Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Non-violence is the ONLY solution.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
johnson542 Donating Member (11 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-11 04:21 PM
Original message
Non-violence is the ONLY solution.
As a 24-year-old supporter of the Occupy Wall Street movement, I am hearing more and more calls for violent revolution amongst my peers. I see the call to bring weapons growing on Facebook, and some of my friends who have attended OWS with me have spoken of how it would be "cool" if we fought back, or that violence is the only way to get true change. Yes, the police are out of hand. They will beat us, gas us, violate our rights, and they may even kill some of us. But violence is not the answer. In the aftermath of the Kent State shootings, 58% of the American public placed the blame for the killings on anti-war protesters. If Kent State happened today and were caught on a cell phone camera, the public blame for the protesters wouldn't even come close to 50%.  A Kent State type event would likely galvanize the nation and the movement like the Anthony Bologna pepper spray incident, but on a much larger scale. However, if the protesters are the ones escalating the violence, it would be a whole different story.  

We have to remain vigilant. We must not only emphasize non-violence, we must demand it and enforce it. All it takes to change the entire national dialogue is one person with a gun. Hell, the 1% could hire someone to try to spark a violent event and take the movement down. It wouldn't be the first time. We must do everything in our power to prevent this from happening. 

Still, I'm worried. We can continue to spread the message of non-violence, but will the message really stick with the Grand Theft Auto generation? This is the real deal. You can't enter a cheat code and get infinite lives or make your wanted level disappear. If we bring rocks, they'll bring rubber bullets and flash bang grenades. If we bring bats, they'll bring guns. If we bring guns, they'll bring helicopters and the National Guard, and it won't be pretty. Public support for the movement would sink like a stone overnight.  This movement is about getting a message out - a message that would be lost if the blood being spilled in the streets is on our hands. 
Refresh | +24 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-11 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. k/r
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-11 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. I agree. I don't see many advocating violence though.
Hopefully it will remain that way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-11 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. It wouldn't take many at all to start a disaster. One person alone could pull one trigger.
Edited on Wed Oct-26-11 04:27 PM by pnwmom
That would be the beginning of the end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Lucinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-11 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. We can't control it though. There are many many people who would pay someone
to start the fire. And a few freaks that would do it for the fun of it.
All we can really do is keep doing what we are doing and get the word out. Scary times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-11 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. We can control our own language. Emphasize peaceful behavior and discourage open carry. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DonCoquixote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-11 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. read tedrall.com
he has been advocating violence since day one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
iamthebandfanman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-11 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
7. if it gets to that
my only hope is thats its non-lethal types of retaliation...

id have no problem with protesters buying gas masks and using those strobe or sound devices back at police personally..

you can buy all that crap online these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-11 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
8. Accuse those who are advocating violence of being police infiltrators
or FBI or CIA even. That WILL shut up the honest participants, and may even forestall the 5th columnists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-11 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #8
16. +1
NGU.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-27-11 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Never Give Up, Never Surrender!
I love Galaxy Quest!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-11 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
9. I haven't seen a single soul advocating violence. Yours is the first mention of it.
OWS is, by its very nature, a peaceful civil disobedience action/movement. Your friends need to real a little Ghandi and MLK to understand before they ever show up at an OWS protest.

ALL moral high ground is lost the instant one turns to violence. Even my dad, who was a career military officer, taught me this. NEVER strike the first blow. If you really want moral superiority and a winning hand, you maintain your nonviolence in the face of physical attack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
RevStPatrick Donating Member (564 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-11 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
10. Very well said, young man!
K&R

Non-violence is going to hurt a bit in the short run, but will win in the long run.
We have to "be the change we want to see in the world," and the whole world will be with us.
One clip of some kid throwing rocks at the cops on Youtube, and the jig is up.
The one percent is actually quite precarious, but will always prevail in a violence spiral.
They won't know how to react, in the long run, if we don't stoop to their tactics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
happyslug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-11 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
11. Violence has its place, but we are a LONG away from any situation where violence would do any good
Violence has its place in any movement, but it must be looked at by the Vast Majority of Americans as something that HAD to be done. To get to that point we MUST get the vast majority of Americans to SUPPORT what the people occupying Wall Street are "fighting" for (Fighting in the sense they are trying to do a change, not in any act of violence).

First we must see how violence in any movement for change happens. Violence in the sense of suppressing dissent is always an option of any ruling elite. The majority of Americans will support such violence suppression if the ruling elite can show it is needed for the common good. AS a movement builds up support among the American People the Ruling elite will do all it can suppress it, including increasing the use of violence to suppress the movement. The movement must continued to be non-violent during this time period to show it is NOT for some radical over throw of Society but for peaceful reform of society. Yes, violence must be meet with non-violence during that time period, which we are only entering at the present time.

The problem for the ruling elite is when the vast majority of Americans decide that the change being advocated by the movement is needed, change that is opposed by the Ruling Elite. This situation leads to even more use of violence by the Ruling Elite to stay in charge and present the proposed change. When that happens and the vast majority of the American People REJECT that use of force by the Ruling elites for the vast majority of Americans want the change, then and only then can any act of violence do any good. This is for the simple reason that any change MUST have the support of the vast Majority of American People and any act NOT supported by the Vast Majority of American people is doomed to fail. Thus only when the vast majority of the American people support the movement AND the reason the change is NOT being done is do to the violence being ordered by the Ruling Elites, then and only then can the act of violence do any good (i.e. chase away the thugs hired to keep the ruling elite in power and get the change the vast majority of the American People want).

Now, in most cases BEFORE any movement reaches that point, the Politicians of the US accept that change and implants what is being demanded. Thus in most cases no time comes up for when violence does any good.

On the other hand (And Karl Marx made this observation) when a ruling elite sees themselves losing control, they revert to violence themselves to stay in power. When this occurs the time to use violence is close, but even then you want to make it clear that the act of doing violence is being FORCED upon you by the ruling elites. Thus even in such times you have to hold PEACEFUL meetings and see them attacked by thugs (the best name for whoever is hired to do the work, these may be the Police, may be the Army, but also may be private thugs hired do to the increasing unreliability of the Police and Army to do such acts of Violence when such acts no longer is supported by the majority of Americans).

Violence is only called for when everything else has been tried and the ruling elite use of violence is the only thing stopping change from occurring does any act of violence does any good (again assuming the vast majority of American people support the change).

My point is violence has its place, but this movement is no where near any time when it can do any good. We have to "fight" (in a peaceful manner) to show we want change and what change we want, but this has to be peaceful in the sense that the movement can NOT be the side that starts any violence. We have to force the other side (Wall Street) to force the issue, do they accept the change or do they declare war on us? If they declare war on us, then and only then can violence do any good. We also have to understand and accept that the Declaration of War will NOT be done publicly, but will be clear to all as the amount of violence increases. Thus only after Wall Street has made it clear it prefers us dead to agreeing to change will the majority of Americans see Wall Street as it is, and support the violence needed to finished the war declared by Wall Street.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
lg59kis Donating Member (50 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-11 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
12. Great post
And I agree with every single word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-11 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
13. non-violence will eventually persuade enough of the cops they are on the wrong side
then it will be over for the 1%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
tcaudilllg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-11 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
14. What if there is no solution
and you just have to do the best you can?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
tcaudilllg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-11 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. But I agree, violence should be avoided.
But please, don't take one for the team.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-11 05:42 AM
Response to Original message
18. Maybe. But let's not forget that the teabaggers' threats of violence
got them 60 Congressional seats, even though their numbers are tiny compared to OWS. Meanwhile the Occupy movement has had no appreciable effect on the behavior of our "representatives".

Your post is very well-reasoned. But change will not happen unless those who currently run things feel some sort of threat. Hopefully the sheer number will pose that threat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC