Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

AT&T + U-Verse + Direct TV + Cingular + SBC + AT$T @ $16 Billion = Monopoly, that is against the Law

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Stinger2 Donating Member (352 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 12:04 AM
Original message
AT&T + U-Verse + Direct TV + Cingular + SBC + AT$T @ $16 Billion = Monopoly, that is against the Law

AT&T + U-Verse + Direct TV + Cingular + SBC + AT$T @ $16 Billion = Monopoly, that is against the Law.

AT&T, Inc., the largest telecommunications company in the United States following the merger in 2005 between SBC Communications Inc. and AT&T Corp. After receiving regulatory and shareholder approval to acquire AT&T in November 2005 for $16 billion, SBC decided to adopt the AT&T name, keeping alive the brand name of the former American Telephone and Telegraph Company, which held a virtual monopoly on telephone service in the United States until 1984, when it was forced to divest itself of local telephone operations under the terms of an antitrust agreement. The new company was named AT&T, Inc.

http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761590231/at_t_inc_.html

Monopoly

In economics, a monopoly (from Greek monos , alone or single + polein , to sell) exists when a specific individual or enterprise has sufficient control over a particular product or service to determine significantly the terms on which other individuals shall have access to it.<1> Monopolies are thus characterized by a lack of economic competition for the good or service that they provide and a lack of viable substitute goods.<2> The verb "monopolize" refers to the process by which a firm gains persistently greater market share than what is expected under perfect competition.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monopoly

AT&T Inc AT$T

After being broken up in the mid-1980s in a landmark antitrust case, this telecommunications icon re-formed in 2005, and became the nation’s largest phone company when SBC Communications bought AT&T Corp. for $16 billion. As SBC, the company led the fight to allow the Baby Bells to enter the long-distance market, where they hope to offer profitable broadband Internet services. Cable and telecom companies have been fighting over the issue for several years and recent legislation in the House would allow national cable franchises to be awarded to the telecoms. The cable industry complains this would allow telecoms to unfairly cherry-pick rich suburbs. The telecoms say that allowing states to issue all television licenses will drive down rates for consumers and add hundreds of channel choices. AT&T now has more than 49 million access lines in service. Cingular, which bought AT&T Wireless for $14 billion in 2004 and was part of SBC, is now in AT&T’s fold. Cingular is the leading US wireless carrier, with more than 54 million subscribers. And AT&T’s growth continues. In 2006, AT&T agreed to buy southern Baby Bell BellSouth in a deal valued at more than $65 billion.

http://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/summary.php?id=D000000076&lname=AT%26T

Total Lobbying Expenditures: by AT&T = $9,281,499
2004

http://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/clientsum.php?year=2004&lname=AT%26T

SBC Leads the Way in Political Pump-Priming $16 million lobbying $10 million in political contributions

The leading source of political froth in the states is San Antonio-based SBC Communications, the most aggressive of the dwindling family of "Baby Bell" companies. Now grown into a hulking bruiser, SBC spent $16 million lobbying state governments from 2003-2004 and another $10 million in political contributions from 1999 to 2004.

http://www.consumeraffairs.com/news04/2005/telco_lobby.html


During the anything goes Pay to Play lobbing (2004, $9,281,499) In the Bush administration AT&T started buying up Phone Companies spending Billions, then SBC buys up AT&T to make the deal. Now SBC is AT&T now acquired Direct TV, so they not only have the Phone Monopoly + Cingular they have Satalite Broadcasting, Called a Monopoly.

Time to Break them up again, like the Credit Card Companies, they will charge what they want and knock out all competition. My internet connection went from $14.99 to $50.00 soon as Acquisition of AT$T and SBC took over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 12:12 AM
Response to Original message
1. So switch to cable. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
givemebackmycountry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 12:18 AM
Response to Original message
2. I'm in this business...
I worked for Mountain Bell in the early eighties and was on the front line when this happened.
A year or two later AT&T had the largest single day force reduction in history.
24,000 thousand people.

I was one of them.

This shit matters to me because I ain't on the winning team anymore.
But, I'm still doing what I do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sen. Walter Sobchak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-05-09 01:45 AM
Response to Original message
3. this is the basic problem with the US economy
We allow unlimited corporate consolidation which creates giant, but completely dysfunctional monopolies. This is bad for consumers both because they fix prices and because they can crush any potential competitor. Even a dead rotting elephant can kill the healthiest body. It is also bad for the economy because it creates monsters that are too big to fail without having a severe macroeconomic impact, so we don't let them fail.

AT&T continues its rampage to this day as it buys up every independent cell phone carrier in the United States.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC