WHY out Plame? Misdirection of investigation. Novak, you devil . . .!

[skip fox]

Without knowing motive, investigations flounder, roil in an acid bath of speculation.

The motive on the disclosure of Plame's identity as a CIA agent to Robert Novak was, primarily (thus "a primary motive" which, to a crime, is like a mind to a body . . . is anyone listening?), to discredit Wilson. The implict backstory (perhaps spelled out for the rubes who watch Fox News) is that Plame GOT Wilson assigned and both desired (conspired?) to discredit Bush's uranium/Niger claims in the State of the Union Address (2002). Dig? (I'm not saying motives of punishment and warning were non-existent, but that in the primary motive, one can find the fingerprint of the crime.)

Now this entire administration is TRIP-WIRED to do one thing to any negative assessment picked up on their radar: discredit it.

So . . . that doesn't narrow it down a lot, does it? (Feel like you're in some movie NOW??? Guess what? . . . There's no way out.)

But this move (movie) is subtle. Nuanced. I mean, it has all of the pizzazz of a dead drunk 57-year old regional champion wrestler's tumble, BUT its reaction and timing are nuanced. Interestingly so. Thus, not W. (Sorry, but that's simply the case.) Thus, . . . who? Not Cheney either. The malice is there (and in spades!!!) but the author of the back story isn't. Cheney is not a mind used to seeing around corners (else why is he where he is?)Who is the author of the backstory? You find him, you find Novak's source.



(Tonight, I'm channeling Deep Throat!!! . . . Is anybody listening???))

[cosmicdot]

1. no way out

the Plame Affair is likely the way into Falken's Maze ...... it is likely the smoking gun to get to the heart of the worst administration, and most corrupt extension of a couple of previous ones, in history.

the good ol'boys do not work in mysterious ways ... we have learned to know how they operate: character assassination to discredit is such a tool to bring down someone or something which throws a flag to its violations

if the 2004 convention hadn't been tied to what Arianna Huffington wrote about: the Anger Management Platform (see evil, hear evil, don't speak of it), there could have been floor demonstrations with big banners: "who's to blame for Plame" - but, no lettuce boycotters were allowed. Matter of fact, the voices which would bring matters to the prime time were blacked out of the Media - they were DLC'd - which is like death to democratic discourse ... yet, so many followed that piper ...

Was Plamed mentioned at the Convention? Was treason discussed even subtly?

Novak is a traitor, but he's only a front man, a messenger, for the culprits.

just some links to moderation:
http://www.progressive.org/webex04/wx073004.html

http://www.ariannaonline.com/blog/

:dem: