Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A new name for Bush* that I thought of (try this on your friends)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
rockymountaindem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-26-04 10:34 AM
Original message
A new name for Bush* that I thought of (try this on your friends)
"Dimitry"

I learned all about this man named Dimitry of Uglich in my Russian History class last year. Here's his story:

Ivan the Terrible had seven wives throughout his life. At the time, the Russian Orthodox would recognize one's first marriage, and the second (his first wife died of illness), and usually the third. After that, they were pretty much considered illegitimate. Dimitry was a child of wife #7, so he was basically considered a total bastard. He was also epileptic, and at age nine, as the story goes, killed himself by accident while playing with a knife. However, rumors circulated that Ivan's chief adviser, who came to rule Russia after Ivan's death, "disappeared" Dimitry.

So while this adviser, named Boris Godunov was ruling Russia, people kept popping up claiming to be Dimitry, who was supposedly the rightful heir although he was really a bastard. Angry peasants latched on to these men (there were two of them) and used them as leaders for pre-existing uprisings.

So let's see... men pretending to be someone they weren't (like Bush* is pretending to be Prez), who was really someone who shouldn't have ruled the country under any circumstances, got lots of angry followers to tear up the countryside. If Bush* lived in 16th century Russia, I could see him claiming to be this Dimitry guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Flammable Materials Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-26-04 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. If you have to explain it to people, it loses it's power.
Maybe if Bush were running in Russia, it'd be the bomb-diggity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rockymountaindem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-26-04 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yeah, I know... but hey,
when your explanation includes, Ivan the Terrible, "bastard" and stuff like that, it may provide an interesting story. The point is that here were unqualified losers, pretending to be another, long-dead unqualified loser, trying to replace a well-qualified leader like Gudonov.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ROC Donating Member (140 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-26-04 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. It is too obscure.
I think these nicknames confuse and, possibly, turnoff undecides.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rockymountaindem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-26-04 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Oh, have a little fun.
Besides, I wouldn't tell this to conservatives anyway. If you were trying to convert an undecided, would you call Bush* whistle-ass or chimpy while you were doing it? Lighten up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-26-04 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. Yeh, nicknaming as a put down makes us seems strident & untrustworthy
It's petty to always use the * or the put downs. When Kerry is president, I'm gonna make damn sure I tell every Republican (no, not rethuglican, jeezum!!) I hear insult our duly elected C-in-C that the president is to be respected because, dammit, he's the president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skooooo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-26-04 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
3. I got it right away..

..but I was a Russian major.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spinzonner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-26-04 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. I bet you never even got above Sergeant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skooooo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-26-04 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Hard to do that if you don't enter the military.
You're right!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-26-04 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
8. It's a flawed analogy.
The men were pretending to be something they weren't, but they never got to rule Russia. All the while Bush, want it or not, is our "glorious leader".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC