|
"If there were no WMDs, then why did the Iraqis have the large stores of chemical suits, gas masks and atropine on hand? Saddam's behavior and the existence of these anti-biochem warfare supplies are evidence that the weapons existed up until a short time before the invasion."
And, since US troops went into Iraq with all these same things, that proves that the US intended to use them, right? Or it proves that the US was afraid Iraq was going to use them... Just as Iraq was afraid that the US was going to use them... Just as Iran did use them against Iraq...
"And have we forgotten about the last resolution calling for "immediate and unconditional" dismantling of WMDs or the proof showing that that process is taking place? Does "immediate" mean "at your discretion"? Does "unconditional" mean "on your terms"? For that reason alone, we were justified in doing the work that the U.N. should've done."
Now, prove that you are dismantling the WMD's that you say you don't have. If you cannot, we will invade. And see my sig line.
|