http://msnbc.msn.com/id/4615500/On Sept. 14, 2001, I was in the press pool at ground zero and stood five feet from President Bush, who had mounted a crushed fire truck, slung his arm around an exquisitely wizened firefighter and told the world through a bullhorn that the terrorists would soon be hearing from the United States. It was more than a defining political moment for this president; it kicked off a period of bracing moral clarity. Whatever his stumbles on September 11 or before, Bush understood that a wounded nation needed clear lines drawn in the dust of the Twin Towers. He went on to deliver one of the finest speeches to Congress in modern memory.
Sadly, Bush has never understood that moral clarity is rooted in what might be called constitutional clarity. That's another way of saying accountability, which is itself a bureaucratic way of saying that for more than 200 years we've thrived on airing our messy, dirty and often tangled linen in public. It's an important part of who we are. Last week was a great one for constitutional clarity, not just at the 9/11 hearings on Capitol Hill but at the Supreme Court, where Michael Newdow, a nonlawyer dad atheist, got a chance to hold the government accountable for what he sees as its legal contradictions over the Pledge of Allegiance.
Whether one thinks Dick Clarke is an American grandstander, a Frank Capra hero or some mixture of the two, his appearance was, as Martha Stewart used to say, a good thing. He took responsibility for the failures of antiterrorism policy ("your government failed you"), which did more than provide some relief for the families of the 9/11 victims. It set the tone for an important national debate. Don't hold your breath waiting for Bill Clinton or Bush to admit they failed; beyond "mistakes were made"—Ronald Reagan's response to the Iran-contra scandal—presidents can't fall on their swords without weakening themselves. But after unconscionable foot-dragging by the White House, we're beginning to get to the bottom of the most searing event of our time. After years of arguing about sex and a million other passing dustups, it's the right argument at the right moment. Elections are supposed to be about big things like this.