Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kerry Beats Bush 63% to 35%, with Nader Taking 2% - My Prediction

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-04 03:23 PM
Original message
Kerry Beats Bush 63% to 35%, with Nader Taking 2% - My Prediction
Edited on Fri May-07-04 03:24 PM by ThomWV
That is how I see the popular vote comming out, 63 to 35 with Nader skimming about 2% who would not have voted otherwise. How do you see it?

Edited to correct crappy math
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-04 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. wow 110%
Edited on Fri May-07-04 03:28 PM by AZDemDist6
I see dead people voting!

edited to add ROFL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DonP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-04 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
17. Welcome to a Chicago style election
Where our citizenry is so public spirited they continue to vote years after death!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveElmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-04 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. That's 110% man
Hope you're kiddin ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phillybri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-04 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. Is this what's known as giving 110%????
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nickinSTL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-04 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. 109%?
Edited on Fri May-07-04 03:25 PM by nickinSTL
Uh, your numbers don't add up.

---

Never mind, been fixed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-04 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
5. I have the same thought as well....
right after I smoke a bowl.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue-Jay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-04 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
6. Let's see...
63 + 45 + 2 = 110

Sounds good to me!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mattforclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-04 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
7. Me says
Kerry 51.2
Bush 47.4
Nadir .6
Other .8
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-04 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
8. I don't really think
Edited on Fri May-07-04 03:35 PM by PATRICK
Nader can scrape two percent if the aroused electorate votes in greater numbers based of the Kerry/Bush contest. Whatever Nader has done to bring his core in, the new size of the game may swamp whatever he still can muster. Only, those who voted for Gore and definitely see that Kerry will win in a landslide might finally be able to vote their real wishes without fear.

Otherwise, as things now stand, I think your prediction may be quite on the money. But "now" means nothing as we have seen before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-04 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
9. Kerry 54% * 43% Nader 3%
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ACK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-04 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. You got the figures down truebrit71
Sorry for the landslide crowd.

I like Kerry a lot. Hell, in this politically f*cked nation, I am just glad to get to vote for someone left of Clinton that has a snowballs chance in hell of winning.

Fuck all the naysayers, I know that is sad but at least I honestly believe that Kerry is a good man.

The country has been polarized to the point that I cannot imagine at least 43% of the nation voting for smirk boy. They are that deluded by the corporate press and the Repuke media machine.

_
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zinfandel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-04 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
11. So you think Bush spending 300 million dollars on ads in about 12 states.
Edited on Fri May-07-04 03:59 PM by Zinfandel
and on cable news (for the rest of the country) ads running night and day, will have very little effect?

Everyone knows money buys elections, that's why Clinton was so well funded, he knew...The Republicans absolutely know and believe this!

We are a corporate run country now, completely and the corporations donate overwhemingly fund the republicans,,,that's why the republicans run this country for the corporations...President, the Senate, The Congress and the Supreme Court. (and the corporations own the media). Money buys elections.

The Republican who overwhelmingly out spends their opponent usually wins. If they spend about equal amounts the Democrat almost always wins. If the Democrat overwhelmingly out spends his opponent, he always win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-04 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
12. I'm a pessimist
Bush 51%
Kerry 47%
Nader 2%


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zinfandel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-04 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. I'd have to agree, those seem about right to me.
I'd give Kerry another point

Bush 50%
Kerry 48%
Nader 2%

So things could change dramatically if Nader was to drop out and support Kerry...but that won't happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vogon_Glory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-04 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
14. May It Be So
May your prediction prove accurate, but I fear that too many voters are still swayed by the fact that no matter how much they disagree with his decisions or his administration's policies, they think that George UUalker Bush is a likable individual. To think that someone may be likable yet vote against him anyway requires more intellectual and emotional maturity than many American voters possess.

I suppose an argument to make to our more conservative yet politically naive fellow citizens is that they can still like Dubya anyway as an ex-President. We Democrats are trying to speed up the "ex"ing part of the process. :evilgrin:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zinfandel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-04 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. "requires more intellectual and emotional maturity than many American
Edited on Fri May-07-04 04:06 PM by Zinfandel
voter possess."

You are so correct and what people almost always overlook, (just look at the polls, fuck up after fuck up and Bush is still about even) because people are so blindly (and rightfully so) focused on the issues and the facts, they fail to see why Bush may very well win this election...if I was a betting man...I wouldn't bet against Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-04 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
16. You're a shade more optomistic than me
I say 60/40 or so (disregarding Nader).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-04 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
18. That may be the honest vote...what Diebold and Pravda will say
Kerry 56% Bush 45%.

Although a win is a win.

Whatever the honest vote is: take 7% from Kerry and add 3% to Bunnypants*.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-04 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. I see almost a repeat
Kerry 49%, Bush 50%, Nader less than 1%. I'm not sure how the electoral college will breakdown though. It could very well be repukes complaining about the electoral college in the next election if Kerry wins the key states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-07-04 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. I concur, afte Felon Purges and Diebold Backdoors and 10,000 vacation Home
Bushevik Extra Votes and stacking error-prone machines in minority areas and re-feeding Bushevik absentee ballots but not Dem ones and letting Bushevik Praetorian Guards like Charles Kane have free access to the State Voter Databases unsupervised for 2 weeks and lets not forget the more and more common (for Busheviks, for everyone else it's still illegal) use of Taxpayer Funds to solicit Bushevik Absentee Votes, often from people who haven't lived in the State for years?

Have I missed anything? After all of that, I definitely feel that you results may be what Pravda tells us we voted (which has nothing to do with how we actually voted).

You don't have to worry about the Busheviks bitching about the Electoral College, because, if Bunnypants*, after the MANY CHEATS is ahead in the Diebold Vote Total, he WILL win.

Only others besides the Imperial Family can "lose" while winning the popular vote (as Corproate TV Pravda falsely repots, of course).

Yes yes yes, I know about 1876 and 1888, but that was in the Old American Republic, which was a completely different country that the one we're living in now.

No relationship at all the Imperial Amerika, besides the wretched remnants and the fact that the now-almost-defunct Constitution and Bill of Rights are given ample Lip Service as if we still did live in the Old Republic.

but we don't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC