Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Matalin: It would be irresponsible to fire DefSec in middle of 2 wars->

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Failure Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 10:09 AM
Original message
Matalin: It would be irresponsible to fire DefSec in middle of 2 wars->
is she admitting that the war in iraq is not part of the war on terror?

whatchu think?


failure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Failure Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. She answered my question...she spoke of them as two separate wars..
so is she lying or is it shrubby?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #1
28. Did you honestly think there was such a thing as a war on terror???
How could there be?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Failure Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #28
48. no it was really a rhetorical question....nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
immoderate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
43. We should fire him when it gets to FIVE wars?
--IMM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
2. what do I think?
I think she is a f***ing Bush Whore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wickerman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
3. It also belies the "He is winner of two wars" sec of defline
They are rambling and off message - we need to do the world a favor and put them down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
4. Fire the SOB
He IS one of the people responsible for this illegal invasion in the first place. Then arrest him for war crimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
5. No, it was irresponsible to start 2 wars
and some fool made the call...so some fool should own up to it and do the correct thing.

and yes, if it's 2 wars then it can't be the all encompassing "war on terror" ..which implies it's all one war..not separate wars
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Failure Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Bush is the one who says Iraq is the central battle in the
war on terror...Matalin says they're two separate wars...they say we don't have a message...they don't know which end's up.


failure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #8
15. Sadly, they don't know which end is up...you're correct
they only know how to change their talking points to fit their crimes..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #15
41. more like - "they only know how to change their talking points to fit the
the moment".

They don't even listen to what they say from moment to moment anymore.

It's white - it's black the next moment.

And the sheeple eat it all up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Failure Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
6. Matalin: If Iraq is the question, Kerry's not the answer...
:puke: :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
7. Not if he were replaced with someone competent
From day one, I wondered why Colin didn't get the job. I figured the GOP couldn't stand the thought of a black person commanding the entire military. But it's clear now that they had an agenda that they feared Colin might have interfered with.

:headbang:
rocknation

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Failure Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Powell is a token, a billboard...cover. meaningless...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #7
19. It was too soon
If the SecDef candidate is former military, 10 years must have elapsed from his/her retirement before eligibility. Not that it mattered, Powell wasn't getting the job anyway, not when there were deranged neocons on tap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #7
31. Powell is shit
He's in on the whole thing and has been since the 1980s. Don't be fooled, read Craig Unger's House of Bush, House of Saud. He's guilty as sin. He is a fucking war criminal of the worst sort, lower than snake shit. Don't be fooled by the good cop, bad cop routine between him and Rummy or him and Cheney. And don't be snookered by Woodward's portrayal either. Colin is as much of a bad seed as the rest of them ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
central scrutinizer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #31
52. he's been a toad since the early 70's
his "career" took off when he helped cover up My Lai. Read consortiumnews.com for another history of this opportunist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
10. Tell that to Abraham Lincoln
How many generals did he fire before getting the ones he liked?

That's gotta be the stupidest thing I've heard yet from a Republican in this affair. So we have a leader who is failing miserably at his job, and they want to keep him because you don't fire failures during failing wars?

That's the ultimate sense of entitlement. No wonder things always fall apart under Republicans. They don't even believe they should be required to do good jobs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Failure Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Lincoln wasn't arrogant like these bushCo folks are..nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #10
36. I couldn't have said it better, joby.
If anyone else with a regular job screwed up like this, they'd be gone. But a serious, killing war, and we have to keep the fuckup because it's wartime? I say we should have gotten rid of him sooner rather than later. And like Lincoln, go thru as many as you need to to get a competent person.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoPasaran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #10
54. Not only Lincoln fire generals
He also replaced his first Secretary of War, Cameron, with Stanton.

Keeping incompetent people on the job is what's irresponsible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #10
58. Does that mean...
that RumNut has to stay when gw* gets booted out?


Truman had 4
Forrestal, James V. (Vincent)
Johnson, Louis A. (Arthur)
Marshall, George C. (Catlett), Jr.
Lovett, Robert A. (Abercrombie)
Eisenhower had 3
Charles E. Wilson
Neil H. McElroy
Thomas S. Gates
Nixon had 3
Melvin Laird
Elliot L. Richardson
James R. Schlesinger
Clinton had 3
Les Aspin
William J. Perry
William S. Cohen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
11. Matlin just gave James the hand...
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Failure Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. How the HELL can they be married...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. James has a very strong stomach...
:puke: :puke: :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Failure Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. she just makes me sick too...I feel dirty all over after I hear her speak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #17
33. me too and I have to admit
I think less and less of James because she infects him. I just don't get it ... no amount of love or sex could overcome such basic, deeply held differences in thought and philosophy. James now comes across as the weaker of the two. How could he sit there and let that bitch say the economy is stronger than it's been in 20 years?? Sickening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #13
20. They avoid politics, I guess
They have the same jobs, similar backgrounds. I imagine they have a lot in common, except the political ideology. Besides, watch Matlin. She's not as convinced as Carville is. Carville's a true believer, but Matlin says what she's supposed to without nearly as much conviction.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doni_georgia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #20
40. My guess is she's not nearly the idealogue is real life that she plays
on TV.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #20
42. It's just gotta be the sex - like to rabid dogs in the street.
I can't imagine anyone so opposed to my thinking lasting in a relationship with me.

But maybe it's all just a game to them both - they don't really care after all? That might explain alot, to. I can readily more imagine them back at home laughing at us all while they BOTH rake in the big bucks for their "act".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #42
45. Nah, Carville isn't faking
I know a couple like them, where the wife is a Democratic strategist and the husband is a Republican activist. They do well as a couple, they just don't breathe a word about politics.

I guess since it is their job, they can leave it at the office, even if their job is based on deep-seated beliefs. They are probably both burned out on politics when they get home, and maybe that in itself draws them together, since both wants someone who can understand that they have to get away from their jobs for a while.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #42
51. You're right. it is "just a game to them both"
They're just two spoiled little brats playing a well-paying game of "capture the flag" I have no more respect for Carville than I do for his bitter half.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Failure Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
14. Shes a witch! BURN HER! (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knight_of_the_star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #14
29. I take offense to that sir!
She is no witch! I know many witches personally and they would NEVER do the kind of crap that she does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Failure Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #29
56. Never watched Monty Python, huh? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
18. She is projecting, It would be extremely Irresponsible to KEEP him
Why hang on to a losing guy? Everything he decides these days are losers. His days are long over. should not have been brought out of retirement. Its time for Rummy to face HIS Shock and Awe of being FIRED.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
21. Losing a war is the cardinal political offense
Edited on Sun May-09-04 10:22 AM by teryang
The cakewalk is over. They fraudulently misrepresented the threat. Underestimated the "enemy." Now, they are losing the conflict.

This is a situation of winning the tactical engagements and losing strategically as the Army is reporting off the record. However, the strategic blunder of commiting the lion share of American combat power to an unjustified invasion was something discussed here at DU before the "victorious" invasion even began.

Did we win in Fallujah?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Failure Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
22. I guess they have to show a "human" side to matalin...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cassandra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
23. We should fire the DefSec...
because we're in the middle of two wars, and making a huge mess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
24. I don't think Rummy should be fired.
He is in charge of this mess, and seems to be making the decisions on how wto proceed. It doesn't look like either Afghan or Iraq will get better in the next 6 months.

Rummy should take the hit along with Shrub as Commander in Chief!

To fire Rummy now would just give Shrub an out to blame everything on Rummy and say things will be much better now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. I agree.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enraged_Ape Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
26. What is this Republican worship of staying committed to failure?
Do they really conduct their own lives this way? I mean, is it just me and a few of my liberal buddies who think that if you make a serious mistake, you should realize it and correct it immediately to avoid any further, more serious damage?

Since when did it become fashionable to perpetuate one's mistakes? To keep fuck-ups in their jobs? To throw good money after bad? Do they really think we should do that? Do they really think its honorable and American to continue to be a fucking patsy?

If they really do feel this way, I want their names, addresses, and phone numbers, so I can make lots and lots of money off of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Failure Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. I can't believe human beings really think and act the way the
right-wing fascists claim they do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #26
39. They are easily led by their Masters who make money off the Pub Scam
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
30. My first thought also
Of course, anybody with two (non-oxycontined) brain cells to rub together knows that the "war" (invasion/occupation) in/on/of Iraq has nothing to do with the "war" on terror.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
randr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
32. If I'm in a car with an out of control driver
I'm taking the wheel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strelnikov_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
34. Talking Point Of The Day
I have been seeing this statement uttered by shills for the administration over the last few days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
samsingh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
35. wasn't it irresponsible to start a phony war for oil?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
markses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
37. Now it's TWO wars, eh?
When they need it to be ONE war, it's ONE war.

When it sounds better as TWO wars, it's TWO wars.

These people are terminally incapable of telling the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scrotim Donating Member (171 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
38. so rummy needs to start a third war, to insure he won't have to resign?
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
44. Using that logic, we should suspend the elections. Bullsh*t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Failure Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
46. Why should we allow incompetance to continue...
What is the closest any of you have come to getting fired, but not.


failure./
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DinahMoeHum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
47. IOW, don't change dicks in the middle of a screw, right, Mary ?
sheeesh, why DID Jim Carville marry her, anyway?

:argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
49. It would be irresponsible to keep those who got us in the
middle of two wars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
50. Who cares what that hatchet-faced wretch thinks?
Oh...she is also stupid and heartless
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opiate69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
53. Irresponsible??
I guess in her mind, leaving an inept, lying, war-mongering madman in charge of Defense would be the epitome of responsibility?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
55. It's irresponsible to keep him. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zero Gravitas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-04 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
57. They should have thought of that
before starting the two wars and letting that incompetent boob be in charge of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 07:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC