com/web/index.php?page=add6
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-09 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. yay
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-09 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. Would she like to be Treasury Secretary?
Because these are the words I've been longing to hear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-09 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Actually I'm pretty sure she wants to be the Speaker. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-09 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Kaptur ran for minority leader early in this decade when Dick Gephardt quit
The other contenders were Harold Ford and Nancy Pelosi. Kaptur said that this was the only chance for her to get the attention of the whole Congress. She was not seriously expecting to win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-09 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. She should run for Voinivich's seat. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-09 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. She Deserves To Be Speaker
Get Nancy off that table, NOW!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-09 08:11 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. I thought she was off the table, Oh wait it was just Impeachment. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnceUponTimeOnTheNet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-09 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. K&R nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-09 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. defeated on the floor of the U.S. House of Representatives.
change anyone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eomer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-09 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Defeated in the House on 9/29/08; subsequently passed by the House on 10/3/08.
This statement by Kaptur is referring to the vote on 9/29 when it failed. But it did pass a few days later. Kaptur voted against it both times.

Since there's no date in the OP it may appear this was a new vote that just happened this week. It's not -- it's an old statement.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-09 06:51 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. How do you know the date of the page?
I just found it yesterday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eomer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-09 08:24 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. A couple of ways.
  1. Google has a http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:TjBi1egJac8J:www.marcykaptur.com/web/index.php%3Fpage%3Dadd6+%22this+afternoon+voted+against+the+Wall+Street+bailout+bill%22+kaptur&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=us">cache of this page as of January 8 so it is at least that old.
  2. There hasn't been any new bailout bill voted on during the new Congress so this statement about a vote on a bailout would have to be a vote in 2008.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-15-09 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. very diligent
good job!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLAprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-14-09 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
7. Kaptur for SOTH, Kucinich for majority leader, DeFazio for something else :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC