Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hedge fund manager makes $2.5 billion betting on US bailout of Wall Street

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-25-09 10:03 AM
Original message
Hedge fund manager makes $2.5 billion betting on US bailout of Wall Street

David Tepper, manager of the hedge fund Appaloosa Management, is set to pocket more than $2.5 billion this year after successfully gambling that the Obama administration would provide unlimited public funds to bail out the major banks. According to an article in Monday’s Wall Street Journal, Tepper’s firm, which specializes in buying up “distressed” shares and assets, has already racked up $7 billion in profits this year.


In the early stages of the bank bailout, the Journal reports, investors were fearful that the government might ultimately nationalize major banks, which would have wiped out shareholders. These fears, combined with the virtual collapse of credit markets and huge losses reported by some of the biggest Wall Street firms, led to a sharp fall in bank stocks.

But, according to the Journal, when the Obama administration announced its Financial Stability Plan in early February of this year, including a virtually open-ended commitment to inject capital into the banks, Tepper interpreted the plan as a signal that the government would do whatever was necessary to cover the bad debts of the financial elite. He took for good coin repeated statements by top administration officials that they had no intention of taking control of teetering Wall Street firms.

Thus, when most investors were dumping bank stocks, driving their prices to bargain basement levels, Tepper directed his traders to begin buying bank stocks and debt. By the end of the following month, the flood of cash, cheap loans and other government subsidies to the banks began to lift bank stock prices, fuelling a run-up on the markets that has seen the Dow rise by more than 50 percent since its lows in early March.

Tepper bet that the Obama administration would respond to the financial crash with an unprecedented plundering of the national treasury, and he bet right.

On February 20, for example, Bank of America stock hit a low of $2.53. Citigroup had fallen to 97 cents by March 5. Tepper responded by buying huge blocks of shares and cashing in when Citigroup shares tripled and Bank of America stock rose five-fold from its low point.

Tepper, the Journal reports, has generally kept his hedge fund profitable—it has averaged 30 percent yearly returns—by betting that markets would recover after major crises. During the Asian financial crisis of 1997, he bought Russian debt and Korean stocks, both of which staged major rebounds. He made a killing when commodity purchases he made in 2007 took off in value amid a general commodity price boom in 2008. “His biggest scores over the years have come from buying large chunks of out-of-favor investments,” the Journal notes.

However, his fund lost more than $1 billion in big bets in 2008, and its earnings fell 25 percent, worse than the industry’s average decline of 19 percent. His fortunes turned in 2009 when he bet everything on the government’s total subordination to Wall Street.

In many ways, Tepper’s success is emblematic of the social layers that have benefitted from the Obama administration’s financial policies, even as millions of workers have lost their jobs, seen their wages and benefits cut, lost their homes and been thrown into poverty.

This is how the Journal describes Mr. Tepper:

“The husky, bespectacled trader laughs easily, but employees say he can quickly turn on them when he’s angry. Mr. Tepper keeps a brass replica of a pair of testicles in a prominent spot on his desk, a present from former employees. He rubs the gift for luck during the trading day to get a laugh out of colleagues.”

The newspaper reports that Tepper has turned his attention to a new investment target, purchasing about $2 billion in “beaten-down” commercial mortgage-backed securities. He is betting that the government will make sure that the billions in such toxic assets on the books of the major banks will rebound, allowing the banks to eventually sell them off at top dollar.

To put Tepper’s windfall in perspective, his $2.5 billion in personal earnings this year is larger than the $2.4 billion allocated by the federal government for homeless assistance programs. It is equivalent to the medium household income of 50,000 Americans. His hedge fund’s $7 billion profit is greater than the gross domestic product of 57 of 190 countries listed in the 2008 CIA World Fact Book.

continued>>>>
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2009/dec2009/hedg-d22.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PuraVidaDreamin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-25-09 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
1. Audit this guy.
Big Time!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wapsie B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-25-09 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
2. That article just furthers class envy in this country!
Let the truly deserving get paid for their high value to society. Now go back to your menial jobs and your menial lives.


:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proteus_lives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-25-09 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
3. Good for him.
If he did nothing illegal then who cares.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Electric Monk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-25-09 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Right, it'll all trickle down, or something
You're consistent. I'll give you that.

Hail Raygun :/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proteus_lives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-25-09 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Who cares if it trickles down?
I simply don't care if other people make money legally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
classysassy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. Legality vs Morality
a legal giant but a moral midget.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnceUponTimeOnTheNet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-25-09 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
4. This article just takes my breath away.
The last line sums it all up nicely.

Tepper’s bonanza demonstrates further that the entire economic policy of the Obama administration has been crafted to preserve the wealth of this parasitical elite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hydra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-25-09 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Exactly!
Everyone says that what was done was done to keep the normal people out of trouble.

I know mass looting when I see it, though- Greenspan's friend did something similar, cashing out of the housing market right before the Sept. bubble pop and made something like $4 Billion doing so.

Billions of dollars for the people at the top via insider trading or betting against us, and nothing for the people who really need it. That's American Family Values for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
8. We should stop bailing out the housing market too.
Stop using Freddie and Fannie and let housing collapse back to where it is affordable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucky Luciano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. I take it you don't own a house. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Nope. It's not affordable and I'm being robbed of the opportunity to own a house by
The government. I'm getting really pissed off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucky Luciano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-26-09 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Ok, so a good plan would be to bankrupt most of the millons of
current homeowners so you could buy a house? There are already millions of mortgages that have negative equity - that has not worked out well for us as a country. Also, people that have paid/mostly paid off their mortgage get screwed too - no more retirement to a nice small place after selling the house!

I am not a homeowner either. I live in Manhattan, so I hear you on prices, but if I go to Hong Kong, Tokyo, London, Paris, etc the same phenomenon of expensive housing seems to exist, so this is not an American problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 04:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC