I was looking for something else, and came across this article, dated November 2003:
Through "back channel" contacts, Hussein agreed to virtually unconditional surrender. He authorized intermediaries to accept any and all actions Bush demanded as conditions for calling off the invasion.
The story was laid out by James Risen of the New York Times (Nov. 5) and Newsweek's Michael Isikoff and Mark Hosenball (Nov. 5 on their Web site). Hussein was finally and belatedly convinced that he had no choice but to accede to U.S. demands.
His intermediary met with Richard Perle, a member of Rumsfeld's Defense Policy Board, and told him that Hussein was ready to step down and let Iraqis elect their next leader.
Hussein promised oil concessions to the U.S. He committed Iraq to the war against al-Qaida and terrorism. He pledged Iraq's assistance in bringing peace between Israel and Palestine.
Hussein swore on a stack of Korans (correctly, we've discovered) that Iraq had no storehouses of chemical, biological or nuclear weapons. He agreed to give full cooperation to as many weapons inspectors as the U.S. wanted to send.
In short, Hussein offered everything that Bush told us was necessary to avert an attack.
Was Hussein's offer serious? We'll never know. But what would it have cost Bush and his war hawks to check the offer out? A week's delay, two weeks?http://www.lowcountrynow.com/stories/111403/LOCrose.shtml