Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Incompatible Interests: The Truth Blurs for Bush and Schroder

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
mgc1961 Donating Member (874 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 10:21 AM
Original message
Incompatible Interests: The Truth Blurs for Bush and Schroder
Despite the unpleasant things they have said about each other lately, former US President George W. Bush and former German Chancellor Gerhard Schröder used to get along relatively well. Both men shared a dislike of the formal aspect of politics and liked to loosen things up with brash remarks or little jokes. Once, when someone mentioned the possibility of smoking a cigar with a glass of red wine after an early dinner at the White House, the German chancellor asked the president whether he had Cuban cigars. It was obvious that he didn't, given the fact that the United States imposed an embargo on the socialist island nation almost 50 years ago, but the two macho leaders had themselves a good laugh over Schröder's comment.

That episode took place on Jan. 31, 2002, a date that has taken on near-historic significance after the fact. The former US president argues that deep rift between the United States and Germany over the campaign against Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein was created on that day. In his just-published memoirs, Bush mentions the meeting and accuses Schröder of breaking his promise. According to Bush, it was on that day that the German chancellor had promised him that his country would support Bush in a war against Iraq, just as it had in Afghanistan. Bush claims that Schröder distanced himself from that pledge later on, during the next election campaign. Once that trust was violated," he writes, "it was hard to have a constructive relationship."

Not true, says Schröder, who insists that he never made any such commitment to Bush or broke his word. Indeed, Schröder says, Bush is "not telling the truth" in his memoirs.

In a court of law, it would be Schröder's word against Bush's. But which one of them is right?


Read the rest of the story at http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,729047,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DavidDvorkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. I know which one my instinct tells me to believe
Edited on Sun Nov-14-10 01:31 PM by DavidDvorkin
Let's see. Fake cowboy/fake president or competent, intelligent leader? Hmm. Hard choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mgc1961 Donating Member (874 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-14-10 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Agreed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 02:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC