Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"It's a Quid Pro Quo" - BushCO exchanges Khan pardon for access to Osama

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-04 07:03 PM
Original message
"It's a Quid Pro Quo" - BushCO exchanges Khan pardon for access to Osama
Edited on Mon Mar-01-04 07:06 PM by Stephanie
Once again BushCO endangers the whole world in service to their political expediencies. July Surprise?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/?040308fa_fact

THE DEAL
by SEYMOUR M. HERSH
Why is Washington going easy on Pakistan’s nuclear black marketers?
Issue of 2004-03-08
Posted 2004-03-01

<snip>

Musharraf, who seized power in a coup d’état in 1999, has been a major ally of the Bush Administration in the war on terrorism. According to past and present military and intelligence officials, however, Washington’s support for the pardon of Khan was predicated on what Musharraf has agreed to do next: look the other way as the U.S. hunts for Osama bin Laden in a tribal area of northwest Pakistan dominated by the forbidding Hindu Kush mountain range, where he is believed to be operating. American commanders have been eager for permission to conduct major sweeps in the Hindu Kush for some time, and Musharraf has repeatedly refused them. Now, with Musharraf’s agreement, the Administration has authorized a major spring offensive that will involve the movement of thousands of American troops.

Musharraf has proffered other help as well. A former senior intelligence official said to me, “Musharraf told us, ‘We’ve got guys inside. The people who provide fresh fruits and vegetables and herd the goats’” for bin Laden and his Al Qaeda followers. “It’s a quid pro quo: we’re going to get our troops inside Pakistan in return for not forcing Musharraf to deal with Khan.”

The spring offensive could diminish the tempo of American operations in Iraq. “It’s going to be a full-court press,” one Pentagon planner said. Some of the most highly skilled Special Forces units, such as Task Force 121, will be shifted from Iraq to Pakistan. Special Forces personnel around the world have been briefed on their new assignments, one military adviser told me, and in some cases have been given “warning orders”—the stage before being sent into combat.

<snip>

The greatest risk may be not to Musharraf, or to the stability of South Asia, but to the ability of the international nuclear monitoring institutions to do their work. Many experts fear that, with Khan’s help, the world has moved closer to a nuclear tipping point. Husain Haqqani, who was a special assistant to three prime ministers before Musharraf came to power and is a visiting scholar at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, noted, with some pride, that his nation had managed to make the bomb despite American sanctions. But now, he told me, Khan and his colleagues have gone wholesale: “Once they had the bomb, they had a shopping list of what to buy and where. A. Q. Khan can bring a plain piece of paper and show me how to get it done—the countries, people, and telephone numbers. ‘This is the guy in Russia who can get you small quantities of enriched uranium. You in Malaysia will manufacture the stuff. Here’s who will miniaturize the warhead. And then go to North Korea and get the damn missile.’” He added, “This is not a few scientists pocketing money and getting rich. It’s a state policy.”

<more>

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Monkey see Monkey Do Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-04 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. scary scary times.
The hypocrisy is staggering. Turn a complete blind eye to the (official) exposure of massive nuclear proliferation in return for an October suprise.

(shivers)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-04 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I think the surprise will be in July. Or August.
They'll want to parade Osama around a bit before Bush* heads down to the World Trade site to dance on the graves of the 3000 for his coronation party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monkey see Monkey Do Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-04 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Y'know, what wouldn't suprise me
capture in the near future

swift trial

televised death penalty to co-incide with the GOP convention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-04 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Maybe
I thought they would do that with Saddam - long, drawn out trial, like the OJ trial, only with torture victims testifying for weeks and months. I can't see an Osama trial. But maybe.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-04 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. Thanks for the link. I heard of this on NPR tonight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-04 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. That's where I heard it - Daniel Shorr's commentary.
http://www.npr.org/rundowns/rundown.php?prgDate=01-Mar-2004&prgId=2

Commentary: Bargaining with Pakistan

Senior news analyst NPR's Daniel Schorr says that in exchange for military access to Pakistan's border regions -- helpful in the hunt for Osama bin Laden -- the Bush administration may have agreed to overlook the trafficking of nuclear secrets by Pakistani scientist Abdul Qadeer Khan.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maggrwaggr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-04 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. yup. that's what I figured out about two weeks ago
and here ya go.

Disgusting. Musharef is everything we were told Saddam was, yet we're his buddy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nefarious Donating Member (132 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-04 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. That's the buddy du jour
The US used to be Saddam's buddy during the war with Iran, but he was lured into invading Kuwait by GHW's gambit to gain political mileage for being tough on naked aggression, ie preventing any players from having too much control in the oil game.

Don't worry, the US will turn on Musharraf once he's no longer any use to us or some valuable resouces pop up in Pakistan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maggrwaggr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-04 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
5. Bushco is a menace to the world. No joke.
WE CAN'T WAIT FOR THE GODDAMN ELECTIONS TO GET RID OF HIM!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-04 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. No kidding.
What's it going to take?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BabsSong Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-04 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
7. From the "Get Go" something stunk in the state of Pakistan
Hi--first post though been reading you for like 2 years......I thought that something stunk on the Pakistan front from the get go. In fact I can't understand the media convenient blank memory. We were pouring a ton of loot into Mashirif (sp.??) when we invaded Afganistan and he wanted more. At that time it already broke on international news that they were selling nuke secrets out the back door to Korea. Yet, our friendly dictator wanted more money and we gave it to him. Suddenly the press has no memory of that. It was something at the time thoroughly quoted and discussed on this DU. This little "friendly dictator" is slime and we keep filling his pockets. However, I'm not sure we are playing him to find bin Laden because I tend to agree with Madleine Albright that bin Laden is already in custody. Bush has played him for 3 years to frighten the American people. When they annouced the great efforts to launch of spring offensive, I thought to myself that they are laying the groundwork to produce what they know they can produce right in time for election '04. That's the way they work. If they still had him at large, they wouldn't mention the subject because it would just add to their embarrassment that they couldn't find him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-04 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Welcome to DU, BabsSong!
When did Madeleine Albright say that? I'd love to see it.

You may be right and this may be some disinfo by the neo-cons as a prelude to the August Suprise. But that wouldn't explain the Kahn pardon. It makes more sense to me in this context.

Thanks for posting - I'm honored to get your first post!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-04 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. tongue in cheek
...Albright joked about that in the green room somewhere before a TV appearance, and was quoted.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,106012,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ariellyn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 12:00 AM
Response to Original message
14. And they are holding Saddam...for a flood of news later in the year
I think I'll plan my vacation around the late summer because the American media will be even more unbearable--if that is actually possible as they parade bin Laden and Saddam back and forth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dusty64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 07:51 AM
Response to Original message
15. This is just the tip of the iceberg.
x
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-04 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. What are you referring to?
Curious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC