Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Was Joe Lieberman a mole from the PNAC, inserted into Al Gore's

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
KlatooBNikto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-04 06:02 AM
Original message
Was Joe Lieberman a mole from the PNAC, inserted into Al Gore's
campaign?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rainy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-04 06:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. no doubt
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-04 06:06 AM
Response to Original message
2. No. (eom)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Still_Notafraid Donating Member (304 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-04 06:08 AM
Response to Original message
3. I think he is a Repubacrat
I have always thought Joe was a Little to right,I do not think he is PNAC.I have seen him on FOX news a few times and they love him there hannity and o'liely which is a unholy alliance if you ask me.but i have yet to really dislike the guy, i would not want him representing our party for president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Was_Immer Donating Member (676 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-04 06:18 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Um
He was the most critical of any Democratic senator when it came to Clinton's impeachment! Hello, he's another Zell Miller!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KlatooBNikto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-04 06:33 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. But a soft spoken Zell Miller, a sheep in sheep's clothing!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orangepeel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-04 08:37 AM
Response to Reply #4
14. No he isn't. Not even close
For anyone who isn't a single issue voter, there is much to choose between them.

There are plenty of things that Lieberman is conservative on -- he's a war hawk (which is bad enough), has a mediocre record on civil liberties.

BUT, he's no Zell Miller, not by a long shot. Lieberman has an excellent record on reproductive rights, an excellent record on the environment, an excellent record on labor issues and a long history of standing up for African American civil rights.

To put it all in perspective, last year, Joe Lieberman voted the way the Christian Coalition wanted him to vote 0% of the time and Zell Miller voted the way they wanted him to vote 100% of the time.

Here are some more ratings of his voting record from project vote smart.
http://www.vote-smart.org/issue_rating_category.php?can_id=S0141103

2003 On the votes that the National Abortion Reproductive Rights Action League considered to be the most important in 2003, Senator Lieberman voted their preferred position 100 percent of the time. (Zell's rating was 0)

2003 Based on the votes, and co-sponsorship of legislation the The Humane Society of the United States considered to be the most important in 2003, Senator Lieberman voted their preferred position 100 percent of the time. (Zell's rating was 0)

2000 On the votes that the Americans for the Arts considered to be the most important in 2000, Senator Lieberman voted their preferred position 100 percent of the time. (Zell didn't have a rating)

2003 On the votes that the Americans for Tax Reform considered to be the most important in 2003, Senator Lieberman voted their preferred position 5 percent of the time. (Zell's rating was 70)

2001-2002 On the votes that the American Civil Liberties Union considered to be the most important in 2001-2002 , Senator Lieberman voted their preferred position 40 percent of the time. (like I said, mediocre, but Zell's rating was 25)

2001-2002 On the votes that the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People considered to be the most important in 2001-2002, Senator Lieberman voted their preferred position 94 percent of the time. (Zell's rating was 15)

2003 On the votes that the Christian Coalition considered to be the most important in 2003 , Senator Lieberman voted their preferred position 0 percent of the time. (Zell's rating was 100)

2003 On the votes that the National Education Association considered to be the most important in 2003, Senator Lieberman voted their preferred position 86 percent of the time (was 100% the year before; Zell's rating was 25).

2003 On the votes that the Sierra Club considered to be the most important in 2003, Senator Lieberman voted their preferred position 100 percent of the time (Zell's rating was 0).

2003 On the votes that the Family Research Council considered to be the most important in 2003, Senator Lieberman voted their preferred position 0 percent of the time. (Zell's rating was 86)

2003 On the votes that the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence considered to be the most important as of 2003, Senator Lieberman voted their preferred position 90 percent of the time. (Zell's rating was 50)

2003 On the votes that the American Public Health Association considered to be the most important in 2003, Senator Lieberman voted their preferred position 100 percent of the time. (Zell's rating was 0)

2003 On the votes that the AFL-CIO considered to be the most important in 2003, Senator Lieberman voted their preferred position 100 percent of the time (Zell's rating was 8).


2003 On the votes that the Alliance for Retired Americans considered to be the most important in 2003, Senator Lieberman voted their preferred position 100 percent of the time. (Zell's rating was 0)





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KlatooBNikto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-04 06:23 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. One reason I brought it up was he has renewed the Committee on
The Present Danger, a relic of Cold War days, and, guess who is a co chairman of this new incarnation of that notorious committee? None other than the warmonger PNAC CIA evildoer James Woolsey.This guy coined the term World War IV to describe this so called War On Terror.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-04 06:25 AM
Response to Original message
6. Is he a signatory on any of their screeds?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KlatooBNikto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-04 06:34 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. I am not sure.But I have read that he called the War on Iraq a Just War.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AG78 Donating Member (840 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-04 07:58 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. Seems like a teammate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flordehinojos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-04 07:23 AM
Response to Original message
9. For all of his religiosity, Joe Lieberman seems to be a Sharon admirer...
and one who does not realize that Sharon is doing to the Palestinians quite much what Hitler did to the Jews ... and by that I mean Sharon is denying Palestinians any rights of any sorts...and killing them, perhaps not in camps but in air raids and tank raids etc. Sharon is a force which is denying a people their voice and their freedom. Lieberman seems to support that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-04 07:33 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. I suspect Lieberman is a closte Likkudnik. One wonders if he also.....
...like wolfshitz and several other neocons, maintains dual citizenship.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jumpstart33 Donating Member (328 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. Good thing Gore didn't win then. He would be dead by now.
Think about it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wat_Tyler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-04 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
12. Wouldn't PNAC have employed a more effective mole?
We don't care much for Lieberman, but he's a Dem, like it or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-04 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
13. he's a (sh)reep. or he's Deputy Dawg. not sure yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasSissy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
15. Oh, stop it. That's silly. He's just a moderate Dem. & has been
for probably more years than you've been alive. He's a well respected member of Congress who is moderate in policy and philosophy. That may not agree with your philosophy, but it doesn't make him a Zell Miller or Satan. He's a soft spoken apparently honest individual. He seems slanted to Israel's concerns, but maybe that's because he's Jewish. I don't know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
16. LOL....Al Gore was the PNAC mole in Al Gore's campaign....
if it was anyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrWeird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
17. Either a mole or he got paid off.
I hope he got a lot for sucking Cheney's cock.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC