Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Which admin figure will leave DC the MOST discredited

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-01-04 12:32 PM
Original message
Which admin figure will leave DC the MOST discredited
or looking the most foolish/toolish?

Tom Ridge is looking prime today... (remember his slip when unrolling the safety advice per duct tape that the idea had been tested by... not safety experts but... FOCUS GROUPS! Gee Tom, we really feel better now...)

Or is it - I lost my stature and credibility at the altar of bush before the UN - Colin Powell...

Other nominations?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-01-04 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oh I think Cheney has already surpassed all of them
even amongst Republicans they have a very hard time defending him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-01-04 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. true... perhaps I should distinguish between those
that gleefully acted and don't give a damn per public perception (its all about the power baby...)

and those that seem to have played a long and now look like they are simply a tool - especially if they had been previously respected in the public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-01-04 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #5
22. I am revising this opinion
when typing a response to MonicaL ... I rethought the distinction of intentional acts (eg ring leading - thus not a tool so to speak)... with many in the public he did once have credibility - remember that many felt better about bush (due to his lack of brain power) because of Cheney... very few still view him this way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlyvi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-01-04 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. Mr. "I can't imagine" Rumsfeld
I can't imagine we need more troops.
I can't imagine we'll be in Iraq for very long.
I can't imagine it will cost that much.
I can't imagine we'll need a draft.
I can't imagine being out on my ass after November 2.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-01-04 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
23. How about contradicta "NO ONE could have IMAGINED..." rice?
If you want something to fuck up, ROYALLY, just put her in charge of it. Look how well we anticipated 9/11. Look how spot-on our intel was - pushing toward war. Look how well Iraq's been doing since bush gave her overladyship of it. She's a poster child for The Peter Principle. The worst incompetent, the poorest excuse for a PhD I've ever seen sucking air off the planet. The biggest PR for the most wretched of nincompoops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemoTex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-01-04 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
3. A$$croft
But it is hard to pick just one in the Bu$hco ship of fools.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-01-04 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
24. Actually, that's a good choice. So is cheney. MOST of them belong
behind bars. And not the ones georgie-poo likes - where they serve all those nice drinks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemWitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-01-04 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
4. Shrubya Inc.
is going to stick it to Rummy and Wolfowitz. All the errors in judgement are going to be placed directly at their feet after November as to keep Shrubya and Cheney on the repubs pedestal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-01-04 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Then why haven't they done this already?
It would make bush look better (holding folks accountable) but he seems psychologically unable to do this (with the ONE exception of Harvey Pitt) - as if doing that somehow makes HIM look bad... I think they are uniquely safe (scary, eh.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-01-04 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
6. Colin Powell, he had the farthest to fall IMO eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-01-04 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I would have to agree - and he really looks pimped
per his UN performance, his known objections before that performance and then going in and performing anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newscaster Donating Member (586 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-01-04 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
9. How about Condi Rise?
She is certainly one of the admin's prime liars and like Bush.....
In the wrong Job. She should be on the State Dept Russian Desk because she is said to be an expert on the old USSR but they put her as top adviser when the middle east is in the spotlight? Wrong wrong wrong.

Rice is a major WMD liar as is Bushie who is also in over his head. The best government job for him would be......forest ranger at Everglades National Park.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-01-04 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
10. Condi Mushroom Cloud Jets As Missiles Rice
Our national security adviser on the day of 9/11.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-01-04 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #10
20. she of the... we didn't have specific evidence
and there for did nothing wrong... if we knew the dates and times then we could have acted (she is INCOMPETENT!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
punpirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-01-04 12:46 PM
Original message
Gore Vidal may have his own agenda...
... but he's been watching politics in this country for a long, long time. He says Bush will leave office the most despised President in history. Ultimately, it's going to be Bush himself who is most discredited....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-01-04 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
17. I only hope this IF all of the despise generalizes out to those
who brung him to the dance. Would hate to see all of the anger pinpointed on him, but leaving the movement largely sound and the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-01-04 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
11. I nominate Donald Rumsfeld
This is a really difficult question. Even those who had little credibility to begin with lost whatever they had while serving the junta.

Rumsfeld at least seemed like a competent bureaucrat four years ago; I didn't think he was a bad choice for Defense Secretary. Now I think he should be brought up on war crimes charges.

Rumsfeld's lies have at least been witty. I'm still impressed with "the absence of evidence is not evidence of absence" in reference to Saddam's biochemical arsenal. Other lies were just outlandish, such as "We know where they are; they're in the neighborhood of Baghdad and Tikrit." Obviously, he either had no clue where Saddam's weapons were or, more likely, he knew very well that Saddam didn't have any biochemical weapons in Baghdad or Tikrit or anywhere else. His most recent pronouncement that the methods of torture he approved were not methods of torture is just pure obfuscation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-01-04 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. I would agree... even though he started with only minimal credibility
and though he doesn't seem to fit the "tool" part (as in, being used) - but his statements demonstrate contempt and shallowness and a complete and utter disregard for those in the military, and for the general public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
comradebillyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-01-04 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
12. too many excellent choices of incompetence
but rummy is a leading candidate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-01-04 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
13. after reading chap. 8 of the 9-11 report
I cannot fathom why Condi and Hadley have not 1) resigned 2) been fired.
They really blew it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-01-04 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. I am hoping that the NON FIRING becomes a more common theme
it really counters the "bush didn't lie... it was the intelligence folks fault."

Then why are they all still in their jobs, why have no changes been made?

Yes, we say it among ourselves, and occaisionally a dem will say it during the rare moments of tv/radio time we are given - but that question has not penetrated the public psyche. I think it is an important one, because it underscores an overall impression of intentional, ideologically driven incompetence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikehiggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-01-04 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
14. Powell
He was the only one who had any credibility in January 2001. What has he left to him now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swede Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-01-04 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
15. Send in the clowns.
Neocons,rightwing Christians, or just the plain greedy bastards,they are all gonna look pretty bad in the history books.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-01-04 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
16. Cheney
Big time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-01-04 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. Hard to believe that Cheney ever had any credibility in the first place
but given the national sigh of relief when he was selected (b/c bush was such an intellelctual lightweight) - it is clear that in many corners he once did have credibility. I have to rethink my comments earlier to NSMA - where I excluded Cheney due to his intentional role in the various debacles (as opposed to those who have been placed into demeaning roleplaying such as Ridge)...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-01-04 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
25. Cheney 'em: ALL OF 'EM will be discredited
You can't single anyone out (although Colon Blow Powell is an attractive candidate for the dubious honor). They'll ALL be discredited. Smirk can't even do the lecture circuit because he can't string a coherent sentence together. Rove, maybe? Who'll want to hear a lecture by the twit that got them booted out of power?

Bottom line: ALL OF 'EM.

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightOwwl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-01-04 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
26. "Had we any inkling whatsoever
that terrorists were about to attack our country, we would have moved heaven and earth to protect America,"

The entire BushCo gang.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC