Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Guilty of Sedition? How the Right Is Undermining Our Government's Authority and Capability to Run

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Hestia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 12:06 AM
Original message
Guilty of Sedition? How the Right Is Undermining Our Government's Authority and Capability to Run
Guilty of Sedition? How the Right Is Undermining Our Government's Authority and Capability to Run the Country
By Sara Robinson, Campaign for America's Future
Posted on April 6, 2010, Printed on April 11, 2010
http://www.alternet.org/story/146322/

Sedition: Crime of creating a revolt, disturbance, or violence against lawful civil authority with the intent to cause its overthrow or destruction -- Brittanica Concise Dictionary

Well, finally. It's high time somebody had the guts to say the S-word -- sedition -- right out loud.

When the indictments against the Hutaree were unsealed last week, the S-word was right there, front and center, in Count One. The Justice Department accused them of "seditious conspiracy," charging that the defendants "did knowingly conspire, confederate, and agree with each other and other persons known and unknown...to levy war against the United States, and to prevent, hinder, and delay by force the execution of any United States law."

This is very serious stuff. But the Hutaree are getting nailed for sedition only because they crossed the line with inches to spare. They're by no means the only ones. Advocating, encouraging, and sanctioning sedition is the new norm on the conservative side.

We saw it again last Thursday, when the Guardians of the Free Republics -- a Sovereign Citizen group that believes that the oath of office taken by state governors is invalid under their twisted Bizarroland interpretation of the Constitution -- sent letters to most or all sitting state governors telling them to either a) take what they consider to be a legitimate oath of office; b) stand down; or c) or be removed "non-violently" within three days. The FBI, rightly, regards this as a potentially seditious threat against the governors.

These two events are a wake-up call for progressives. They're telling us that it's time to openly confront the fact that conservatives have spent the past 40 years systematically delegitimizing the very idea of US government. When they're in power, they mismanage it and defund it. When they're out of power, they refuse to participate in running the country at all -- indeed, they throw all their energy into thwarting the democratic process any way they can. When they need to win an election, they use violent, polarizing, eliminationist language against their opponents to motivate their base. This is sedition in slow motion, a gradual corrosive undermining of the government's authority and capability to run the country. And it's been at the core of their politics going all the way back to Goldwater.

===

Take note - they are mapping people's homes - targeting - so they'll know who to go after when their version supposedly comes down.

Repent Amarillo's Spiritual Mapping and Vigilantism

http://www.talk2action.org/story/2010/3/6/95620/29842
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 12:17 AM
Response to Original message
1. K & R. I was thinking about yesterday's joint Michigan Militia/Open Carry Tea Party
festivities that were advertised for April 10 on the MM's website.

I hope there were some observers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamtechus Donating Member (868 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 01:38 AM
Response to Original message
2. You don't have to "act" to overthrow the gov with seditious conspiracy
The Seditious Conspiracy statute was used against Puerto Rican separatists several times in the 1900s as well as against a blind muslin cleric and 11 of his followers. The RICO statute (corrupt organization) has also been used in such cases. Google will produce a bunch of info on this stuff.

"A person can be convicted of seditious conspiracy without the Government showing that the defendant committed any specific act to further the conspiracy. This is a departure from other conspiracy laws, like the racketeering statutes that are often used against organized-crime figures".

1995 NY Times Article
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
my2sense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 07:21 AM
Response to Original message
3. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC