Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Revisiting Falwell's claim on the GOP....after viewing Frontline.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 10:32 PM
Original message
Revisiting Falwell's claim on the GOP....after viewing Frontline.
Edited on Thu Oct-14-04 10:33 PM by madfloridian
This article was posted here in September. It is time to revisit it.
http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20040925/news_1n25christ.html
Falwell says evangelicals control GOP, Bush's fate

SNIP.."WASHINGTON – The Rev. Jerry Falwell said yesterday that evangelical Christians, after nearly 25 years of increasing political activism, now control the Republican Party and the fate of President Bush in the November election...."

SNIP...""The Republican Party does not have the head count to elect a president without the support of religious conservatives," Falwell said at an election training conference of the Christian Coalition.

Falwell said evangelical Christians are now "by far the largest constituency" within the Republican Party, their route to dominance beginning in 1979 with his founding of the Moral Majority, a precursor to the Christian Coalition......"

And just a little dig here:
Howard Dean quotes George Bush about the Christian Coalition:
"I hate those people," he'd once snarled at me when I ribbed him at a White House governors' gathering about some trouble he was having in Texas with the Christian Coalition."

Seeing Frontline brought this to mind. I was raised as a Southern Baptist in the heart of conservative Florida. I am not being critical....just pointing this out. We have Southern Baptist churches splitting here along Conservative/Moderate lines. A church my father helped start in the 60s just did that. It has been heartbreaking to many of our friends, though we do not go there anymore.

The conservatives are against any role of women outside of the home, and women are to be subservient to their husbands. The split was inevitable. My dad would be so sad if he were still alive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
InfoMinister Donating Member (546 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. PNAC
They need to know about PNAC since they're so scared of the UN and world government and all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ibegurpard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. If that Bush quote is legitimate
it makes him even more despicable because he's pretending to be one of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. I believe it is totally legit.
It would be vintage W, with that flippant attitude.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sugarbleus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. I missed FRONTLINE... what did they present?
I too have this same article saved on my computer.. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. They brought up the Bush conversion, and the strong influence...
that the religious right played in the campaign, even Daddy Bush's campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sugarbleus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. Was it a "new" piece or a re run?
I did see a piece on this subject with the Bushes some time back. It made me puke then.

Most of us, by now, know that Bush and the neo cons are heavily supported by the RW relgious in this country; it's been in the works for years. I just wish the "blinded" believers could SEE that these people are purely pseudo-religious....CINO There isn't anything deeply spiritual about them AT ALL.


GOD WANTS SPIRITUAL FRUITS, NOT RELIGIOUS NUTS!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. Funny that you should mention this.
Two years ago, my California/Nevada relatives moved back to Oklahoma, and became intense convservative Southern Baptists. They don't seem to care that they are supporting the SBC, and their resolutions, which are anti-gay, insistent on women 'submitting' to their husbands, and insistent that women may not be pastors.

And my husband, child and I are Religious Scientists (like Unitarians) - very un-fundie, and very Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Big rift in the family.
And Bush could sacrifice a baby on national television - and they would still vote for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. They don't seem to care because they feel pious.
I was raised that way, my kids were also. They left that church and found another. We were spared the most rigid parts, as that has happened in this decade.

The church split here is breaking up close friends who are so damn superior they are unbearable.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JustFiveMoreMinutes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
6. Just saw on TBN (or whatever comcast 25 is here)...
... saying that 'The Democrats have become the secular party'.

Like secular is a bad word........... and for the righteous to read-between-the-lines.. VOTE REPUBLICAN.

Evidently, republicans will soon have to tatoo 666 on their foreheads to prove their worth to the party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kanary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. "Secular"? And all this time, I thought that's what our founders intended
Silly me. :hi:

Kanary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dob Bole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
10. I split from the SBC
and went to a "moderate" church (as far as theology goes.)

It's pretty common around here. President Carter left too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladybugg33 Donating Member (387 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-14-04 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
11. But I thought "God wants people to be free?"
He meant except for women in the funddie churches,.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Only the menfolks.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andromeda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 01:04 AM
Response to Original message
14. Wow!
Howard Dean quotes George Bush about the Christian Coalition:
"I hate those people," he'd once snarled at me when I ribbed him at a White House governors' gathering about some trouble he was having in Texas with the Christian Coalition."


But, but, but that's little George's base.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-15-04 01:10 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Yes, indeedy, it is.
I try to put this in for a few digs now and then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC