Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Help refute this e-mail!!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
AnnitaR Donating Member (958 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 10:16 PM
Original message
Help refute this e-mail!!!
:puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke: :puke:
You are not going to believe this e-mail that was sent to me from my BOSS!!! Want to help me refute this garbage? Please reply!

Here's the e-mail:
FDR led us into World War II. Germany never attacked us: Japan did. From 1941-1945, 450,000 lives were lost, an average of 112,500 per year.

Truman finished that war and started one in Korea, North Korea never attacked us. From 1950-1953, 55,000 lives were lost, an average of 18,333 per year.

John F. Kennedy started the Vietnam conflict in 1962. Vietnam never attacked us.

Johnson turned Vietnam into a quagmire. From 1965-1975, 58,000 lives were lost, an average of 5,800 per year.

Clinton ! went to war in Bosnia without UN or French consent, Bosnia never attacked us. He was offered Osama bin Laden's head on a platter three times by Sudan and did nothing. Osama has attacked us on multiple occasions.

In the two years since terrorists attacked us, President Bush has liberated two countries, crushed the Taliban, crippled al-Qaida, put nuclear inspectors in Lybia, Iran and North Korea without firing a shot, and captured a terrorist who slaughtered 300,000 of his own people. We lost 600 soldiers, an average of 300 a year. Bush did all this abroad while not allowing another terrorist attack at home. Worst president in history?
Come on!



The Democrats are complaining about how long the war is taking, but...

It took less time to take Iraq than it took Janet Reno to take the Branch Davidian compound. That was a 51 day operation.

We've been looking for evidence of chemical weapons in Iraq for less time than it took Hillary Clinton to find the Rose Law Firm billing records.

It took less time for the 3rd Infantry Division and the Marines to destroy the Medina Republican Guard than it took Teddy Kennedy to call the police
after his Oldsmobile sank at Chappaquiddick.

It took less time to take Iraq than it took to count the votes in Florida!!!!

Our military and the Commander-in-Chief is GREAT! PASS IT ON.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. Germany declared War on the US. after
Germany declared War on the U.S. after Japan bombed Pearl Harbor.

Germany declared was on us before we declared was on Germany.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. Sounds like a list of talk radio talking points
Full of cant and simplistic bumper sticker phrases.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. Take it up with HIS BOSS
This is wholly inappropriate behavior for somebody in management with regards to an employee. Take this to HR immediately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trag Donating Member (286 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
4. As far as I know.
Clinton did Bosnia through NATO to save lives. Not one US service person died. Feel free to correct me if I am wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katusha Donating Member (592 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
5. one small piece at a time
FDR led us into World War II. Germany never attacked us: Japan did. From 1941-1945, 450,000 lives were lost, an average of 112,500 per year.

Japan attacked, militarily, the united states and the US declared war on Japan on 12/8/41. hitler declared war on US on 12/11/41.
http://www.law.ou.edu/hist/germwar.html

the total casualties in WW2 is approximately 50 million. US casualties make up around 1% of total while we contributed greatly in industry and personnel to the effort.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katusha Donating Member (592 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. Korea
Truman finished that war and started one in Korea, North Korea never attacked us. From 1950-1953, 55,000 lives were lost, an average of 18,333 per year.

north Korea invaded south Korea on June 25, 1950. America committed to the defense of a sovereign nation at the direction of the united nations, much as bush's father did for Kuwait.
http://www.trumanlibrary.org/whistlestop/study_collections/korea/large/week1/kw_3_1.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katusha Donating Member (592 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. Vietnam
Johnson turned Vietnam into a quagmire. From 1965-1975, 58,000 lives were lost, an average of 5,800 per year.

from 1969 to 1975 the white house was occupied by republican administrations so subtract 30,000 or so casualties off according to the cited math or you could look at the actual figures and note that the first death occurred in 1957.
http://www.angelfire.com/tx/wdf/deaths.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katusha Donating Member (592 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. terrorism
as far as the war on terror goes, i think this speaks for itself

http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/latimests/20040609/ts_latimes/uswillrevisedataonterror

WASHINGTON — The State Department is scrambling to revise its annual report on global terrorism to acknowledge that it understated the number of deadly attacks in 2003, amid charges that the document is inaccurate and was politically manipulated by the Bush administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shawn703 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #18
25. Also, weren't the first troops in that area put there by Eisenhower? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LTR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
6. Uhhh...we haven't taken Iraq yet
If we have, why are so many soldiers dying?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-09-04 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #6
24. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
7. This is as old as the hills
Edited on Tue Jun-08-04 10:31 PM by Gman
The old "Democrats have started every war in history", and especially, "the US started WWII." I believe Bob Dole threw this out in 1996. Anyone that's ever finished 5th grade (which exclude an awful lot of freepers) recognizes the fallacies immediately.

All you can do is pity the person sending that out because they probably believe it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BillZBubb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
8. This has been smashed before.
1. What the imbecile forgot to mention was that Germany declared war against us as part of their alliance with Japan. What was FDR gonna do, ignore that?

2. North Korea attacked a US ally--South Korea. What was Truman supposed to do, ignore our treaty and let the North swallow the South?

3. Serious U.S. involvement in VietNam began under Eisenhower. First he supported the French until they got beat, then he supported puppet regimes in the South.

4. Johnson AND Nixon turned VietNam into a quagmire.

5. Bosnia was actively murdering Muslims in Kosovo. What was Clinton supposed to do, let them get away with it? As for Bin Laden, that is a lie, he was NEVER offered Bin Laden by Sudan. Snopes has that I think.

6. There are no nuclear inspectors in North Korea. That is the problem. North Korea kicked them out BECAUSE of Bush*. They are now actively building nukes. The inspectors are back in Iran, but no thanks to Bush*. The Europeans did that without US interference. So far Bush* hasn't "liberated" any countries. Iraq and Afghanistan are still total basketcases. The people in both countries say they are worse off now than before. We also killed at least 40,000 Iraqi's (10,000 totally innocent civilians) in "liberating" them.

7. The last bit is hilarious. The idiot must have believed the "Mission Accomplished" propaganda. We've still got troops getting killed in both Afghanistan and Iraq daily. Nearly 150,000 troops in the field. I guess they don't count, since the war took less than the 51 days at Waco?

8. It's been over 1000 days since the Shrub said he'd round up Bin Laden and bring him to justice. Where is he Mr. Great Commander????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #8
19. Gotta love the "Crippled Al Qaeda" part
Do these people ever read newspapers???!!!

Also, can they not exercise enough brain cells to realize that the reasons for the wars cited were at least factually correct? Europe in WWII, Vietnam, Bosnia etc.-- the factual bases for our going into battle were accurate. It wasn't about whether or not these countries attacked us. The issue is that Chimpy's rationale for invading Iraq was not accurate -- he said Iraq was an immediate threat to the US due to WMDs, and that was untrue. Can they really not understand the difference?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnnitaR Donating Member (958 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
9. Thanks for the replies so far!
I am just APPALLED that my boss would send this crap to me! Using our supposedly work only e-mail!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Take it up with HR
Seriously, this is a horrible transgression for somebody in management.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheswick2.0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
11. I can't wait for the grand unmasking on election night
You can't respond to this e-mail and had to post it here? Well your boss has a clever way to get right wing crap on DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnnitaR Donating Member (958 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #11
20. I could respond and have!
But I thought you guys would like to get a crack at the the crap that is being sent around these days!

Wanted to send the boss as many opinions as her inbox would allow.

Thanks for your pleasant reply though! :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malatesta1137 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
12. give me your boss'
email address, I will let him know a thing or two. I'm serious, don't de afraid, he won't know you had anything to do with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sundancekid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
13. if this e-mail is being sent to you in the work place, this ...
... MAY BE a big legal problem for your boss -- get proper advice from a lawyer, HR, a union rep (if applicable) ... ask about harrassment in the workplace and/or the applicability of the Hatch Act ... also, be VERY careful about engaging/participating with your boss in "refuting" and somehow ratifying what your boss is doing ON COMPANY TIME (if that's the case) ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchtv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
15. he forgot Nixon
( Cambodia-Laos), Grenada. Remember the civilians in Panama City? the americans paid for the CIA's drug crazed Latin American adventures. Then there was Chile what a travest that was. The supported the most evil people. Ask Ike about the "intervention" in Guatemala.Add to that Hoover's laizze faire business policies- led to 1929.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EndElectoral Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
16. What about Nixon's promise in 68 in Vietnam?
I guess those dead from 68 though his regime don't count. Guess he was too busy with Watergate...and his VP Agnew being forced from office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rolodomo Donating Member (145 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
17. Riiight.....
Comparing our GIs in Iraq to the raid at the Branch Davidian compound?? Ask him if our soldiers serving in Iraq would appreciate that comparison. If the boss responds with something like "just joking, there is no comparison", then write back that you thought the e-mail was BS and you're glad he just confirmed it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xray s Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
21. so I guess the point of your idiot boss's e-mail is...
Edited on Tue Jun-08-04 10:55 PM by xray s
Republicans didn't want us to fight Hitler and would rather of seen fascism control all the world. Gee, this isn't much of a surprise, since guys like Prescott Bush were running banks that financed the Nazi's.

Republicans would have rather seen communists overrun South Korea than fight them under a UN resolution approving the war.

Johnson screwed up Vietnam. No doubt about it. But the Republican who ran against him in 1964 wanted to start a nuclear war in Vietnam. Maybe WWIII with nukes. That's a better plan?

Clinton stopped the mass genocide of millions of Muslims in Bosnia. I guess that is why the Republicans don't care, because they think Islam is satanic, according to guys like Boykin.

The Taliban is still fighting. Osama is still around. al-Qaida is still plotting. The Bush administration has told us to expect another attack on US soil, and that this next attack would be much much worse than 9/11. People around the world hate the US. The military is in shambles.

But he has a point. Bush isn't the worst President in history, because he was never elected!

He is the worse puppet figurehead of a coup d'etat ever in history, though!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zen Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-04 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
22. The Iraqi army didn't even fight, for Pete's sake! Some victory.
And I get sick of the Janet Reno/Branch Davidian thing. The ATF/FBI raid started on February 28, 1993, and was led by Attorney General William Sessions, who was appointed by Reagan in 1987. Sessions was in charge of the Ruby Ridge debacle, then the Branch Davidian raid in February 1993. Janet Reno didn't even become Attorney General until March 12, 1993 - 13 days into the seige - and, new on the job, she deferred to Sessions. Read the story on PBS Frontline. Sessions left in July 1993, and was replaced by Louie Freh, another Republican.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC