|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Carl Spackler (145 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-31-04 08:14 PM Original message |
I don't go with LIHOP or MIHOP. I think bush is just an idiot. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud patriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-31-04 08:27 PM Response to Original message |
1. I put the incompetence theory to the test , but it failed IMHO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lovedems (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-31-04 08:32 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. You are 100% correct. It took me awhile to come around to LIHOP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jawja (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-01-04 11:02 AM Response to Reply #2 |
21. Yes, I find it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
salinen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-31-04 08:34 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Chimps incompetence is legendary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Minstrel Boy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-31-04 08:44 PM Response to Reply #1 |
7. Not only has no one been fired, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carl Spackler (145 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-31-04 09:08 PM Response to Reply #1 |
10. No, incompetence is usually buried |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Darranar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-01-04 11:25 AM Response to Reply #10 |
25. Exactly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sterling (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-01-04 12:20 PM Response to Reply #10 |
43. Not true at all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Selwynn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-01-04 11:18 AM Response to Reply #1 |
22. What does "put it to the test" mean? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud patriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-01-04 02:40 PM Response to Reply #22 |
60. After months of researching |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Darranar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-01-04 11:23 AM Response to Reply #1 |
23. Why? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-31-04 08:37 PM Response to Original message |
4. It's not that they're stupid, exactly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Intelsucks (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-31-04 08:41 PM Response to Original message |
5. I don't think anything that went on at the Security Council was a surprise |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gristy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-01-04 10:32 AM Response to Reply #5 |
20. No they don't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-31-04 08:43 PM Response to Original message |
6. It's both MIHOP and he's an idiot |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eloriel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-31-04 08:50 PM Response to Original message |
8. If you don't buy LIHOP or MIHOP, then |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carl Spackler (145 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-31-04 09:10 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. Read my sig |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solomon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-01-04 12:26 PM Response to Reply #8 |
44. Even the incompetence theory requries a massive |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThoughtCriminal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-31-04 08:58 PM Response to Original message |
9. I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carl Spackler (145 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-31-04 09:13 PM Response to Reply #9 |
12. Finishing the goat story |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Minstrel Boy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-31-04 10:22 PM Response to Reply #12 |
16. "I've pretty much read all the LIHOP and MIHOP stuff" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Selwynn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-01-04 11:32 AM Response to Reply #16 |
26. YES - I have indeed read every single one of those links |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carl Spackler (145 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-01-04 11:48 AM Response to Reply #26 |
31. What he said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Q (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-01-04 08:46 AM Response to Reply #12 |
18. When Standard Operating Procedure is not followed... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Selwynn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-01-04 11:42 AM Response to Reply #18 |
29. There is no standard operating procedure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Q (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-01-04 11:52 AM Response to Reply #29 |
32. What bunk! It has ALWAYS been SOP to intercept hijacked planes... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Selwynn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-01-04 12:15 PM Response to Reply #32 |
40. Yes - untried, untested, un-actioned "proceedure" to do something... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leesa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-01-04 12:09 PM Response to Reply #29 |
37. Crap. There are standard operating procedures for highjackings and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Selwynn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-01-04 12:19 PM Response to Reply #37 |
42. That scenario has never happened before. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eloriel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-01-04 12:38 PM Response to Reply #42 |
49. There is an overabundance of credible evidence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Selwynn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-01-04 01:26 PM Response to Reply #49 |
52. Guess what, no it isn't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
drdigi420 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-01-04 01:46 PM Response to Reply #42 |
56. why do you keep claiming that there are no SOP? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leesa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-01-04 12:06 PM Response to Reply #12 |
36. I highly doubt you have read anything with an open mind |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Malva Zebrina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-31-04 09:24 PM Response to Original message |
13. I don't think he ever had the people of this nation in mind |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pretzel4gore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-31-04 09:28 PM Response to Original message |
14. the proof is, they're getting away with it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sterling (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-01-04 12:29 PM Response to Reply #14 |
45. I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
calimary (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-31-04 09:35 PM Response to Original message |
15. WHATEVER has them scrambling and floundering, I like. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElsewheresDaughter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-01-04 08:22 AM Response to Original message |
17. Bush is Not a Fuck-up......(nor an idiot!!! )............read this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-01-04 09:54 AM Response to Original message |
19. That would make not only Bush, but all of them idiots. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Darranar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-01-04 11:24 AM Response to Original message |
24. There is not enough evidence for LIHOP or MIHOP... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Minstrel Boy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-01-04 11:39 AM Response to Reply #24 |
28. "the fact that they could have done it does not make it true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Darranar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-01-04 11:43 AM Response to Reply #28 |
30. I actually have read many of the conspiracy theories... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sterling (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-01-04 12:38 PM Response to Reply #30 |
48. It's not the theories you need to read. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leesa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-01-04 12:13 PM Response to Reply #24 |
39. Then why are they obstructing the investigation? Why did they tamper |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Darranar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-01-04 12:36 PM Response to Reply #39 |
47. They DO have something to hide... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gulliver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-01-04 11:34 AM Response to Original message |
27. You are right of course. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Q (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-01-04 12:00 PM Response to Reply #27 |
34. It's disturbing to see those who seek the truth... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Selwynn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-01-04 12:12 PM Response to Reply #34 |
38. But you don't seek truth. You seek to confirm your own biases. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Minstrel Boy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-01-04 01:25 PM Response to Reply #38 |
51. All you do, Selwynn, is confirm your own bias |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Selwynn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-01-04 01:39 PM Response to Reply #51 |
54. My first question would be: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Selwynn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-01-04 01:42 PM Response to Reply #51 |
55. You can only confirm bias if you hold a conclusion - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beam Me Up (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-01-04 01:36 PM Response to Reply #38 |
53. Wait JUST a minute |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Selwynn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-01-04 01:46 PM Response to Reply #53 |
57. I agree - open questions warrant closer scrutiny |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gulliver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-01-04 01:52 PM Response to Reply #34 |
58. Seeking the truth is not that easy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pretzel4gore (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 08:00 PM Response to Reply #27 |
61. i resent that! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WhoCountsTheVotes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-01-04 11:58 AM Response to Original message |
33. We must back away from the conspiracy theories before the General Election |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Q (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-01-04 12:05 PM Response to Reply #33 |
35. Here comes the myth of the swing voter again... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leesa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-01-04 12:15 PM Response to Reply #33 |
41. You can't explain what happened via incompetence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Selwynn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-01-04 01:13 PM Response to Reply #41 |
50. Not overwhelming evidence, overwhelming speculative inference |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Q (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-01-04 02:25 PM Response to Reply #50 |
59. "speculative inference" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Astarho (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-01-04 12:33 PM Response to Original message |
46. Not an either/or |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
x-g.o.p.er (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 08:04 PM Response to Original message |
62. What does LIHOP and MIHOP stand for? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carl Spackler (145 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 08:10 PM Response to Reply #62 |
63. Here you go: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
x-g.o.p.er (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-03-04 08:18 PM Response to Reply #63 |
64. Thanks!! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 04:24 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC