Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What is the job description for National Security Adviser?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
anarchy1999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 04:22 AM
Original message
What is the job description for National Security Adviser?
Edited on Fri Apr-09-04 04:27 AM by anarchy1999
I'm watching Condi again at 4:00 in the morning and I just get angrier. Does she have a job description, duties to fufill, etc as NSA?

The way she turned the people asking questions upside down, would not answer questions, fillibustered, oh, the list just goes on.

Why are "we" letting "them" get away with this? I am more confused than I ever have been in my life. I thought Iran-Contra was the height of arrogance, boy, was I misled. WaterGate, Iran-Contra were all just dress rehearsals (sp?).

I'm outraged, but we that are upset are only what, 30%, and that is a misguided 30%, right?

If we let this administration get away with this deception we deserve what we get, and folks, it is coming our way. In the form of a runaway train. We only have a short amount of time left to change it, and just like many others have said, including John Dean, Chalmers Johnson, Gore Vidal, Vincent Bugliosi, and Howard Zinn, it may already be too late.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ConcernedCanuk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 04:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. Read some of the analysis by our Canuk reporters and correspondents
.
.
.

I kept track of them and posted them in another thread.

Check them out here

,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shockingelk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 04:40 AM
Response to Original message
2. yeah, job description
Rice: "I don't remember the al Qaeda cells being something that we were told we needed to do something about."

So the National Security Advisor was waiting to be told that al Qaeda terrorist cells in the US deserved attention? Is this really what she was saying? Who's job is it to advise the security advisor?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lexingtonian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 04:49 AM
Response to Original message
3. sure she had a job description
As far as I can tell, she was the Assistant VP in charge of the effort to run over and crush the remaining weakling Soviet client states. North Korea and such. (Colin's job was to save his victory in the Gulf War by ginning up a war against Saddam Hussein.) She was one of the hostile takeover specialists hired to knock off this bunch of geopolitical midgets in a manner that could pretend to justifiability.

Of course, this job description has nothing to do with any reasonable definition of 'security'. And, judging from her performance and rationalizations, she obviously wasn't selected for or told to perform according to any meaningful standards of leadership.

Yes, it's always kinda wierd how banal and pointless and pathetic Republican governance really tends to be. It's always about a sense of entitlement to theft and violent abuse- and never much more, it turns out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConcernedCanuk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 05:12 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. From a past National Security Advisor: Sandy Berger
.
.
.

JUDY WOODRUFF, CNN ANCHOR: Hello, just a moment ago the Senate Governmental Affairs Committee got under way and resumed hearings. Today the witness is the highest-ranking official of the Clinton administration yet to testify before this committee. He is Sandy Berger, the president's national security adviser. As you can see, he has just taken the oath and seated himself at the witness table. Let's listen.

SEN. FRED THOMPSON (R), GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS CHMN.: Thank you very much. Mr. Berger, we do appreciate your being with us this morning. I know that it's not unprecedented for a person in your position to come to the Hill and testify, but it's not an every day occurrence, to say the least. It is appreciated by this committee. We, of course, will avoid any matters that have to do with national security matters. Any thing that we might get into in that area can be taken up in closed session. But it will not be necessary to get into that in open session.

So, if you would, please generally explain the responsibilities of the National Security Council and the roles played by the assistant to the president for national security affairs and the two deputies.


SANDY BERGER, NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISER:
The National Security Council itself, Mr. Chairman, was established almost 50 years ago by Congress, and as a formal matter consists of the president, the vice president, and his senior cabinet officials.

The NSC staff, which is the functioning day to day operation, is essentially the professional foreign policy staff that serves as chief adviser to the president and vice president on foreign policy matters, seeks to coordinate the various departments and agencies with responsibility on national security, seeks to assure that the president has the best advice possible to make decisions, is engaged in managing crises, and implementing the policies where the president makes a decision.


I think she failed

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anarchy1999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 05:18 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. As I read your post I thought to myself, I think she failed.
Edited on Fri Apr-09-04 05:18 AM by anarchy1999
There at the bottom of your post you put it in very large letters.

Our NSA, Condaleeza Rice, FAILED her post.

Thank you, Canuck.

Thank you and all the rest of the Canadians that are sitting close by wanting to see this all end well. Where would we be without you guys?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anarchy1999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 05:13 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Ouch!
n/t

I guess there is really nothing to add to your analysis. Strikes me as kind of dead on. Much as I do not like it. Pathetic, actually, but oh well, I guess we get what we deserve.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dd123 Donating Member (226 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 05:17 AM
Response to Original message
6. I came to the conclusion that she was ill suited for her job
many months ago after I read an article by Walter Pincus describing her "college seminar" style of holding meetings. I can't find the article now, but the gist was that everyone at the meeting would express their opinions and Condi would listen politely, but at the end of the meeting, no consensus was reached and nothing was resolved.

After that, nothing surprises me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 05:50 AM
Response to Original message
8. window dressing
and to aLso expLain big words to the president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Loonman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 06:47 AM
Response to Original message
9. She doesn't do shit, from what I heard
Eliminate the position or give her something to do besides repeating Rummy and Bush talking points.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DinahMoeHum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-09-04 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
10. There was an obvious lack of imagination and initiative
on CondoPizza's part - and that's putting it charitably.

:evilfrown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC